也可以使用一些外部(流)错误指示器在更高级别抛出异常:

List<String> errorMessages = new ArrayList<>(); // error indicator
//..
errorMessages.clear();

List<String> names = new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList("andrey", "angela", "pamela"));

names.stream()
.map(name -> {
    if (name != "pamela") {
      errorMessages.add(name + " is wrong here!"); 
      return null; // triggering the indicator
    }
    return name;
} )
.filter(elem -> (elem != null)) // bypassing propagation of only current unwanted data
//.filter(elem -> (errorMessages.size() == 0)) // or blocking any propagation once unwanted data detected
.forEach(System.out::println);

if (errorMessages.size() > 0) { // handling the indicator
  throw  new RuntimeException(String,join(", ", errorMessages));
}

这个UtilException helper类允许你在Java流中使用任何受控异常，如下所示:

Stream.of("java.lang.Object", "java.lang.Integer", "java.lang.String")
      .map(rethrowFunction(Class::forName))
      .collect(Collectors.toList());

注意:Class::forName抛出ClassNotFoundException，该异常被检查。流本身也会抛出ClassNotFoundException和NOT一些未检查的包装异常。

public final class UtilException {

@FunctionalInterface
public interface Consumer_WithExceptions<T, E extends Exception> {
    void accept(T t) throws E;
    }

@FunctionalInterface
public interface BiConsumer_WithExceptions<T, U, E extends Exception> {
    void accept(T t, U u) throws E;
    }

@FunctionalInterface
public interface Function_WithExceptions<T, R, E extends Exception> {
    R apply(T t) throws E;
    }

@FunctionalInterface
public interface Supplier_WithExceptions<T, E extends Exception> {
    T get() throws E;
    }

@FunctionalInterface
public interface Runnable_WithExceptions<E extends Exception> {
    void run() throws E;
    }

/** .forEach(rethrowConsumer(name -> System.out.println(Class.forName(name)))); or .forEach(rethrowConsumer(ClassNameUtil::println)); */
public static <T, E extends Exception> Consumer<T> rethrowConsumer(Consumer_WithExceptions<T, E> consumer) throws E {
    return t -> {
        try { consumer.accept(t); }
        catch (Exception exception) { throwAsUnchecked(exception); }
        };
    }

public static <T, U, E extends Exception> BiConsumer<T, U> rethrowBiConsumer(BiConsumer_WithExceptions<T, U, E> biConsumer) throws E {
    return (t, u) -> {
        try { biConsumer.accept(t, u); }
        catch (Exception exception) { throwAsUnchecked(exception); }
        };
    }

/** .map(rethrowFunction(name -> Class.forName(name))) or .map(rethrowFunction(Class::forName)) */
public static <T, R, E extends Exception> Function<T, R> rethrowFunction(Function_WithExceptions<T, R, E> function) throws E {
    return t -> {
        try { return function.apply(t); }
        catch (Exception exception) { throwAsUnchecked(exception); return null; }
        };
    }

/** rethrowSupplier(() -> new StringJoiner(new String(new byte[]{77, 97, 114, 107}, "UTF-8"))), */
public static <T, E extends Exception> Supplier<T> rethrowSupplier(Supplier_WithExceptions<T, E> function) throws E {
    return () -> {
        try { return function.get(); }
        catch (Exception exception) { throwAsUnchecked(exception); return null; }
        };
    }

/** uncheck(() -> Class.forName("xxx")); */
public static void uncheck(Runnable_WithExceptions t)
    {
    try { t.run(); }
    catch (Exception exception) { throwAsUnchecked(exception); }
    }

/** uncheck(() -> Class.forName("xxx")); */
public static <R, E extends Exception> R uncheck(Supplier_WithExceptions<R, E> supplier)
    {
    try { return supplier.get(); }
    catch (Exception exception) { throwAsUnchecked(exception); return null; }
    }

