这是我的分享

选项1 -计数从相同的域从不同的表

select distinct(select count(*) from domain1.table1) "count1", (select count(*) from domain1.table2) "count2" 
from domain1.table1, domain1.table2;

选项2 -同一表从不同的域计数

select distinct(select count(*) from domain1.table1) "count1", (select count(*) from domain2.table1) "count2" 
from domain1.table1, domain2.table1;

选项3 -计数从不同的领域为同一表与“联合所有”有行计数

select 'domain 1'"domain", count(*) 
from domain1.table1 
union all 
select 'domain 2', count(*) 
from domain2.table1;

享受SQL，我总是这样做:)

SELECT  (
        SELECT COUNT(*)
        FROM   tab1
        ) AS count1,
        (
        SELECT COUNT(*)
        FROM   tab2
        ) AS count2
FROM    dual

这是我的分享

选项1 -计数从相同的域从不同的表

select distinct(select count(*) from domain1.table1) "count1", (select count(*) from domain1.table2) "count2" 
from domain1.table1, domain1.table2;

选项2 -同一表从不同的域计数

select distinct(select count(*) from domain1.table1) "count1", (select count(*) from domain2.table1) "count2" 
from domain1.table1, domain2.table1;

选项3 -计数从不同的领域为同一表与“联合所有”有行计数

select 'domain 1'"domain", count(*) 
from domain1.table1 
union all 
select 'domain 2', count(*) 
from domain2.table1;

享受SQL，我总是这样做:)

只是因为它略有不同:

SELECT 'table_1' AS table_name, COUNT(*) FROM table_1
UNION
SELECT 'table_2' AS table_name, COUNT(*) FROM table_2
UNION
SELECT 'table_3' AS table_name, COUNT(*) FROM table_3

它给出了转置的答案(每个表一行而不是一列)，否则我不认为它有多大不同。我认为在性能方面，它们应该是相等的。

select (select count(*) from tab1) count_1, (select count(*) from tab2) count_2 from dual;

与不同的表进行JOIN

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (  
SELECT DISTINCT table_a.ID  FROM table_a JOIN table_c ON table_a.ID  = table_c.ID   );