假设这个字符串:
The fox jumped over the log.
变成:
The fox jumped over the log.
在不分割和进入列表的情况下,最简单的实现方法(1-2行)是什么?
假设这个字符串:
The fox jumped over the log.
变成:
The fox jumped over the log.
在不分割和进入列表的情况下,最简单的实现方法(1-2行)是什么?
当前回答
import re
Text = " You can select below trims for removing white space!! BR Aliakbar "
# trims all white spaces
print('Remove all space:',re.sub(r"\s+", "", Text), sep='')
# trims left space
print('Remove leading space:', re.sub(r"^\s+", "", Text), sep='')
# trims right space
print('Remove trailing spaces:', re.sub(r"\s+$", "", Text), sep='')
# trims both
print('Remove leading and trailing spaces:', re.sub(r"^\s+|\s+$", "", Text), sep='')
# replace more than one white space in the string with one white space
print('Remove more than one space:',re.sub(' +', ' ',Text), sep='')
结果:作为代码
"Remove all space:Youcanselectbelowtrimsforremovingwhitespace!!BRAliakbar"
"Remove leading space:You can select below trims for removing white space!! BR Aliakbar"
"Remove trailing spaces: You can select below trims for removing white space!! BR Aliakbar"
"Remove leading and trailing spaces:You can select below trims for removing white space!! BR Aliakbar"
"Remove more than one space: You can select below trims for removing white space!! BR Aliakbar"
其他回答
这个正是你想要的
old_string = 'The fox jumped over the log '
new_string = " ".join(old_string.split())
print(new_string)
将会导致
The fox jumped over the log.
" ".join(foo.split())对于所问的问题不太正确,因为它也完全删除了单个前导和/或尾随空格。所以,如果它们也将被1个空白替换,你应该像下面这样做:
" ".join(('*' + foo + '*').split()) [1:-1]
当然,它没有那么优雅。
最简单的解决方案!
a = 'The fox jumped over the log.'
while ' ' in a: a = a.replace(' ', ' ')
print(a)
输出:
The fox jumped over the log.
一个简单的灵魂
>>> import re
>>> s="The fox jumped over the log."
>>> print re.sub('\s+',' ', s)
The fox jumped over the log.
我不得不同意Paul McGuire的评论。对我来说,
' '.join(the_string.split())
比快速生成正则表达式要好得多。
我的测量结果(Linux和Python 2.5)显示,先分离后连接的速度几乎比“re.sub(…)”快5倍,如果你一次预编译正则表达式并多次执行该操作,速度仍然快3倍。而且无论从哪方面看,它都更容易理解——更python化。