子查询可以解决这个问题:

SELECT *
FROM  (
    SELECT DISTINCT ON (address_id) *
    FROM   purchases
    WHERE  product_id = 1
    ) p
ORDER  BY purchased_at DESC;

ORDER BY中的前导表达式必须与DISTINCT ON中的列一致，因此不能在同一个SELECT中按不同的列排序。

如果你想从每个集合中选择一个特定的行，只在子查询中使用一个额外的ORDER BY:

SELECT *
FROM  (
    SELECT DISTINCT ON (address_id) *
    FROM   purchases
    WHERE  product_id = 1
    ORDER  BY address_id, purchased_at DESC  -- get "latest" row per address_id
    ) p
ORDER  BY purchased_at DESC;

如果purchased_at可以为NULL，请使用DESC NULLS LAST -并匹配您的索引以获得最佳性能。看到的:

按列ASC排序，但空值首先? 为什么ORDER BY NULLS LAST会影响主键上的查询计划?

相关，有更多解释:

在每个GROUP BY GROUP中选择第一行? 按列ASC排序，但空值首先?

你可以在子查询中根据address_id排序，然后在外部查询中根据你想要的排序。

SELECT * FROM 
    (SELECT DISTINCT ON (address_id) purchases.address_id, purchases.* 
    FROM "purchases" 
    WHERE "purchases"."product_id" = 1 ORDER BY address_id DESC ) 
ORDER BY purchased_at DESC

文档中说:

DISTINCT ON(表达式[，…])只保留给定表达式求值为相等的每一组行的第一行。[…注意，每个集合的“第一行”是不可预测的，除非使用ORDER BY来确保所需的行首先出现。[…DISTINCT ON表达式必须匹配最左边的ORDER BY表达式。

官方文档

因此，您必须将address_id添加到order中。

或者，如果你正在寻找包含每个address_id的最近购买的产品的完整行，并且结果按purchased_at排序，那么你正在尝试解决每组最大N的问题，可以通过以下方法解决:

适用于大多数dbms的通用解决方案:

SELECT t1.* FROM purchases t1
JOIN (
    SELECT address_id, max(purchased_at) max_purchased_at
    FROM purchases
    WHERE product_id = 1
    GROUP BY address_id
) t2
ON t1.address_id = t2.address_id AND t1.purchased_at = t2.max_purchased_at
ORDER BY t1.purchased_at DESC

基于@hkf的回答，一个更面向postgresql的解决方案:

SELECT * FROM (
  SELECT DISTINCT ON (address_id) *
  FROM purchases 
  WHERE product_id = 1
  ORDER BY address_id, purchased_at DESC
) t
ORDER BY purchased_at DESC

此处澄清、扩展和解决的问题:按某列排序并在另一列上不同地选择行

它也可以使用以下查询和其他答案来解决。

WITH purchase_data AS (
        SELECT address_id, purchased_at, product_id,
                row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY address_id ORDER BY purchased_at DESC) AS row_number
        FROM purchases
        WHERE product_id = 1)
SELECT address_id, purchased_at, product_id
FROM purchase_data where row_number = 1

你也可以通过使用group by子句来做到这一点

   SELECT purchases.address_id, purchases.* FROM "purchases"
    WHERE "purchases"."product_id" = 1 GROUP BY address_id,
purchases.purchased_at ORDER purchases.purchased_at DESC

子查询可以解决这个问题:

SELECT *
FROM  (
    SELECT DISTINCT ON (address_id) *
    FROM   purchases
    WHERE  product_id = 1
    ) p
ORDER  BY purchased_at DESC;

ORDER BY中的前导表达式必须与DISTINCT ON中的列一致，因此不能在同一个SELECT中按不同的列排序。

如果你想从每个集合中选择一个特定的行，只在子查询中使用一个额外的ORDER BY:

SELECT *
FROM  (
    SELECT DISTINCT ON (address_id) *
    FROM   purchases
    WHERE  product_id = 1
    ORDER  BY address_id, purchased_at DESC  -- get "latest" row per address_id
    ) p
ORDER  BY purchased_at DESC;

如果purchased_at可以为NULL，请使用DESC NULLS LAST -并匹配您的索引以获得最佳性能。看到的:

按列ASC排序，但空值首先? 为什么ORDER BY NULLS LAST会影响主键上的查询计划?

相关，有更多解释:

在每个GROUP BY GROUP中选择第一行? 按列ASC排序，但空值首先?