/** uncheck(Class::forName, "xxx"); */
public static <T, R, E extends Exception> R uncheck(Function_WithExceptions<T, R, E> function, T t) {
    try { return function.apply(t); }
    catch (Exception exception) { throwAsUnchecked(exception); return null; }
    }

@SuppressWarnings ("unchecked")
private static <E extends Throwable> void throwAsUnchecked(Exception exception) throws E { throw (E)exception; }

}

许多其他关于如何使用它的例子(在静态导入UtilException之后):

@Test
public void test_Consumer_with_checked_exceptions() throws IllegalAccessException {
    Stream.of("java.lang.Object", "java.lang.Integer", "java.lang.String")
          .forEach(rethrowConsumer(className -> System.out.println(Class.forName(className))));

    Stream.of("java.lang.Object", "java.lang.Integer", "java.lang.String")
          .forEach(rethrowConsumer(System.out::println));
    }

@Test
public void test_Function_with_checked_exceptions() throws ClassNotFoundException {
    List<Class> classes1
          = Stream.of("Object", "Integer", "String")
                  .map(rethrowFunction(className -> Class.forName("java.lang." + className)))
                  .collect(Collectors.toList());

    List<Class> classes2
          = Stream.of("java.lang.Object", "java.lang.Integer", "java.lang.String")
                  .map(rethrowFunction(Class::forName))
                  .collect(Collectors.toList());
    }

@Test
public void test_Supplier_with_checked_exceptions() throws ClassNotFoundException {
    Collector.of(
          rethrowSupplier(() -> new StringJoiner(new String(new byte[]{77, 97, 114, 107}, "UTF-8"))),
          StringJoiner::add, StringJoiner::merge, StringJoiner::toString);
    }

@Test    
public void test_uncheck_exception_thrown_by_method() {
    Class clazz1 = uncheck(() -> Class.forName("java.lang.String"));

    Class clazz2 = uncheck(Class::forName, "java.lang.String");
    }

@Test (expected = ClassNotFoundException.class)
public void test_if_correct_exception_is_still_thrown_by_method() {
    Class clazz3 = uncheck(Class::forName, "INVALID");
    }

但在了解以下优点、缺点和限制之前，不要使用它:

•如果调用代码要处理检查异常，则必须将其添加到包含流的方法的throws子句中。 编译器不会强迫你再添加它，所以更容易忘记它。

•如果调用代码已经处理了检查异常，编译器会提醒你将throws子句添加到方法声明中 包含流(如果你不这样做，它会说:异常永远不会在相应的try语句体中抛出)。

•在任何情况下，你都不能环绕流本身来捕获包含流的方法内部的检查异常 (如果你尝试，编译器会说:异常永远不会在相应的try语句体中抛出)。

•如果你调用的方法字面上永远不会抛出它声明的异常，那么你不应该包含throws子句。 例如:new String(byteArr， "UTF-8")抛出UnsupportedEncodingException，但Java规范保证UTF-8始终存在。 在这里，throws声明是一个麻烦，任何用最少的样板文件来消除它的解决方案都是受欢迎的。

•如果你讨厌受控异常，觉得它们从一开始就不应该被添加到Java语言中(越来越多的人这样认为， 并且我不是其中之一)，那么就不要将检查异常添加到包含流的方法的throws子句中。的检查 异常的行为就像一个未检查的异常。

• If you are implementing a strict interface where you don't have the option for adding a throws declaration, and yet throwing an exception is entirely appropriate, then wrapping an exception just to gain the privilege of throwing it results in a stacktrace with spurious exceptions which contribute no information about what actually went wrong. A good example is Runnable.run(), which does not throw any checked exceptions. In this case, you may decide not to add the checked exception to the throws clause of the method that contains the stream.

