public static string Reverse(string input)
{
    return string.Concat(Enumerable.Reverse(input));
}

当然，您可以使用Reverse方法扩展字符串类

public static class StringExtensions
{
    public static string Reverse(this string input)
    {
        return string.Concat(Enumerable.Reverse(input));
    }
}

public string rev(string str)
{
    if (str.Length <= 0)
        return string.Empty;
    else
        return str[str.Length-1]+ rev(str.Substring(0,str.Length-1));
}

必须提交一个递归的例子:

private static string Reverse(string str)
{
    if (str.IsNullOrEmpty(str) || str.Length == 1)
        return str;
    else
        return str[str.Length - 1] + Reverse(str.Substring(0, str.Length - 1));
}

string A = null;
//a now is reversed and you can use it
A = SimulateStrReverse.StrReverse("your string");

public static class SimulateStrReverse
{
    public static string StrReverse(string expression)
    {
        if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(expression))
            return string.Empty;

        string reversedString = string.Empty;
        for (int charIndex = expression.Length - 1; charIndex >= 0; charIndex--)
        {
            reversedString += expression[charIndex];
        }
        return reversedString;
    }
}

Greg Beech发布了一个不安全的选项，它确实很快(这是一个原地逆转);但是，正如他在回答中指出的那样，这完全是一个灾难性的想法。

也就是说，我很惊讶有这么多的共识，Array。逆向是最快的方法。仍然有一种不安全的方法，它返回字符串的反向副本(没有原地反转的恶作剧)，比Array快得多。小字符串的反向方法:

public static unsafe string Reverse(string text)
{
    int len = text.Length;

    // Why allocate a char[] array on the heap when you won't use it
    // outside of this method? Use the stack.
    char* reversed = stackalloc char[len];

    // Avoid bounds-checking performance penalties.
    fixed (char* str = text)
    {
        int i = 0;
        int j = i + len - 1;
        while (i < len)
        {
            reversed[i++] = str[j--];
        }
    }

    // Need to use this overload for the System.String constructor
    // as providing just the char* pointer could result in garbage
    // at the end of the string (no guarantee of null terminator).
    return new string(reversed, 0, len);
}

以下是一些基准测试结果。

您可以看到，相对于Array，性能增益会缩小，然后消失。当字符串变大时，反向方法。然而，对于小型到中型的字符串，很难击败这种方法。

private static string Reverse(string str)
        {
            string revStr = string.Empty;
            for (int i = str.Length - 1; i >= 0; i--)
            {
                revStr += str[i].ToString();
            }
            return revStr;
        }

比上述方法快

private static string ReverseEx(string str)
        {
            char[] chrArray = str.ToCharArray();
            int len = chrArray.Length - 1;
            char rev = 'n';
            for (int i = 0; i <= len/2; i++)
            {
                rev = chrArray[i];
                chrArray[i] = chrArray[len - i];
                chrArray[len - i] = rev;
            }
            return new string(chrArray);
        }