我通常使用以下习语来检查String是否可以转换为整数。
public boolean isInteger( String input ) {
try {
Integer.parseInt( input );
return true;
}
catch( Exception e ) {
return false;
}
}
是我的错觉，还是你觉得这有点粗俗?还有什么更好的办法吗?
看看我的回答(带有基准，基于CodingWithSpike之前的回答)，看看为什么我改变了立场，接受了Jonas Klemming对这个问题的回答。我认为大多数人都会使用这个原始代码，因为它实现起来更快，也更易于维护，但是当提供非整数数据时，它就慢了几个数量级。
当前回答
您可以尝试apache utils
NumberUtils.isCreatable(myText)
点击这里查看javadoc
其他回答
Integer.valueOf(string);
大部分时间对我都管用!
org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils.isNumeric
尽管Java的标准库确实缺少这样的实用函数
我认为Apache Commons是每个Java程序员的“必备”
可惜它还没有移植到Java5
I recently (today) needed to figure out a quick way to do this and of course I was going to use the exception approach for ease when the monkey on the shoulder (conscience) woke up so it took me down this old familiar rabbit hole; no exceptions are not that much more expensive in fact sometimes exceptions are faster (old AIX multiprocessor systems) but regardless it’s to elegant so I did something that the younger me never did and to my amazement nobody here did either (apologize if someone did and I missed it I honestly did not find) : so what did I think we all missed; taking a look at how the JRE implemented it, yes they threw an exception but we can always skip that part.
10年前年轻的我可能会觉得这有失他的身份，但话又说回来，他是一个大嘴巴的炫耀者，性情不好，有一种神的情结，所以就是这样。
我把这些放在这里，是为了方便将来来这里的人。以下是我的发现:
public static int parseInt(String s, int radix) throws NumberFormatException
{
/*
* WARNING: This method may be invoked early during VM initialization
* before IntegerCache is initialized. Care must be taken to not use
* the valueOf method.
*/
if (s == null) {
throw new NumberFormatException("null");
}
if (radix < Character.MIN_RADIX) {
throw new NumberFormatException("radix " + radix +
" less than Character.MIN_RADIX");
}
if (radix > Character.MAX_RADIX) {
throw new NumberFormatException("radix " + radix +
" greater than Character.MAX_RADIX");
}
int result = 0;
boolean negative = false;
int i = 0, len = s.length();
int limit = -Integer.MAX_VALUE;
int multmin;
int digit;
if (len > 0) {
char firstChar = s.charAt(0);
if (firstChar < '0') { // Possible leading "+" or "-"
if (firstChar == '-') {
negative = true;
limit = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
} else if (firstChar != '+')
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
if (len == 1) // Cannot have lone "+" or "-"
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
i++;
}
multmin = limit / radix;
while (i < len) {
// Accumulating negatively avoids surprises near MAX_VALUE
digit = Character.digit(s.charAt(i++),radix);
if (digit < 0) {
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
}
if (result < multmin) {
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
}
result *= radix;
if (result < limit + digit) {
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
}
result -= digit;
}
} else {
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
}
return negative ? result : -result;
}
Number number;
try {
number = NumberFormat.getInstance().parse("123");
} catch (ParseException e) {
//not a number - do recovery.
e.printStackTrace();
}
//use number
对于kotlin，字符串的isDigitsOnly()(同样对于Java的TextUtils.isDigitsOnly())总是返回false，它前面有一个负号，尽管字符的其余部分仅为数字。例如:
/** For kotlin*/
var str = "-123"
str.isDigitsOnly() //Result will be false
/** For Java */
String str = "-123"
TextUtils.isDigitsOnly(str) //Result will be also false
所以我做了一个快速的修正
var isDigit=str.matches("-?\\d+(\\.\\d+)?".toRegex())
/** Result will be true for now*/
