使用以下方法处理所有情况：-

import re
a=re.match('((\d+[\.]\d*$)|(\.)\d+$)' ,  '2.3') 
a=re.match('((\d+[\.]\d*$)|(\.)\d+$)' ,  '2.')
a=re.match('((\d+[\.]\d*$)|(\.)\d+$)' ,  '.3')
a=re.match('((\d+[\.]\d*$)|(\.)\d+$)' ,  '2.3sd')
a=re.match('((\d+[\.]\d*$)|(\.)\d+$)' ,  '2.3')

在Alfe指出您不需要单独检查浮点数后更新，因为两者都是复杂的句柄：

def is_number(s):
    try:
        complex(s) # for int, long, float and complex
    except ValueError:
        return False

    return True

之前说过：在一些罕见的情况下，您可能还需要检查复数（例如1+2i），这不能用浮点数表示：

def is_number(s):
    try:
        float(s) # for int, long and float
    except ValueError:
        try:
            complex(s) # for complex
        except ValueError:
            return False

    return True

我想看看哪种方法最快。总的来说，check_replace函数给出了最佳和最一致的结果。check_exception函数给出了最快的结果，但前提是没有触发异常——这意味着它的代码是最有效的，但抛出异常的开销非常大。

请注意，检查成功的强制转换是唯一准确的方法，例如，这与check_exception一起工作，但其他两个测试函数将为有效的float返回False：

huge_number = float('1e+100')

以下是基准代码：

import time, re, random, string

ITERATIONS = 10000000

class Timer:    
    def __enter__(self):
        self.start = time.clock()
        return self
    def __exit__(self, *args):
        self.end = time.clock()
        self.interval = self.end - self.start

def check_regexp(x):
    return re.compile("^\d*\.?\d*$").match(x) is not None

def check_replace(x):
    return x.replace('.','',1).isdigit()

def check_exception(s):
    try:
        float(s)
        return True
    except ValueError:
        return False

to_check = [check_regexp, check_replace, check_exception]

print('preparing data...')
good_numbers = [
    str(random.random() / random.random()) 
    for x in range(ITERATIONS)]

bad_numbers = ['.' + x for x in good_numbers]

strings = [
    ''.join(random.choice(string.ascii_uppercase + string.digits) for _ in range(random.randint(1,10)))
    for x in range(ITERATIONS)]

print('running test...')
for func in to_check:
    with Timer() as t:
        for x in good_numbers:
            res = func(x)
    print('%s with good floats: %s' % (func.__name__, t.interval))
    with Timer() as t:
        for x in bad_numbers:
            res = func(x)
    print('%s with bad floats: %s' % (func.__name__, t.interval))
    with Timer() as t:
        for x in strings:
            res = func(x)
    print('%s with strings: %s' % (func.__name__, t.interval))

以下是2017年MacBook Pro 13上Python 2.7.10的结果：

check_regexp with good floats: 12.688639
check_regexp with bad floats: 11.624862
check_regexp with strings: 11.349414
check_replace with good floats: 4.419841
check_replace with bad floats: 4.294909
check_replace with strings: 4.086358
check_exception with good floats: 3.276668
check_exception with bad floats: 13.843092
check_exception with strings: 15.786169

以下是2017年MacBook Pro 13上Python 3.6.5的结果：

check_regexp with good floats: 13.472906000000009
check_regexp with bad floats: 12.977665000000016
check_regexp with strings: 12.417542999999995
check_replace with good floats: 6.011045999999993
check_replace with bad floats: 4.849356
check_replace with strings: 4.282754000000011
check_exception with good floats: 6.039081999999979
check_exception with bad floats: 9.322753000000006
check_exception with strings: 9.952595000000002

以下是2017年MacBook Pro 13上PyPy 2.7.13的结果：

check_regexp with good floats: 2.693217
check_regexp with bad floats: 2.744819
check_regexp with strings: 2.532414
check_replace with good floats: 0.604367
check_replace with bad floats: 0.538169
check_replace with strings: 0.598664
check_exception with good floats: 1.944103
check_exception with bad floats: 2.449182
check_exception with strings: 2.200056

