Bash模式返回标量和数组值对象:

定义

url_parse() { # parse 'url' into: 'url_host', 'url_port', ...
   local "$@" # inject caller 'url' argument in local scope
   local url_host="..." url_path="..." # calculate 'url_*' components
   declare -p ${!url_*} # return only 'url_*' object fields to the caller
}

调用

main() { # invoke url parser and inject 'url_*' results in local scope
   eval "$(url_parse url=http://host/path)" # parse 'url'
   echo "host=$url_host path=$url_path" # use 'url_*' components
}

在我的程序中，按照约定，这就是预先存在的$REPLY变量的用途，read正是为此目的而使用它。

function getSomeString {
  REPLY="tadaa"
}

getSomeString
echo $REPLY

这种回声

tadaa

但是为了避免冲突，任何其他全局变量都可以。

declare result

function getSomeString {
  result="tadaa"
}

getSomeString
echo $result

如果这还不够，我推荐Markarian451的解决方案。

没有比这更好的方法了。Bash只知道写入标准输出的状态码(整数)和字符串。

They key problem of any 'named output variable' scheme where the caller can pass in the variable name (whether using eval or declare -n) is inadvertent aliasing, i.e. name clashes: From an encapsulation point of view, it's awful to not be able to add or rename a local variable in a function without checking ALL the function's callers first to make sure they're not wanting to pass that same name as the output parameter. (Or in the other direction, I don't want to have to read the source of the function I'm calling just to make sure the output parameter I intend to use is not a local in that function.)

解决这个问题的唯一方法是使用一个单独的专用输出变量，比如REPLY(由ev1m4chine建议)，或者使用Ron Burk建议的约定。

但是，也可以让函数在内部使用固定的输出变量，然后在上面添加一些糖来对调用者隐藏这一事实，就像我在下面的示例中对call函数所做的那样。把这看作是概念的证明，但关键是

该函数总是将返回值赋给REPLY，也可以像往常一样返回退出码 从调用者的角度来看，返回值可以分配给任何变量(本地或全局)，包括REPLY(参见包装器示例)。函数的退出码是传递的，因此在if或while或类似结构中使用它们可以正常工作。 从语法上讲，函数调用仍然是一条简单的语句。

这样做的原因是调用函数本身没有局部变量，并且除了REPLY之外不使用其他变量，从而避免了任何名称冲突的可能性。当调用方定义的输出变量名被赋值时，我们实际上处于调用方的作用域(技术上讲，在调用函数的相同作用域中)，而不是在被调用函数的作用域中。

#!/bin/bash
function call() { # var=func [args ...]
  REPLY=; "${1#*=}" "${@:2}"; eval "${1%%=*}=\$REPLY; return $?"
}

function greet() {
  case "$1" in
    us) REPLY="hello";;
    nz) REPLY="kia ora";;
    *) return 123;;
  esac
}

function wrapper() {
  call REPLY=greet "$@"
}

function main() {
  local a b c d
  call a=greet us
  echo "a='$a' ($?)"
  call b=greet nz
  echo "b='$b' ($?)"
  call c=greet de
  echo "c='$c' ($?)"
  call d=wrapper us
  echo "d='$d' ($?)"
}
main

输出:

a='hello' (0)
b='kia ora' (0)
c='' (123)
d='hello' (0)

像上面的bstpierre一样，我使用并推荐使用显式命名输出变量:

function some_func() # OUTVAR ARG1
{
   local _outvar=$1
   local _result # Use some naming convention to avoid OUTVARs to clash
   ... some processing ....
   eval $_outvar=\$_result # Instead of just =$_result
}

注意引用$的用法。这将避免将$result中的内容解释为shell特殊字符。我发现这比result=$(some_func "arg1")捕获回声的习惯用法快一个数量级。在MSYS上使用bash时，速度差异似乎更加显著，从函数调用中捕获标准输出几乎是灾难性的。

可以发送一个局部变量，因为局部变量在bash中是动态作用域的:

function another_func() # ARG
{
   local result
   some_func result "$1"
   echo result is $result
}

Bash自2014年2月4.3版(?)起，除了“eval”之外，还明确支持引用变量或名称引用(namerefs)，具有相同的性能和间接效果，并且在你的脚本中可能更清晰，也更难“忘记'eval'而不得不修复此错误”:

declare [-aAfFgilnrtux] [-p] [name[=value] ...]
typeset [-aAfFgilnrtux] [-p] [name[=value] ...]
  Declare variables and/or give them attributes
  ...
  -n Give each name the nameref attribute, making it a name reference
     to another variable.  That other variable is defined by the value
     of name.  All references and assignments to name, except for⋅
     changing the -n attribute itself, are performed on the variable
     referenced by name's value.  The -n attribute cannot be applied to
     array variables.
...
When used in a function, declare and typeset make each name local,
as with the local command, unless the -g option is supplied...

还有:

PARAMETERS A variable can be assigned the nameref attribute using the -n option to the declare or local builtin commands (see the descriptions of declare and local below) to create a nameref, or a reference to another variable. This allows variables to be manipulated indirectly. Whenever the nameref variable is⋅ referenced or assigned to, the operation is actually performed on the variable specified by the nameref variable's value. A nameref is commonly used within shell functions to refer to a variable whose name is passed as an argument to⋅ the function. For instance, if a variable name is passed to a shell function as its first argument, running declare -n ref=$1 inside the function creates a nameref variable ref whose value is the variable name passed as the first argument. References and assignments to ref are treated as references and assignments to the variable whose name was passed as⋅ $1. If the control variable in a for loop has the nameref attribute, the list of words can be a list of shell variables, and a name reference will be⋅ established for each word in the list, in turn, when the loop is executed. Array variables cannot be given the -n attribute. However, nameref variables can reference array variables and subscripted array variables. Namerefs can be⋅ unset using the -n option to the unset builtin. Otherwise, if unset is executed with the name of a nameref variable as an argument, the variable referenced by⋅ the nameref variable will be unset.

例如(EDIT 2:(谢谢你Ron)在函数内部变量名的命名空间(前缀)，以最小化外部变量冲突，这最终应该正确地回答了Karsten在评论中提出的问题):

# $1 : string; your variable to contain the return value
function return_a_string () {
    declare -n ret=$1
    local MYLIB_return_a_string_message="The date is "
    MYLIB_return_a_string_message+=$(date)
    ret=$MYLIB_return_a_string_message
}

测试这个例子:

$ return_a_string result; echo $result
The date is 20160817

请注意，bash“declare”内置在函数中使用时，默认情况下会使声明的变量为“local”，并且“-n”也可以与“local”一起使用。

我更喜欢区分“重要的声明”变量和“无聊的本地”变量，因此以这种方式使用“声明”和“本地”作为文档。

编辑1 -(对Karsten下面的评论的回应)-我不能再在下面添加评论了，但Karsten的评论让我思考，所以我做了以下测试，工作良好，AFAICT - Karsten如果你读了这篇文章，请从命令行提供一组准确的测试步骤，显示你假设存在的问题，因为以下步骤工作得很好:

$ return_a_string ret; echo $ret
The date is 20170104

(我刚刚将上面的函数粘贴到bash术语中后运行了这个程序——正如您所看到的，结果运行得很好。)