使用Mockito创建一个mock(在“Java语句”上下文中):

${:importStatic('org.mockito.Mockito.mock')}${Type} ${mockName} = mock(${Type}.class);

在“Java类型成员”中:

${:import(org.mockito.Mock)}@Mock
${Type} ${mockName};

模拟void方法抛出异常:

${:import(org.mockito.invocation.InvocationOnMock,org.mockito.stubbing.Answer)}
doThrow(${RuntimeException}.class).when(${mock:localVar}).${mockedMethod}(${args});

模拟一个void方法来做一些事情:

${:import(org.mockito.invocation.InvocationOnMock,org.mockito.stubbing.Answer)}doAnswer(new Answer<Object>() {
public Object answer(InvocationOnMock invocation) throws Throwable {
    Object arg1 = invocation.getArguments()[0];
    return null;
}
}).when(${mock:localVar}).${mockedMethod}(${args});

验证被模拟的方法被精确地调用一次:

${:importStatic(org.mockito.Mockito.verify,org.mockito.Mockito.times)}
verify(${mock:localVar}, times(1)).${mockMethod}(${args});

验证mock方法从未被调用:

${:importStatic(org.mockito.Mockito.verify,org.mockito.Mockito.never)}verify(${mock:localVar}, never()).${mockMethod}(${args});

使用谷歌Guava的新链表(hashset和hashmap也类似):

${import:import(java.util.List,com.google.common.collect.Lists)}List<${T}> ${newName} = Lists.newLinkedList();

我还使用了一个生成Test类的巨大模板。下面是一个简短的片段，每个感兴趣的人都应该定制:

package ${enclosing_package};

import org.junit.*;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.*;
import static org.mockito.Matchers.*;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.*;
import org.mockito.Mockito;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.mockito.InjectMocks;
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.runners.MockitoJUnitRunner;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;

// TODO autogenerated test stub
@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class ${primary_type_name} {

    @InjectMocks
    protected ${testedType} ${testedInstance};
    ${cursor}

    @Mock
    protected Logger logger;

    @Before
    public void setup() throws Exception {
    }

    @Test
    public void shouldXXX() throws Exception {
        // given

        // when
        // TODO autogenerated method stub

        // then
        fail("Not implemented.");
    }
}
// Here goes mockito+junit cheetsheet

从当前显示中获取SWT颜色:

Display.getCurrent().getSystemColor(SWT.COLOR_${cursor})

周围都是syncexec

PlatformUI.getWorkbench().getDisplay().syncExec(new Runnable(){
    public void run(){
        ${line_selection}${cursor}
    }
});

使用单例设计模式:

/**
 * The shared instance.
 */
private static ${enclosing_type} instance = new ${enclosing_type}();

/**
 * Private constructor.
 */
private ${enclosing_type}() {
    super();
}

/**
 * Returns this shared instance.
 *
 * @returns The shared instance
 */
public static ${enclosing_type} getInstance() {
    return instance;
}

我看到了一个创建基本测试类的模板的答案，如果你更喜欢这种方法，这里有一些单独的调用:

使用@Before import创建setUp方法

${:import(org.junit.Before)}
@Before
public final void setUp() {
  ${cursor}
}

使用@Test import创建新的测试方法

${:import(org.junit.Test)}
@Test
public final void test${newName} () {
${cursor}
}

我使用以下代码来帮助在类型和dto之间进行JAXB转换:

将现有变量转换为返回值类型的模板(与形参一起使用)

${return_type} ${name} = null;

if (${var} != null) {
    ${name} = new ${return_type}();
    ${cursor}
}
return ${name};

添加迭代Map.entrySet()的代码片段:

模板:

${:import(java.util.Map.Entry)}
for (Entry<${keyType:argType(map, 0)}, ${valueType:argType(map, 1)}> ${entry} : ${map:var(java.util.Map)}.entrySet())
{
    ${keyType} ${key} = ${entry}.getKey();
    ${valueType} ${value} = ${entry}.getValue();
    ${cursor}
}

生成的代码:

for (Entry<String, String> entry : properties.entrySet())
{
    String key = entry.getKey();
    String value = entry.getValue();
    |
}

EasyMock模板

创建模拟

${:importStatic(org.easymock.EasyMock.createMock)}
${type} ${name} = createMock(${type}.class);

重置模拟

${:importStatic(org.easymock.EasyMock.reset)}
reset(${var});

回放模拟

${:importStatic(org.easymock.EasyMock.replay)}
replay(${var});

验证模拟

${:importStatic(org.easymock.EasyMock.verify)}
verify(${var});

在Java 7之后，设置需要(或更喜欢)对外围类的静态引用的记录器的一个好方法是使用新引入的MethodHandles API在静态上下文中获取运行时类。

SLF4J的一个示例片段是:

private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MethodHandles.lookup().lookupClass());

除了在任何IDE中都是一个简单的代码片段外，如果您将某些功能重构到另一个类中，它也不会那么脆弱，因为您不会意外地携带类名。