对于我正在从事的一个新的node.js项目,我正在考虑从基于cookie的会话方法(我的意思是,将id存储到用户浏览器中包含用户会话的键值存储中)切换到使用JSON Web Tokens (jwt)的基于令牌的会话方法(没有键值存储)。

这个项目是一个利用socket的游戏。IO——在一个会话(web和socket.io)中有多个通信通道的情况下,有一个基于令牌的会话会很有用。

如何使用jwt方法从服务器提供令牌/会话失效?

我还想了解使用这种范例应该注意哪些常见的(或不常见的)陷阱/攻击。例如,如果这种模式容易受到与基于会话存储/cookie的方法相同/不同类型的攻击。

所以,假设我有以下内容(改编自this和this):

会话存储登录:

app.get('/login', function(request, response) {
    var user = {username: request.body.username, password: request.body.password };
    // Validate somehow
    validate(user, function(isValid, profile) {
        // Create session token
        var token= createSessionToken();

        // Add to a key-value database
        KeyValueStore.add({token: {userid: profile.id, expiresInMinutes: 60}});

        // The client should save this session token in a cookie
        response.json({sessionToken: token});
    });
}

口令登录:

var jwt = require('jsonwebtoken');
app.get('/login', function(request, response) {
    var user = {username: request.body.username, password: request.body.password };
    // Validate somehow
    validate(user, function(isValid, profile) {
        var token = jwt.sign(profile, 'My Super Secret', {expiresInMinutes: 60});
        response.json({token: token});
    });
}

--

会话存储方法的注销(或失效)需要更新KeyValueStore 使用指定的令牌创建数据库。

在基于令牌的方法中似乎不存在这样的机制,因为令牌本身将包含通常存在于键值存储中的信息。


当前回答

您可以在用户的文档/记录上的DB上有一个“last_key_used”字段。

当用户使用user和pass登录时,生成一个新的随机字符串,将其存储在last_key_used字段中,并在签名令牌时将其添加到负载中。

当用户使用令牌登录时,检查数据库中的last_key_used是否与令牌中的last_key_used匹配。

然后,当用户执行注销操作时,或者如果您想使令牌失效,只需将“last_key_used”字段更改为另一个随机值,随后的任何检查都将失败,从而迫使用户使用user登录并再次通过。

其他回答

以下方法可以提供两全其美的解决方案:

让“立即”表示“~1分钟”。

例:

User attempts a successful login: A. Add an "issue time" field to the token, and keep the expiry time as needed. B. Store the hash of user's password's hash or create a new field say tokenhash in the user's table. Store the tokenhash in the generated token. User accesses a url: A. If the "issue time" is in the "immediate" range, process the token normally. Don't change the "issue time". Depending upon the duration of "immediate" this is the duration one is vulnerable in. But a short duration like a minute or two shouldn't be too risky. (This is a balance between performance and security). Three is no need to hit the db here. B. If the token is not in the "immediate" range, check the tokenhash against the db. If its okay, update the "issue time" field. If not okay then don't process the request (Security is finally enforced). User changes the tokenhash to secure the account. In the "immediate" future the account is secured.

我们将数据库查询保存在“immediate”范围内。 如果在“即时”持续时间内有来自客户端的大量请求,那么这是最有益的。

上面的想法很好,但是有一种非常简单的方法可以使所有现有的jwt无效,那就是简单地改变秘密。

如果您的服务器创建了JWT,用一个秘密(JWS)对其进行签名,然后将其发送给客户端,简单地更改秘密将使所有现有的令牌无效,并要求所有用户获得一个新的令牌进行身份验证,因为他们的旧令牌突然根据服务器变得无效。

它不需要对实际的令牌内容(或查找ID)进行任何修改。

显然,这仅适用于当您希望所有现有令牌过期时的紧急情况,对于每个令牌过期,需要上述解决方案之一(例如短令牌过期时间或令牌内存储的密钥无效)。

没有使用jwt的刷新…

我想到了两种袭击的场景。一个是关于登录凭证的泄露。另一个是对JWT的盗窃。

For compromised login credentials, when a new login happens, normally send the user an email notification. So, if the customer doesn't consent to being the one who logged in, they should be advised to do a reset of credentials, which should save to database/cache the date-time the password was last set (and set this too when user sets password during initial registration). Whenever a user action is being authorized, the date-time a user changed their password should be fetched from database/cache and compared to the date-time a given JWT was generated, and forbid the action for JWTs that were generated before the said date-time of credentials reset, hence essentially rendering such JWTs useless. That means save the date-time of generation of a JWT as a claim in the JWT itself. In ASP.NET Core, a policy/requirement can be used to do do this comparison, and on failure, the client is forbidden. This consequently logs out the user on the backend, globally, whenever a reset of credentials is done.

For actual theft of JWT... A theft of JWT is not easy to detect but a JWT that expires easily solves this. But what can be done to stop the attacker before the JWT expires? It is with an actual global logout. It is similar to what was described above for credentials reset. For this, normally save on database/cache the date-time a user initiated a global logout, and on authorizing a user action, get it and compare it to the date-time of generation of a given JWT too, and forbid the action for JWTs that were generated before the said date-time of global logout, hence essentially rendering such JWTs useless. This can be done using a policy/requirement in ASP.NET Core, as previously described.

现在,你如何发现JWT被盗?目前我对此的回答是,偶尔提醒用户全局注销并重新登录,因为这肯定会让攻击者注销。

简单地创建添加以下对象到你的用户模式:

const userSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
{
... your schema code,
destroyAnyJWTbefore: Date
}

当你在/login上收到POST请求时,将这个文档的日期更改为date .now()

最后,在您的身份验证检查代码中,即在您的中间件中检查isauthenticated或protected或任何您使用的名称,只需添加一个检查myjwt的验证。iat大于userDoc.destroyAnyJWTbefore。

如果您想在服务器端销毁JWT,那么在安全性方面,这个解决方案是最好的。 这个解决方案不再依赖于客户端,它打破了使用jwt的主要目标,即停止在服务器端存储令牌。 这取决于您的项目上下文,但最可能的是您想要从服务器上销毁JWT。

如果您只想从客户端销毁令牌,只需从浏览器中删除cookie(如果您的客户端是浏览器),在智能手机或任何其他客户端上也可以这样做。

如果选择从服务器端销毁令牌,我建议您使用Radis通过实现其他用户提到的黑名单样式来快速执行此操作。

现在的主要问题是:jwt无用吗?上帝知道。

I ended up with access-refresh tokens, where refresh tokens uuids stored in database and access tokens uuids stored in cache server as a whitelist of valid access tokens. For example, I have critical changes in user data, for example, his access rights, next thing I do - I remove his access token from cache server whitelist and by the next access to any resource of my api, auth service will be asked for token's validity, then, if it isn't present in cache server whitelist, I will reject user's access token and force him to reauthorize by refresh token. If I want to drop user's session or all of his sessions, I simply drop all his tokens from whitelist and remove refresh tokens from database, so he musts re-enter credentials to continue accessing resources.

我知道,我的身份验证不再是无状态的,但公平地说,我为什么还要无状态的身份验证呢?