HashMap绝对不保证迭代顺序。它 当添加新元素时，甚至会完全改变。 TreeMap将根据键的“自然顺序”进行迭代 根据它们的compareTo()方法(或外部提供的 比较器)。此外，它实现了SortedMap接口， 其中包含依赖于此排序顺序的方法。LinkedHashMap 将按照条目放入映射中的顺序进行迭代

看看性能是如何变化的。

树映射是排序映射的实现。由于自然排序，put、get和containsKey操作的复杂度为O(log n)

这三个都表示从唯一键到值的映射，因此实现了Map接口。

HashMap is a map based on hashing of the keys. It supports O(1) get/put operations. Keys must have consistent implementations of hashCode() and equals() for this to work. LinkedHashMap is very similar to HashMap, but it adds awareness to the order at which items are added (or accessed), so the iteration order is the same as insertion order (or access order, depending on construction parameters). TreeMap is a tree based mapping. Its put/get operations take O(log n) time. It requires items to have some comparison mechanism, either with Comparable or Comparator. The iteration order is determined by this mechanism.

@Amit: SortedMap is an interface whereas TreeMap is a class which implements the SortedMap interface. That means if follows the protocol which SortedMap asks its implementers to do. A tree unless implemented as search tree, can't give you ordered data because tree can be any kind of tree. So to make TreeMap work like Sorted order, it implements SortedMap ( e.g, Binary Search Tree - BST, balanced BST like AVL and R-B Tree , even Ternary Search Tree - mostly used for iterative searches in ordered way ).

public class TreeMap<K,V>
extends AbstractMap<K,V>
implements SortedMap<K,V>, Cloneable, Serializable

在坚果壳 HashMap:给出O(1)的数据，没有排序

TreeMap:给出O(log N)，以2为底的数据。使用有序键

LinkedHashMap:是具有链表(想想索引- skiplist)功能的哈希表，以插入树的方式存储数据。最适合实现LRU(最近最少使用)。

它们都提供一个key->值映射和一种遍历键的方法。最重要的区别 这些类是时间保证和键的顺序。

HashMap offers 0(1) lookup and insertion. If you iterate through the keys, though, the ordering of the keys is essentially arbitrary. It is implemented by an array of linked lists. TreeMap offers O(log N) lookup and insertion. Keys are ordered, so if you need to iterate through the keys in sorted order, you can. This means that keys must implement the Comparable interface.TreeMap is implemented by a Red-Black Tree. LinkedHashMap offers 0(1) lookup and insertion. Keys are ordered by their insertion order. It is implemented by doubly-linked buckets.

假设你将一个空的TreeMap, HashMap和LinkedHashMap传递给下面的函数:

void insertAndPrint(AbstractMap<Integer, String> map) {
  int[] array= {1, -1, 0};
  for (int x : array) {
    map.put(x, Integer.toString(x));
  }
  for (int k: map.keySet()) {
   System.out.print(k + ", ");
  }
}

它们的输出如下所示。

对于HashMap，在我自己的测试中，输出是{0,1，-1}，但它可以是任何顺序。没有任何保证 排序。 Treemap，输出为{- 1,0,1} LinkedList，输出为{1，-1,0}

以下是HashMap和TreeMap之间的主要区别

HashMap does not maintain any order. In other words , HashMap does not provide any guarantee that the element inserted first will be printed first, where as Just like TreeSet , TreeMap elements are also sorted according to the natural ordering of its elements Internal HashMap implementation use Hashing and TreeMap internally uses Red-Black tree implementation. HashMap can store one null key and many null values.TreeMap can not contain null keys but may contain many null values. HashMap take constant time performance for the basic operations like get and put i.e O(1).According to Oracle docs , TreeMap provides guaranteed log(n) time cost for the get and put method. HashMap is much faster than TreeMap, as performance time of HashMap is constant against the log time TreeMap for most operations. HashMap uses equals() method in comparison while TreeMap uses compareTo() method for maintaining ordering. HashMap implements Map interface while TreeMap implements NavigableMap interface.

HashMap: 不维持秩序 比LinkedHashMap快 用于存储对象堆 LinkedHashMap: LinkedHashMap插入顺序将被维持 比HashMap慢，比TreeMap快 如果你想保持一个插入顺序，使用这个。 TreeMap: TreeMap是一种基于树的映射 TreeMap将遵循键的自然顺序 比HashMap和LinkedHashMap慢 在需要维护自然(默认)排序时使用TreeMap