•在任何情况下，如果你决定不添加(或忘记添加)checked异常到包含流的方法的throws子句中， 注意抛出CHECKED异常的两个后果:

1)调用代码将无法通过名称捕获它(如果你尝试，编译器会说:异常永远不会在相应的try体中抛出 声明)。它会冒泡，并可能在主程序循环中被一些“catch Exception”或“catch Throwable”捕获，这可能是你 希望无论如何。

2)它违反了最小意外原则:仅仅捕获RuntimeException就不足以保证捕获所有的RuntimeException 可能的例外。因此，我认为这不应该在框架代码中完成，而应该在您完全控制的业务代码中完成。

总之:我认为这里的限制并不严重，可以放心使用UtilException类。然而，这取决于你!

引用: http://www.philandstuff.com/2012/04/28/sneakily-throwing-checked-exceptions.html http://www.mail-archive.com/javaposse@googlegroups.com/msg05984.html Project Lombok注释:@SneakyThrows Brian Goetz的观点(反对):我如何在Java 8流中抛出CHECKED异常? https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/225931/workaround-for-java-checked-exceptions?newreg=ddf0dd15e8174af8ba52e091cf85688e *

使用#propagate()方法。来自Sam Beran的Java 8 Blog的非guava实现示例:

public class Throwables {
    public interface ExceptionWrapper<E> {
        E wrap(Exception e);
    }

    public static <T> T propagate(Callable<T> callable) throws RuntimeException {
        return propagate(callable, RuntimeException::new);
    }

    public static <T, E extends Throwable> T propagate(Callable<T> callable, ExceptionWrapper<E> wrapper) throws E {
        try {
            return callable.call();
        } catch (RuntimeException e) {
            throw e;
        } catch (Exception e) {
            throw wrapper.wrap(e);
        }
    }
}

TLDR:尝试通过重构代码来避免这个问题:将“容易出错”的操作与“安全”的操作分开，只使用lambdas中的安全操作。

细节:

这并没有直接回答问题(有很多其他的答案)，但试图从一开始就避免这个问题:

根据我的经验，在Stream(或其他lambda表达式)中处理异常的需求通常来自这样一个事实，即异常被声明为从不应该抛出的方法抛出。这通常来自于将业务逻辑与输入和输出混合。你的帐户界面就是一个完美的例子:

interface Account {
    boolean isActive() throws IOException;
    String getNumber() throws IOException;
}

不要在每个getter上抛出IOException，考虑这样的设计:

interface AccountReader {
    Account readAccount(…) throws IOException;
}

interface Account {
    boolean isActive();
    String getNumber();
}

方法AccountReader.readAccount(…)可以从数据库或文件中读取帐户，如果未成功则抛出异常。它构造一个Account对象，该对象已经包含所有值，可以随时使用。由于这些值已经被readAccount(…)加载，getter不会抛出异常。因此，你可以在lambdas中自由地使用它们，而不需要包装、屏蔽或隐藏异常。

注意，您仍然需要处理readAccount(…)抛出的异常。毕竟，这就是异常存在的首要原因。但是假设readAccount(…)是在“其他地方”使用的，即在lambdas之外，在那里你可以使用Java提供的“正常”异常处理机制，即try-catch来处理它或throws来让它“冒泡”。

当然，不可能总是按照我描述的方式来做，但通常是这样的，它会导致更干净的代码(恕我直言):

Better separation of concerns and following single responsibility principle Less boilerplate: You don't have to clutter your code with throws IOException for no use but to satisfy the compiler Error handling: You handle the errors where they happen - when reading from a file or database - instead of somewhere in the middle of your business logic only because you want to get a fields value You may be able to make Account immutable and profit from the advantages thereof (e.g. thread safety) You don't need "dirty tricks" or workarounds to use Account in lambdas (e.g. in a Stream)

扩展@marcg解决方案，您通常可以在Streams中抛出和捕获检查异常;也就是说，编译器会要求你捕获/重新抛出，就像你在流外一样!

