也许你应该用这样的东西

npm ci

而不是使用npm install 如果您不想更改包的版本。

根据官方文档，npm install和npm ci都安装了项目所需的依赖项。

主要的区别是，npm install确实使用package来安装包。Json作为引用。在npm ci的情况下，它确实使用package-lock来安装包。Json作为参考，确保每次安装的包都是正确的。

也许你应该用这样的东西

npm ci

而不是使用npm install 如果您不想更改包的版本。

根据官方文档，npm install和npm ci都安装了项目所需的依赖项。

主要的区别是，npm install确实使用package来安装包。Json作为引用。在npm ci的情况下，它确实使用package-lock来安装包。Json作为参考，确保每次安装的包都是正确的。

在他们的github页面上有一个公开的问题:https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/18712

当开发人员使用不同的操作系统时，这个问题最为严重。

你可能会遇到这样的情况:

"typescript":"~2.1.6"

在你的包裹里。NPM将它更新到最新的小版本，在你的例子中是2.4.1

Edit: Question from OP But that doesn't explain why "npm install" would change the lock file. Isn't the lock file meant to create a reproducible build? If so, regardless of the semver value, it should still use the same 2.1.6 version. Answer: This is intended to lock down your full dependency tree. Let's say typescript v2.4.1 requires widget ~v1.0.0. When you npm install it grabs widget v1.0.0. Later on your fellow developer (or CI build) does an npm install and gets typescript v2.4.1 but widget has been updated to widget v1.0.1. Now your node module are out of sync. This is what package-lock.json prevents. Or more generally: As an example, consider package A: { "name": "A", "version": "0.1.0", "dependencies": { "B": "<0.1.0" } } package B: { "name": "B", "version": "0.0.1", "dependencies": { "C": "<0.1.0" } } and package C: { "name": "C", "version": "0.0.1" } If these are the only versions of A, B, and C available in the registry, then a normal npm install A will install: A@0.1.0 -- B@0.0.1 -- C@0.0.1 However, if B@0.0.2 is published, then a fresh npm install A will install: A@0.1.0 -- B@0.0.2 -- C@0.0.1 assuming the new version did not modify B's dependencies. Of course, the new version of B could include a new version of C and any number of new dependencies. If such changes are undesirable, the author of A could specify a dependency on B@0.0.1. However, if A's author and B's author are not the same person, there's no way for A's author to say that he or she does not want to pull in newly published versions of C when B hasn't changed at all.

OP Question 2: So let me see if I understand correctly. What you're saying is that the lock file specifies the versions of the secondary dependencies, but still relies on the fuzzy matching of package.json to determine the top-level dependencies. Is that accurate? Answer: No. package-lock locks the entire package tree, including the root packages described in package.json. If typescript is locked at 2.4.1 in your package-lock.json, it should remain that way until it is changed. And lets say tomorrow typescript releases version 2.4.2. If I checkout your branch and run npm install, npm will respect the lockfile and install 2.4.1.

关于package-lock.json的更多信息:

package-lock。当NPM修改node_modules树或package.json时，Json会自动生成。它描述了生成的确切的树，以便后续安装能够生成相同的树，而不考虑中间依赖项更新。

该文件旨在提交到源存储库中，并用于各种目的:

Describe a single representation of a dependency tree such that teammates, deployments, and continuous integration are guaranteed to install exactly the same dependencies. Provide a facility for users to "time-travel" to previous states of node_modules without having to commit the directory itself. To facilitate greater visibility of tree changes through readable source control diffs. And optimize the installation process by allowing npm to skip repeated metadata resolutions for previously-installed packages.

https://docs.npmjs.com/files/package-lock.json

使用npm ci命令代替npm install。

ci代表clean install。

它将基于包锁安装项目依赖项。Json文件，而不是宽大的包。Json文件依赖关系。

它将生成与团队成员相同的构建，并且速度更快。

你可以在这篇博客文章中阅读更多信息: https://blog.npmjs.org/post/171556855892/introducing-npm-ci-for-faster-more-reliable

将来，您将能够使用——from-lock-file(或类似的)标志仅从包锁安装。Json而不修改它。

这对于CI等环境非常有用，因为这些环境中可复制的构建非常重要。

有关该特性的跟踪，请参见https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/18286。