我知道我参加晚会迟到了，但我想出了一个不在这里的解决方案：此解决方案遵循Python中的EAFP原则

def get_number_from_string(value):
    try:
        int_value = int(value)
        return int_value

    except ValueError:
        return float(value)

说明：

如果字符串中的值是一个浮点数，并且我首先尝试将其解析为一个int，那么它将抛出一个ValueError。因此，我捕捉到该错误，并将该值解析为float和return。

您可以使用Unicode字符串，它们有一种方法可以满足您的需要：

>>> s = u"345"
>>> s.isnumeric()
True

Or:

>>> s = "345"
>>> u = unicode(s)
>>> u.isnumeric()
True

http://www.tutorialspoint.com/python/string_isnumeric.htm

http://docs.python.org/2/howto/unicode.html

这篇文章已经有了很好的答案。我想给出一个稍微不同的观点。

我们可以对字母表进行否定搜索，而不是搜索数字、数字或浮点数。即，我们可以要求程序查看它是否不是字母表。

## Check whether it is not alpha rather than checking if it is digit
print(not "-1.2345".isalpha())
print(not "-1.2345e-10".isalpha())

如果你确定你的字符串是一个格式良好的数字（下面的条件1和条件2），它会很好地工作。但是，如果字符串错误地不是一个格式良好的数字，那么它将失败。在这种情况下，即使字符串不是有效的数字，它也会返回数字匹配。为了解决这种情况，必须有许多基于规则的方法。然而，此时此刻，我想起了正则表达式。以下是三个案例。请注意，正则表达式可以更好，因为我不是正则表达式专家。下面有两个列表：一个用于有效数字，一个用于无效数字。必须拾取有效数字，而不能拾取无效数字。

==条件1：确保字符串为有效数字，但未选择“inf”==

Valid_Numbers = ["1","-1","+1","0.0",".1","1.2345","-1.2345","+1.2345","1.2345e10","1.2345e-10","-1.2345e10","-1.2345E10","-inf"]
Invalid_Numbers = ["1.1.1","++1","--1","-1-1","1.23e10e5","--inf"]

################################ Condition 1: Valid number excludes 'inf' ####################################

Case_1_Positive_Result = list(map(lambda x: not x.isalpha(),Valid_Numbers))
print("The below must all be True")
print(Case_1_Positive_Result)

## This check assumes a valid number. So it fails for the negative cases and wrongly detects string as number
Case_1_Negative_Result = list(map(lambda x: not x.isalpha(),Invalid_Numbers))
print("The below must all be False")
print(Case_1_Negative_Result)

The below must all be True
[True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True]
The below must all be False
[True, True, True, True, True, True]

==条件2：确保字符串为有效数字，并选择“inf”==

################################ Condition 2: Valid number includes 'inf'  ###################################
Case_2_Positive_Result = list(map(lambda x: x=="inf" or not x.isalpha(),Valid_Numbers+["inf"]))
print("The below must all be True")
print(Case_2_Positive_Result)

## This check assumes a valid number. So it fails for the negative cases and wrongly detects string as number
Case_2_Negative_Result = list(map(lambda x: x=="inf" or not x.isalpha(),Invalid_Numbers+["++inf"]))
print("The below must all be False")
print(Case_2_Negative_Result)

The below must all be True
[True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True]
The below must all be False
[True, True, True, True, True, True, True]

==条件3：字符串不保证是有效数字==

import re
CompiledPattern = re.compile(r"([+-]?(inf){1}$)|([+-]?[0-9]*\.?[0-9]*$)|([+-]?[0-9]*\.?[0-9]*[eE]{1}[+-]?[0-9]*$)")
Case_3_Positive_Result = list(map(lambda x: True if CompiledPattern.match(x) else False,Valid_Numbers+["inf"]))
print("The below must all be True")
print(Case_3_Positive_Result)

## This check assumes a valid number. So it fails for the negative cases and wrongly detects string as number
Case_3_Negative_Result = list(map(lambda x: True if CompiledPattern.match(x) else False,Invalid_Numbers+["++inf"]))
print("The below must all be False")
print(Case_3_Negative_Result)

The below must all be True
[True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True]
The below must all be False
[False, False, False, False, False, False, False]