@FunctionalInterface
public interface Predicate_WithExceptions<T, E extends Exception> {
    boolean test(T t) throws E;
}

/**
 * .filter(rethrowPredicate(t -> t.isActive()))
 */
public static <T, E extends Exception> Predicate<T> rethrowPredicate(Predicate_WithExceptions<T, E> predicate) throws E {
    return t -> {
        try {
            return predicate.test(t);
        } catch (Exception exception) {
            return throwActualException(exception);
        }
    };
}

@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private static <T, E extends Exception> T throwActualException(Exception exception) throws E {
    throw (E) exception;
}

然后，您的示例将如下所示(添加测试以更清楚地显示它):

@Test
public void testPredicate() throws MyTestException {
    List<String> nonEmptyStrings = Stream.of("ciao", "")
            .filter(rethrowPredicate(s -> notEmpty(s)))
            .collect(toList());
    assertEquals(1, nonEmptyStrings.size());
    assertEquals("ciao", nonEmptyStrings.get(0));
}

private class MyTestException extends Exception { }

private boolean notEmpty(String value) throws MyTestException {
    if(value==null) {
        throw new MyTestException();
    }
    return !value.isEmpty();
}

@Test
public void testPredicateRaisingException() throws MyTestException {
    try {
        Stream.of("ciao", null)
                .filter(rethrowPredicate(s -> notEmpty(s)))
                .collect(toList());
        fail();
    } catch (MyTestException e) {
        //OK
    }
}

你可以通过包装你的lambda来抛出一个未检查的异常，然后在终端操作中解开这个未检查的异常，从而滚动你自己的Stream变体:

@FunctionalInterface
public interface ThrowingPredicate<T, X extends Throwable> {
    public boolean test(T t) throws X;
}

@FunctionalInterface
public interface ThrowingFunction<T, R, X extends Throwable> {
    public R apply(T t) throws X;
}

@FunctionalInterface
public interface ThrowingSupplier<R, X extends Throwable> {
    public R get() throws X;
}

public interface ThrowingStream<T, X extends Throwable> {
    public ThrowingStream<T, X> filter(
            ThrowingPredicate<? super T, ? extends X> predicate);

    public <R> ThrowingStream<T, R> map(
            ThrowingFunction<? super T, ? extends R, ? extends X> mapper);

    public <A, R> R collect(Collector<? super T, A, R> collector) throws X;

    // etc
}

class StreamAdapter<T, X extends Throwable> implements ThrowingStream<T, X> {
    private static class AdapterException extends RuntimeException {
        public AdapterException(Throwable cause) {
            super(cause);
        }
    }

    private final Stream<T> delegate;
    private final Class<X> x;

    StreamAdapter(Stream<T> delegate, Class<X> x) {
        this.delegate = delegate;
        this.x = x;
    }

    private <R> R maskException(ThrowingSupplier<R, X> method) {
        try {
            return method.get();
        } catch (Throwable t) {
            if (x.isInstance(t)) {
                throw new AdapterException(t);
            } else {
                throw t;
            }
        }
    }

    @Override
    public ThrowingStream<T, X> filter(ThrowingPredicate<T, X> predicate) {
        return new StreamAdapter<>(
                delegate.filter(t -> maskException(() -> predicate.test(t))), x);
    }

    @Override
    public <R> ThrowingStream<R, X> map(ThrowingFunction<T, R, X> mapper) {
        return new StreamAdapter<>(
                delegate.map(t -> maskException(() -> mapper.apply(t))), x);
    }

    private <R> R unmaskException(Supplier<R> method) throws X {
        try {
            return method.get();
        } catch (AdapterException e) {
            throw x.cast(e.getCause());
        }
    }

    @Override
    public <A, R> R collect(Collector<T, A, R> collector) throws X {
        return unmaskException(() -> delegate.collect(collector));
    }
}

然后你可以像使用流一样使用它:

Stream<Account> s = accounts.values().stream();
ThrowingStream<Account, IOException> ts = new StreamAdapter<>(s, IOException.class);
return ts.filter(Account::isActive).map(Account::getNumber).collect(toSet());

这个解决方案需要相当多的样板文件，所以我建议您看一看我已经创建的库，它完全符合我在这里为整个Stream类(以及更多!)所描述的内容。