我发现，如果另一个应用程序是对话类型，并允许触摸被发送到后台应用程序，那么几乎任何后台应用程序都会崩溃与此错误。 我认为我们需要在每次执行事务时检查实例是否保存或恢复。

我在我的应用程序中有同样的问题。我已经解决了这个问题，只是调用super.onBackPressed();并在当前类上调用commitAllowingStateLoss()。

解决这个问题的另一种生命周期方法是使用kotlin最新发布的lifecycle-ktx。

lifecycleScope.launchWhenResumed {
    // your code with fragment or dialogfragment
}

闭包将在恢复状态后运行，因此甚至在恢复状态后调用此方法 停，等下一份简历来的时候就安全执行了。

你也可以选择喜欢

lifecycleScope.launchWhenCreated
// or
lifecycleScope.launchWhenStarted

适合你的情况。

当销毁完成时，代码将被取消。

谷歌文档链接: https://developer.android.com/kotlin/ktx#lifecycle

我认为在这些操作之前调用FragmentActivity.onStateNotSaved()可能是目前最好的选择。

在Android源代码中查找导致此问题的原因，给出FragmentManagerImpl类(Activity中可用的实例)中的标记mStateSaved的值为true。当Activity#onSaveInstanceState调用后堆栈被保存(saveAllState)时，它被设置为true。 之后，来自ActivityThread的调用不会使用FragmentManagerImpl#noteStateNotSaved()和dispatch()中的可用重置方法重置该标志。

在我看来，有一些可用的修复，这取决于你的应用程序正在做什么和使用:

的好方法

首先，我要为Alex Lockwood的文章做广告。然后，根据我目前所做的:

For fragments and activities that don't need to keep any state information, call commitAllowStateLoss. Taken from documentation: Allows the commit to be executed after an activity's state is saved. This is dangerous because the commit can be lost if the activity needs to later be restored from its state, so this should only be used for cases where it is okay for the UI state to change unexpectedly on the user`. I guess this is alright to use if the fragment is showing read-only information. Or even if they do show editable info, use the callbacks methods to retain the edited info. Just after the transaction is commit (you just called commit()), make a call to FragmentManager.executePendingTransactions().

不推荐的方法:

As Ovidiu Latcu mentioned above, don't call super.onSaveInstanceState(). But this means you will lose the whole state of your activity along with fragments state. Override onBackPressed and in there call only finish(). This should be OK if you application doesn't use Fragments API; as in super.onBackPressed there is a call to FragmentManager#popBackStackImmediate(). If you are using both Fragments API and the state of your activity is important/vital, then you could try to call using reflection API FragmentManagerImpl#noteStateNotSaved(). But this is a hack, or one could say it's a workaround. I don't like it, but in my case it's quite acceptable since I have a code from a legacy app that uses deprecated code (TabActivity and implicitly LocalActivityManager).

下面是使用反射的代码:

@Override
protected void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
    super.onSaveInstanceState(outState);
    invokeFragmentManagerNoteStateNotSaved();
}

@SuppressWarnings({ "rawtypes", "unchecked" })
private void invokeFragmentManagerNoteStateNotSaved() {
    /**
     * For post-Honeycomb devices
     */
    if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT < 11) {
        return;
    }
    try {
        Class cls = getClass();
        do {
            cls = cls.getSuperclass();
        } while (!"Activity".equals(cls.getSimpleName()));
        Field fragmentMgrField = cls.getDeclaredField("mFragments");
        fragmentMgrField.setAccessible(true);

        Object fragmentMgr = fragmentMgrField.get(this);
        cls = fragmentMgr.getClass();

        Method noteStateNotSavedMethod = cls.getDeclaredMethod("noteStateNotSaved", new Class[] {});
        noteStateNotSavedMethod.invoke(fragmentMgr, new Object[] {});
        Log.d("DLOutState", "Successful call for noteStateNotSaved!!!");
    } catch (Exception ex) {
        Log.e("DLOutState", "Exception on worka FM.noteStateNotSaved", ex);
    }
}

干杯!

我认为生命周期状态可以帮助防止这种崩溃从Android支持库v26.1.0开始，你可以有以下检查:

if (getLifecycle().getCurrentState().isAtLeast(Lifecycle.State.STARTED)){
  // Do fragment's transaction commit
}

或者你可以试试:

Fragment.isStateSaved()

更多信息请点击这里 https://developer.android.com/reference/android/support/v4/app/Fragment.html isStateSaved ()