除了以上差异之外，还有以下几个:

RV separates view creation and binding of data to view. In LV, you need to check if convertView is null or not for creating view, before binding data to it. So, in case of RV, view will be created only when it is needed but in case of LV, one can miss the check for convertview and will create view everytime. Switching between Grid and List is more easy now with LayoutManager. No need to notify and update all items, even if only single item is changed. One had to implement view caching in case of LV. It is provided in RV by default. (There is difference between view caching n recycling.) Very easy item animations in case of RV.

主要优势:

ViewHolder在ListView中默认是不可用的。我们将在getView()中显式地创建。 RecyclerView有内置的Viewholder。

ListView是RecyclerView的祖先。有很多事情ListView没有做，或者做得不好。如果您要收集ListView的缺点，并通过将问题抽象到不同的域来解决问题，那么您最终会得到类似于回收器视图的东西。下面是ListViews的主要问题点:

Didn't enforce View Reuse for same item types (look at one of the adapters that are used in a ListView, if you study the getView method you will see that nothing prevents a programmer from creating a new view for every row even if one is passed in via the convertView variable) Didn't prevent costly findViewById uses(Even if you were recycling views as noted above it was possible for devs to be calling findViewById to update the displayed contents of child views. The main purpose of the ViewHolder pattern in ListViews was to cache the findViewById calls. However this was only available if you knew about it as it wasn't part of the platform at all) Only supported Vertical Scrolling with Row displayed Views (Recycler view doesn't care about where views are placed and how they are moved, it's abstracted into a LayoutManager. A Recycler can therefore support the traditional ListView as shown above, as well as things like the GridView, but it isn't limited to that, it can do more, but you have to do the programming foot work to make it happen). Animations to added/removed was not a use case that was considered. It was completely up to you to figure out how go about this (compare the RecyclerView. Adapter classes notify* method offerings v. ListViews to get an idea).

简而言之，RecyclerView是一个更灵活的ListView，尽管你可能需要做更多的编码工作。

RecyclerView是一个新的ViewGroup，准备渲染任何 以类似的方式创建基于适配器的视图。它应该是 ListView和GridView的继承者，它可以在 最新的support-v7版本。已经开发了RecyclerView 考虑到可扩展性，因此可以创建任何类型的 你能想到的布局，但也不能没有一点恼人的地方 剂量。

安东尼奥·莱瓦的回答

 compile 'com.android.support:recyclerview-v7:27.0.0'

RecyclerView确实是一个比ListView强大的视图。 欲了解更多详情，请访问此页面。

您可以使用接口来提供单击侦听器。我用这个 技术与ListViews。 无需分隔:只需在行中添加宽度为的视图 Match_parent和1dp的高度，并给它一个背景色。 简单地使用StateList选择器作为行背景。 addHeaderView也可以在ListViews中避免使用:只需将 视图外的标头。

所以，如果效率是你所关心的，那么是的，用RecyclerView替换ListView是个好主意。

RecyclerView相对于listview的优点:

默认包含ViewHolder。 简单的动画。 支持水平，网格和交错布局

listView相对于recyclerView的优点:

易于添加分隔线。 可以使用内置的arrayAdapter简单的普通列表 支持页眉和页脚。 支持OnItemClickListner。