这是我迄今为止遇到的最愚蠢的错误。我有一个片段应用程序工作完美的API < 11，并强制关闭API > 11。

我真的不知道他们在saveInstance调用的活动生命周期内改变了什么，但我在这里是我如何解决这个问题的:

@Override
protected void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
    //No call for super(). Bug on API Level > 11.
}

我只是不调用.super()，一切都很好。我希望这将为您节省一些时间。

编辑:经过进一步研究，这是支持包中的一个已知错误。

如果你需要保存实例，并添加一些东西到你的outState Bundle，你可以使用以下方法:

@Override
protected void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
    outState.putString("WORKAROUND_FOR_BUG_19917_KEY", "WORKAROUND_FOR_BUG_19917_VALUE");
    super.onSaveInstanceState(outState);
}

EDIT2:如果您试图在Activity在后台消失后执行事务，也可能会发生这种情况。为了避免这种情况，你应该使用commitAllowingStateLoss()

EDIT3: The above solutions were fixing issues in the early support.v4 libraries from what I can remember. But if you still have issues with this you MUST also read @AlexLockwood 's blog : Fragment Transactions & Activity State Loss Summary from the blog post (but I strongly recommend you to read it) : NEVER commit() transactions after onPause() on pre-Honeycomb, and onStop() on post-Honeycomb Be careful when committing transactions inside Activity lifecycle methods. Use onCreate(), onResumeFragments() and onPostResume() Avoid performing transactions inside asynchronous callback methods Use commitAllowingStateLoss() only as a last resort

简单有效的解决方案:

遵循简单的步骤:

步骤1:在各自的片段中覆盖onSaveInstanceState状态。并从中移除super method。

@Override
public void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
};

步骤2:使用CommitAllowingStateLoss();而不是commit();而片段操作。

fragmentTransaction.commitAllowingStateLoss();

这对我很管用……我自己发现的…希望对你有所帮助!

1)不要有全局的“静态”FragmentManager / FragmentTransaction。

2) onCreate，总是初始化FragmentManager再次!

样本如下:-

public abstract class FragmentController extends AnotherActivity{
protected FragmentManager fragmentManager;
protected FragmentTransaction fragmentTransaction;
protected Bundle mSavedInstanceState;

@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
    super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
    mSavedInstanceState = savedInstanceState;
    setDefaultFragments();
}

protected void setDefaultFragments() {
    fragmentManager = getSupportFragmentManager();
    //check if on orientation change.. do not re-add fragments!
    if(mSavedInstanceState == null) {
        //instantiate the fragment manager

        fragmentTransaction = fragmentManager.beginTransaction();

        //the navigation fragments
        NavigationFragment navFrag = new NavigationFragment();
        ToolbarFragment toolFrag = new ToolbarFragment();

        fragmentTransaction.add(R.id.NavLayout, navFrag, "NavFrag");
        fragmentTransaction.add(R.id.ToolbarLayout, toolFrag, "ToolFrag");
        fragmentTransaction.commitAllowingStateLoss();

        //add own fragment to the nav (abstract method)
        setOwnFragment();
    }
}

只需在显示你的片段之前调用super.onPostResume()，或者在调用super.onPostResume()之后在onPostResume()方法中移动你的代码。这就解决了问题!

在屏幕被锁定\blank并且Activity +对话框的实例状态被保存之后，在对话框片段上调用dismiss()也会发生这种情况。要绕过这个调用:

dismissAllowingStateLoss()

实际上，每次我解散一个对话框时，我都不再关心它的状态了，所以这样做是可以的——实际上你并没有失去任何状态。

I noticed something very interesting. I have in my app the option to open the phone's gallery and the device asks what app to use, there I click on the gray area away from the dialog and saw this issue. I noticed how my activity goes from onPause, onSaveInstanceState back to onResume, it doesn't happen to visit onCreateView. I am doing transactions at onResume. So what I ended up doing is setting a flag being negated onPause, but being true onCreateView. if the flag is true onResume then do onCommit, otherwise commitAllowingStateLoss. I could go on and waste so much time but I wanted to check the lifecycle. I have a device which is sdkversion 23, and I don't get this issue, but I have another one which is 21, and there I see it.