文档很好地解释了apply()和commit()之间的区别:

Unlike commit(), which writes its preferences out to persistent storage synchronously, apply() commits its changes to the in-memory SharedPreferences immediately but starts an asynchronous commit to disk and you won't be notified of any failures. If another editor on this SharedPreferences does a regular commit() while a apply() is still outstanding, the commit() will block until all async commits are completed as well as the commit itself. As SharedPreferences instances are singletons within a process, it's safe to replace any instance of commit() with apply() if you were already ignoring the return value.

commit()和apply()的区别

当我们使用SharedPreference时，我们可能会被这两个术语混淆。基本上它们可能是相同的，因此让我们澄清commit()和apply()的区别。

1.返回值:

Apply()提交时不返回表示成功或失败的布尔值。 如果保存有效，Commit()返回true，否则返回false。

速度:

Apply()更快。 Commit()比较慢。

异步vs .同步:

应用():异步的 commit():同步

原子性:

应用():原子 commit():原子

错误通知:

应用():没有 commit():是的

tl; diana:

commit() writes the data synchronously (blocking the thread its called from). It then informs you about the success of the operation. apply() schedules the data to be written asynchronously. It does not inform you about the success of the operation. If you save with apply() and immediately read via any getX-method, the new value will be returned! If you called apply() at some point and it's still executing, any calls to commit() will block until all past apply-calls and the current commit-call are finished.

更多深入的信息来自SharedPreferences。编辑文档:

Unlike commit(), which writes its preferences out to persistent storage synchronously, apply() commits its changes to the in-memory SharedPreferences immediately but starts an asynchronous commit to disk and you won't be notified of any failures. If another editor on this SharedPreferences does a regular commit() while a apply() is still outstanding, the commit() will block until all async commits are completed as well as the commit itself. As SharedPreferences instances are singletons within a process, it's safe to replace any instance of commit() with apply() if you were already ignoring the return value. The SharedPreferences.Editor interface isn't expected to be implemented directly. However, if you previously did implement it and are now getting errors about missing apply(), you can simply call commit() from apply().

文档很好地解释了apply()和commit()之间的区别:

Unlike commit(), which writes its preferences out to persistent storage synchronously, apply() commits its changes to the in-memory SharedPreferences immediately but starts an asynchronous commit to disk and you won't be notified of any failures. If another editor on this SharedPreferences does a regular commit() while a apply() is still outstanding, the commit() will block until all async commits are completed as well as the commit itself. As SharedPreferences instances are singletons within a process, it's safe to replace any instance of commit() with apply() if you were already ignoring the return value.

Commit()是同步的，apply()是异步的 Apply()是void函数。 如果新值成功写入持久存储，Commit()返回true。 apply()保证在切换状态之前完成，你不需要担心Android组件的生命周期

如果你不使用commit()返回的值，而你在主线程中使用commit()，请使用apply()而不是commit()

我使用apply()而不是commit()遇到了一些问题。正如前面在其他响应中所述，apply()是异步的。我得到的问题是，形成一个“字符串集”偏好的变化从来没有写到持久内存。

如果你“强制扣留”程序，或者在我安装在Android 4.1设备上的ROM中，由于内存需求进程被系统杀死，就会发生这种情况。

如果你想激活你的首选项，我建议使用“commit()”而不是“apply()”。