来自android开发者(创建列表和卡片):

RecyclerView小部件是一个更高级和灵活的版本 列表视图。

好吧,这听起来很酷,但当我看到这张示例图片时,我真的很困惑这两者之间的区别。

上面的图片可以通过ListView使用自定义适配器轻松创建。

那么,在什么情况下应该使用RecyclerView呢?


当前回答

以下是RecyclerView和ListView之间的几个关键点/区别。明智地接电话。

If ListView works for you, there is no reason to migrate. If you are writing a new UI, you might be better off with RecyclerView. RecylerView has inbuilt ViewHolder, doesn't need to implement our own like in listView. It support notify at particular index as well Things like animating the addition or removal of items are already implemented in the RecyclerView without you having to do anything We can associate a layout manager with a RecyclerView, this can be used for getting random views in recycleview while this was limitation in ListView In a ListView, the only type of view available is the vertical ListView. There is no official way to even implement a horizontal ListView. Now using a RecyclerView, we can have a i) LinearLayoutManager - which supports both vertical and horizontal lists, ii) StaggeredLayoutManager - which supports Pinterest like staggered lists, iii) GridLayoutManager - which supports displaying grids as seen in Gallery apps. And the best thing is that we can do all these dynamically as we want.

其他回答

RecyclerView被创建为一个ListView的改进,所以是的,你可以创建一个附加列表与ListView控件,但使用RecyclerView更容易,因为它:

在向上/向下滚动时重用单元格——这在ListView适配器中实现View Holder是可能的,但这是一个可选的事情,而在RecycleView中,这是默认的写适配器的方式。 解耦列表从它的容器-所以你可以很容易地把列表项在运行时在不同的容器(线性布局,gridLayout)通过设置LayoutManager。

例子:

mRecyclerView = (RecyclerView) findViewById(R.id.my_recycler_view);
mRecyclerView.setLayoutManager(new LinearLayoutManager(this));
//or
mRecyclerView.setLayoutManager(new GridLayoutManager(this, 2));

动画常用列表动作——动画被解耦并委托给ItemAnimator。

还有更多关于RecyclerView的内容,但我认为这些要点是主要的。

因此,综上所述,RecyclerView是处理“列表数据”的一个更灵活的控件,它遵循关注点的委托模式,只留给自己一个任务——回收项目。

RecyclerView相对于listview的优点:

默认包含ViewHolder。 简单的动画。 支持水平,网格和交错布局

listView相对于recyclerView的优点:

易于添加分隔线。 可以使用内置的arrayAdapter简单的普通列表 支持页眉和页脚。 支持OnItemClickListner。

简单的回答:在想要显示许多项,并且它们的数量是动态的情况下,应该使用RecyclerView。ListView应该只在项目数量总是相同并且受屏幕大小限制的情况下使用。

你会发现这很难,因为你只考虑Android库。

现在有很多选项可以帮助您构建自己的适配器,使您可以轻松地构建动态项目的列表和网格,您可以选择、重新排序、使用动画、分隔符、添加页脚、页眉等等。

不要害怕,给一个尝试RecyclerView,你可以开始喜欢它从一个ListView和一个RecyclerView中从网络下载的100个项目的列表,当你尝试滚动时,你会看到UX(用户体验)的差异,可能测试应用程序会在你甚至可以这样做之前停止。

我建议你检查这两个库来制作简单的适配器:

mikepenz的FastAdapter

davideas的FlexibleAdapter

In my opinion RecyclerView was made to address the problem with the recycle pattern used in listviews because it was making developer's life more difficult. All the other you could handle more or less. For instance I use the same adapter for ListView and GridView it doesn't matter in both views the getView, getItemCount, getTypeCount is used so it's the same. RecyclerView isn't needed if ListView with ListAdapter or GridView with grid adapters is already working for you. If you have implemented correctly the ViewHolder pattern in your listviews then you won't see any big improvement over RecycleView.

I think the main and biggest difference they have is that ListView looks for the position of the item while creating or putting it, on the other hand RecyclerView looks for the type of the item. if there is another item created with the same type RecyclerView does not create it again. It asks first adapter and then asks to recycledpool, if recycled pool says "yeah I've created a type similar to it", then RecyclerView doesn't try to create same type. ListView doesn't have a this kind of pooling mechanism.