我想在while循环中添加一个delay/sleep:

我是这样试的:

alert('hi');

for(var start = 1; start < 10; start++) {
  setTimeout(function () {
    alert('hello');
  }, 3000);
}

只有第一种情况是正确的:在显示alert('hi')后,它将等待3秒,然后alert('hello')将显示,但随后alert('hello')将不断重复。

我想要的是,在警报('hello')显示3秒后警报('hi'),然后它需要等待3秒的第二次警报('hello'),以此类推。


当前回答

var startIndex = 0; Var数据= [1,2,3]; Var超时= 1000; 函数functionToRun(i, length) { 警报(数据[我]); } (函数forWithDelay(i, length, fn, delay) { setTimeout(函数(){ fn(我、长度); 我+ +; If (i < length) { forWithDelay(i, length, fn, delay); } },延迟); }) (startIndex数据。length, functionToRun, timeout);

Daniel Vassallo回答的修改版本,将变量提取为参数,使函数更具可重用性:

首先让我们定义一些基本变量:

var startIndex = 0;
var data = [1, 2, 3];
var timeout = 3000;

接下来,您应该定义要运行的函数。这将传递i,循环的当前索引和循环的长度,以防你需要它:

function functionToRun(i, length) {
    alert(data[i]);
}

Self-executing版本

(function forWithDelay(i, length, fn, delay) {
   setTimeout(function () {
      fn(i, length);
      i++;
      if (i < length) {
         forWithDelay(i, length, fn, delay); 
      }
  }, delay);
})(startIndex, data.length, functionToRun, timeout);

功能版

function forWithDelay(i, length, fn, delay) {
   setTimeout(function () {
      fn(i, length);
      i++;
      if (i < length) {
         forWithDelay(i, length, fn, delay); 
      }
  }, delay);
}

forWithDelay(startIndex, data.length, functionToRun, timeout); // Lets run it

其他回答

我认为你需要这样的东西:

var TimedQueue = function(defaultDelay){
    this.queue = [];
    this.index = 0;
    this.defaultDelay = defaultDelay || 3000;
};

TimedQueue.prototype = {
    add: function(fn, delay){
        this.queue.push({
            fn: fn,
            delay: delay
        });
    },
    run: function(index){
        (index || index === 0) && (this.index = index);
        this.next();
    },
    next: function(){
        var self = this
        , i = this.index++
        , at = this.queue[i]
        , next = this.queue[this.index]
        if(!at) return;
        at.fn();
        next && setTimeout(function(){
            self.next();
        }, next.delay||this.defaultDelay);
    },
    reset: function(){
        this.index = 0;
    }
}

测试代码:

var now = +new Date();

var x = new TimedQueue(2000);

x.add(function(){
    console.log('hey');
    console.log(+new Date() - now);
});
x.add(function(){
    console.log('ho');
    console.log(+new Date() - now);
}, 3000);
x.add(function(){
    console.log('bye');
    console.log(+new Date() - now);
});

x.run();

注意:使用警报暂停javascript执行,直到你关闭警报。 它的代码可能比您要求的要多,但这是一个健壮的可重用解决方案。

在ES6 (ECMAScript 2015)中,您可以使用生成器和间隔迭代延迟。

生成器(generator)是ECMAScript 6的一个新特性,是可以被替换的函数 顿了顿,接着说。调用genFunc不会执行它。相反,它 返回一个所谓的生成器对象,让我们控制genFunc的 执行。genFunc()最初是挂起在它的开始 的身体。方法genObj.next()继续执行genFunc, 直到下一次丰收。 (探索ES6)

代码示例: Let arr = [1,2,3, 'b']; let genObj = genFunc(); let val = genObj.next(); console.log (val.value); let interval = setInterval(() => { val = genObj.next(); If (val.done) { clearInterval(间隔); }其他{ console.log (val.value); } }, 1000); 函数* genFunc() { For (let item of arr) { 收益项; } }

所以如果你正在使用ES6,这是实现延迟循环的最优雅的方式(在我看来)。

/* 
  Use Recursive  and setTimeout 
  call below function will run loop loopFunctionNeedCheck until 
  conditionCheckAfterRunFn = true, if conditionCheckAfterRunFn == false : delay 
  reRunAfterMs miliseconds and continue loop
  tested code, thanks
*/

function functionRepeatUntilConditionTrue(reRunAfterMs, conditionCheckAfterRunFn,
 loopFunctionNeedCheck) {
    loopFunctionNeedCheck();
    var result = conditionCheckAfterRunFn();
    //check after run
    if (!result) {
        setTimeout(function () {
            functionRepeatUntilConditionTrue(reRunAfterMs, conditionCheckAfterRunFn, loopFunctionNeedCheck)
        }, reRunAfterMs);
    }
    else  console.log("completed, thanks");    
            //if you need call a function after completed add code call callback in here
}

//passing-parameters-to-a-callback-function
// From Prototype.js 
if (!Function.prototype.bind) { // check if native implementation available
    Function.prototype.bind = function () {
        var fn = this, args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments),
            object = args.shift();
        return function () {
            return fn.apply(object,
              args.concat(Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments)));
        };
    };
}

//test code: 
var result = 0; 
console.log("---> init result is " + result);
var functionNeedRun = function (step) {           
   result+=step;    
       console.log("current result is " + result);  
}
var checkResultFunction = function () {
    return result==100;
}  

//call this function will run loop functionNeedRun and delay 500 miliseconds until result=100    
functionRepeatUntilConditionTrue(500, checkResultFunction , functionNeedRun.bind(null, 5));

//result log from console:
/*
---> init result is 0
current result is 5
undefined
current result is 10
current result is 15
current result is 20
current result is 25
current result is 30
current result is 35
current result is 40
current result is 45
current result is 50
current result is 55
current result is 60
current result is 65
current result is 70
current result is 75
current result is 80
current result is 85
current result is 90
current result is 95
current result is 100
completed, thanks
*/
const autoPlayer = (arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]) => {
  // Base case:
  if (arr.length < 1) return

  // Remove the first element from the array.
  const item = arr.shift()

  // Set timout 
  setTimeout(() => {
    console.log('Hello, world!', item)  // Visualisation.
    autoPlayer() // Call function again.
  }, 1000) // Iterate every second.
}

Hey, I know this post is very old, but this code "loops" and adds a delay to it using a recursive method. I don't think you can 'actually' delay a loop itself from iterating based on reading various comments from other people. Maybe this can help someone out! Basically the function accepts an array (in this example). On each iteration the setTimeout Javascript method is called. The function calls itself again indefinitely when the timer of the setTimeout function expires, but on each call the array becomes smaller until it reaches the base-case. I hope this can help anyone else out.

非常简单的单行解决方案,具有实际的异步等待延迟(没有排队setTimeout):

下面的(自动执行匿名)函数在循环之间创建一个实际的延迟,而不是具有不同超时的多个settimeout,这可能会弄乱内存。

在100个循环中的每一个循环中,它都等待一个新的承诺来解决。 这只发生在setTimeout '允许'它在90ms后。在此之前,代码将被async-await / pending Promise阻塞。

(async () => { For(令i=0;我< 100;我+ +){ 等待新的承诺((resolve) => {setTimeout(() =>{文档。我写(“${}”);解决(true)}, 90)}); } })()