一种新的JUnit测试方法:

 @${testType:newType(org.junit.Test)}
 public void ${testname}() throws Exception {
     ${staticImport:importStatic('org.junit.Assert.*')}${cursor}

     String expected = "" ;
     String actual = "" ;

     Assert.assertEquals(expected, actual);
}

Bean属性

private ${Type} ${property};

public ${Type} get${Property}() {
    return ${property};
}

public void set${Property}(${Type} ${property}) {
    ${propertyChangeSupport}.firePropertyChange("${property}", this.${property},     this.${property} = ${property});
}

PropertyChangeSupport

private PropertyChangeSupport ${propertyChangeSupport} = new PropertyChangeSupport(this);${:import(java.beans.PropertyChangeSupport,java.beans.PropertyChangeListener)}
public void addPropertyChangeListener(PropertyChangeListener listener) {
  ${propertyChangeSupport}.addPropertyChangeListener(listener);
}

public void addPropertyChangeListener(String propertyName, PropertyChangeListener listener) {
  ${propertyChangeSupport}.addPropertyChangeListener(propertyName, listener);
}

public void removePropertyChangeListener(PropertyChangeListener listener) {
  ${propertyChangeSupport}.removePropertyChangeListener(listener);
}

public void removePropertyChangeListener(String propertyName, PropertyChangeListener listener) {
  ${propertyChangeSupport}.removePropertyChangeListener(propertyName, listener);
}

插入测试方法时应给出

我最近在与一个非常优秀的开发人员和朋友结对编程时看到了一个类似的版本，我认为它可以成为这个列表的一个很好的补充。

This template will create a new test method on a class, following the Given - When - Then approach from the behavior-driven development (BDD) paradigm on the comments, as a guide for structuring the code. It will start the method name with "should" and let you replace the rest of the dummy method name "CheckThisAndThat" with the best possible description of the test method responsibility. After filling the name, TAB will take you straight to the // Given section, so you can start typing your preconditions.

我把它映射到三个字母“tst”，描述为“测试方法应该在什么时候给出”;)

我希望你能像我看到它时一样觉得它很有用:

@Test
public void should${CheckThisAndThat}() {
    Assert.fail("Not yet implemented");
    // Given
    ${cursor}

    // When


    // Then

}${:import(org.junit.Test, org.junit.Assert)}

我知道我是在找死，但为了完成起见，我想分享这个:

单例生成模板的正确版本，克服了有缺陷的双重检查锁定设计(上面讨论过，其他地方也提到过)

单例创建模板: 命名为createsingleton

static enum Singleton {
    INSTANCE;

    private static final ${enclosing_type} singleton = new ${enclosing_type}();

    public ${enclosing_type} getSingleton() {
        return singleton;
    }
}
${cursor}

访问使用上述方法生成的单例对象:

单例引用模板: 命名这个getsingleton:

${type} ${newName} = ${type}.Singleton.INSTANCE.getSingleton();

对于log，在成员变量中添加一个有用的小调。

private static Log log = LogFactory.getLog(${enclosing_type}.class);

我的良人中，有一人是弟兄。

for (${iterable_type} ${iterable_element} : ${iterable}) {
    ${cursor}
}

还有traceout，因为我经常用它来跟踪:

System.out.println("${enclosing_type}.${enclosing_method}()");

我刚刚想到了另一个，有一天在网上找到了它，const:

private static final ${type} ${name} = new ${type} ${cursor};