为了给出一个动态内存使用方面，我做了一个实验，在重物的重负载下，将强、软、弱和幻影引用保留到程序结束。然后监控堆使用和GC行为。这些指标可能因情况而异，但肯定能提供高层次的理解。以下是调查结果。

重负载下的堆和GC行为

Strong/Hard Reference - As program continued, JVM couldn't collect retained strong referenced object. Eventually ended up in "java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space" Soft Reference - As program continued, heap usage kept growing, but OLD gen GC happened hen it was nearing max heap. GC started bit later in time after starting program. Weak Reference - As program started, objects started finalizing & getting collected almost immediately. Mostly objects got collected in young generation garbage collection. Phantom Reference - Similar to weak reference, phantom referenced objects also started getting finalized & garbage collected immediately. There were no old generation GC & all objects were getting collected in young generation garbage collection itself.

你可以在这里获得更多关于这个实验的深度图表、统计数据和观察结果。

软引用和弱引用之间唯一真正的区别是

垃圾收集器使用算法来决定是否 回收软可达对象，但总是回收弱可达对象 可访问的对象。

唯一真正的区别

根据文档，松散的weakreference必须由正在运行的GC清除。

根据文档，在抛出OOM之前必须清除松散的softreference。

这是唯一真正的区别。其他的都不是合同的一部分。(我假设最新的文件是合同文件。)

软引用很有用。内存敏感的缓存使用软引用，而不是弱引用。 WeakReference的唯一正确用法是观察GC运行。为此，您可以创建一个新的WeakReference，其对象立即超出作用域，然后尝试从weak_ref.get()中获取null。当它为空时，您可以了解到在此期间GC运行了。

关于WeakReference的错误使用，列表是无限的:

a lousy hack to implement priority-2 softreference such that you don't have to write one, yet it doesn't work as expected because the cache would be cleared on every GC run, even when there is spare memory. See https://stackoverflow.com/a/3243242/632951 for phails. (Besides, what if you need more than 2 levels of cache priority? You'd still gotta need a real library for it.) a lousy hack to associate data with an object of an existing class, yet it creates a memory leak (OutOfMemoryError) when your GC decides to take a break after your weakreferences are created. Besides, it's beyond ugly: A better approach is to use tuples. a lousy hack to associate data with an object of an existing class, where the class has the nerve to make itself non-subclassable, and is used in an existing function code which you need to call. In such a case, the proper solution is to either edit the class and make it subclassable, or edit the function and make it take an interface instead of a class, or use an alternative function.

在Java中;从强到弱依次为:强、软、弱、幻

强引用是一种普通引用，用于保护被引用的对象不被GC收集。即从不收集垃圾。

软引用可以被垃圾回收器收集，但可能直到需要它的内存时才会被收集。即在OutOfMemoryError之前进行垃圾收集。

弱引用是指不保护被引用对象不被GC收集的引用。即，当没有强或软引用时，垃圾收集。

幻影引用是在对象完成后，但在已分配的内存被回收之前，对对象的幻影引用。

源

类比:假设JVM是一个王国，对象是王国的国王，GC是王国的攻击者，试图杀死国王(对象)。

当国王强大时，GC不能杀死他。 当国王是软的，GC攻击他，但国王统治王国的保护，直到资源可用。 当国王虚弱时，GC攻击他，但在没有保护的情况下统治王国。 当国王是幻影时，GC已经杀死了他，但国王可以通过他的灵魂获得。

WeakReference:只弱引用的对象将在每个GC周期(minor或full)收集。

SoftReference:当只被软引用的对象被收集时，取决于:

-XX:SoftRefLRUPolicyMSPerMB=N标志(默认值是1000，也就是1秒) 堆中的空闲内存量。 例子: 堆有10MB的空闲空间(在完全GC之后); - xx: SoftRefLRUPolicyMSPerMB = 1000 如果只被SoftReference引用的对象上次被访问的时间大于10秒，则该对象将被收集。

摘自Ethan Nicholas的《理解弱引用》:

Weak references A weak reference, simply put, is a reference that isn't strong enough to force an object to remain in memory. Weak references allow you to leverage the garbage collector's ability to determine reachability for you, so you don't have to do it yourself. You create a weak reference like this: WeakReference weakWidget = new WeakReference(widget); and then elsewhere in the code you can use weakWidget.get() to get the actual Widget object. Of course the weak reference isn't strong enough to prevent garbage collection, so you may find (if there are no strong references to the widget) that weakWidget.get() suddenly starts returning null. ... Soft references A soft reference is exactly like a weak reference, except that it is less eager to throw away the object to which it refers. An object which is only weakly reachable (the strongest references to it are WeakReferences) will be discarded at the next garbage collection cycle, but an object which is softly reachable will generally stick around for a while. SoftReferences aren't required to behave any differently than WeakReferences, but in practice softly reachable objects are generally retained as long as memory is in plentiful supply. This makes them an excellent foundation for a cache, such as the image cache described above, since you can let the garbage collector worry about both how reachable the objects are (a strongly reachable object will never be removed from the cache) and how badly it needs the memory they are consuming.

Peter Kessler补充道:

The Sun JRE does treat SoftReferences differently from WeakReferences. We attempt to hold on to object referenced by a SoftReference if there isn't pressure on the available memory. One detail: the policy for the "-client" and "-server" JRE's are different: the -client JRE tries to keep your footprint small by preferring to clear SoftReferences rather than expand the heap, whereas the -server JRE tries to keep your performance high by preferring to expand the heap (if possible) rather than clear SoftReferences. One size does not fit all.