问题和答案都不符合我简单的思考方式。我是一名顾问，并与许多开发团队和DevOps人员同步了这些定义，但我很好奇它如何与整个行业相匹配:

基本上，我认为持续交付的敏捷实践就像一个连续体:

非连续(一切手工)0% ----> 100%持续交付价值(一切自动化)

实现持续交付的步骤:

零。当开发人员签入代码时，没有什么是自动的……如果他们在签入之前已经编译、运行或执行了任何测试，那么您就很幸运了。

Continuous Build: automated build on every check-in, which is the first step, but does nothing to prove functional integration of new code. Continuous Integration (CI): automated build and execution of at least unit tests to prove integration of new code with existing code, but preferably integration tests (end-to-end). Continuous Deployment (CD): automated deployment when code passes CI at least into a test environment, preferably into higher environments when quality is proven either via CI or by marking a lower environment as PASSED after manual testing. I.E., testing may be manual in some cases, but promoting to next environment is automatic. Continuous Delivery: automated publication and release of the system into production. This is CD into production plus any other configuration changes like setup for A/B testing, notification to users of new features, notifying support of new version and change notes, etc.

EDIT: I would like to point out that there's a difference between the concept of "continuous delivery" as referenced in the first principle of the Agile Manifesto (http://agilemanifesto.org/principles.html) and the practice of Continuous Delivery, as seems to be referenced by the context of the question. The principle of continuous delivery is that of striving to reduce the Inventory waste as described in Lean thinking (http://www.miconleansixsigma.com/8-wastes.html). The practice of Continuous Delivery (CD) by agile teams has emerged in the many years since the Agile Manifesto was written in 2001. This agile practice directly addresses the principle, although they are different things and apparently easily confused.

根据我和Alex Cowan在持续交付和开发运维课程中所学到的，CI和CD是产品管道的一部分，包括从观察到发布产品的时间。

从观察到设计的目标是得到高质量的可测试的想法。这部分过程被认为是持续设计。

之后发生的事情，当我们从代码开始，它被认为是一种持续交付能力，其目标是非常快速地执行想法并发布给客户(你可以阅读Jez Humble的书《持续交付:通过构建、测试和部署自动化的可靠软件发布》了解更多细节)。下面的管道说明持续集成(CI)和持续交付(CD)由哪些步骤组成。

持续集成，正如Mattias Petter Johansson解释的那样，

当一个软件团队有每天进行多次合并的习惯时 他们有一个自动验证系统来检查这些 合并问题。

(您可以观看以下两个视频，以获得使用CircleCI -开始使用CircleCI -持续集成P2和在拉请求上运行CircleCI的更实际的概述)。

可以像下面这样指定CI/CD管道，从新代码到发布的产品。

前三个步骤与测试有关，扩展被测试对象的边界。

另一方面，持续部署是自动处理部署。因此，任何通过自动化测试阶段的代码提交都会自动发布到生产环境中。

注意:这并不一定是您的管道应该是什么样的，但它们可以作为参考。

DevOps是3C的组合——持续、沟通、协作，这导致了各个行业的主要关注。

在物联网连接设备的世界中，产品所有者、web、移动和QA等多种scrum功能以敏捷的方式在scrum周期中工作，将产品交付给最终客户。

持续集成:多个scrum特性在多个端点同时工作 持续交付:通过集成和部署，同时向多个客户交付产品。 持续部署:在多个平台上将多个产品部署到多个客户。

观看此视频，了解DevOps如何实现物联网连接的世界:https://youtu.be/nAfZt2t4HqA

问题和答案都不符合我简单的思考方式。我是一名顾问，并与许多开发团队和DevOps人员同步了这些定义，但我很好奇它如何与整个行业相匹配:

基本上，我认为持续交付的敏捷实践就像一个连续体:

非连续(一切手工)0% ----> 100%持续交付价值(一切自动化)

实现持续交付的步骤:

零。当开发人员签入代码时，没有什么是自动的……如果他们在签入之前已经编译、运行或执行了任何测试，那么您就很幸运了。

Continuous Build: automated build on every check-in, which is the first step, but does nothing to prove functional integration of new code. Continuous Integration (CI): automated build and execution of at least unit tests to prove integration of new code with existing code, but preferably integration tests (end-to-end). Continuous Deployment (CD): automated deployment when code passes CI at least into a test environment, preferably into higher environments when quality is proven either via CI or by marking a lower environment as PASSED after manual testing. I.E., testing may be manual in some cases, but promoting to next environment is automatic. Continuous Delivery: automated publication and release of the system into production. This is CD into production plus any other configuration changes like setup for A/B testing, notification to users of new features, notifying support of new version and change notes, etc.

EDIT: I would like to point out that there's a difference between the concept of "continuous delivery" as referenced in the first principle of the Agile Manifesto (http://agilemanifesto.org/principles.html) and the practice of Continuous Delivery, as seems to be referenced by the context of the question. The principle of continuous delivery is that of striving to reduce the Inventory waste as described in Lean thinking (http://www.miconleansixsigma.com/8-wastes.html). The practice of Continuous Delivery (CD) by agile teams has emerged in the many years since the Agile Manifesto was written in 2001. This agile practice directly addresses the principle, although they are different things and apparently easily confused.

持续集成:是开发人员尽可能频繁地将对代码库的更改合并到主分支的实践。通过创建构建，然后对构建运行自动化测试来验证这些更改。如果这些测试没有通过，更改就不会合并，开发人员就会避免可能发生的集成挑战。

Continuous Delivery : is an extension of CI since it enables automation to deploy all the code changes to an environment (dev, qa, stage, prod, etc) after the changes have been merged. The artifact may be built as part of CI or as part of this process since the source of truth (your repository) is reliable given your CI process. In simple terms, this means that there is an automated release process on top of the automated testing process and that developers can deploy their changes at any time by simply clicking a button or at the completion of CI.

持续部署:比持续交付更进一步。在这里，在管道的每个阶段通过验证步骤的所有更改都将发布到生产环境中。这个过程是完全自动化的，只有一个失败的验证步骤才能阻止将更改推到生产环境中。

持续集成

自动化(签入+单元测试的构建)

持续交付

持续集成 自动化(部署到测试环境+负载测试+集成测试) 手动(从部署到生产)

持续部署

持续交付但自动化(部署到生产)

CI/CD是一段旅程。不是目的地。

These stages are suggestions. You can adapt the stages based on your business need. Some stages can be repeated for multiple types of testing, security, and performance. Depending on the complexity of your project and the structure of your teams, some stages can be repeated several times at different levels. For example, the end product of one team can become a dependency in the project of the next team. This means that the first team’s end product is subsequently staged as an artifact in the next team’s project.

补充说明:

连续练习 集成与持续 AWS交付