不，我认为标准JavaScript没有内置这个功能，但Prototype JS有这个功能(当然大多数其他JS框架也有，但我不知道它们)，他们称之为序列化。

I can reccomend Prototype JS, it works quite okay. The only drawback I've really noticed it it's size (a few hundred kb) and scope (lots of code for ajax, dom, etc.). Thus if you only want a form serializer it's overkill, and strictly speaking if you only want it's Ajax functionality (wich is mainly what I used it for) it's overkill. Unless you're careful you may find that it does a little too much "magic" (like extending every dom element it touches with Prototype JS functions just to find elements) making it slow on extreme cases.

如果您不想使用库，这应该涵盖大多数/所有相同的表单元素类型。

function serialize(form) {
  if (!form || !form.elements) return;

  var serial = [], i, j, first;
  var add = function (name, value) {
    serial.push(encodeURIComponent(name) + '=' + encodeURIComponent(value));
  }

  var elems = form.elements;
  for (i = 0; i < elems.length; i += 1, first = false) {
    if (elems[i].name.length > 0) { /* don't include unnamed elements */
      switch (elems[i].type) {
        case 'select-one': first = true;
        case 'select-multiple':
          for (j = 0; j < elems[i].options.length; j += 1)
            if (elems[i].options[j].selected) {
              add(elems[i].name, elems[i].options[j].value);
              if (first) break; /* stop searching for select-one */
            }
          break;
        case 'checkbox':
        case 'radio': if (!elems[i].checked) break; /* else continue */
        default: add(elems[i].name, elems[i].value); break;
      }
    }
  }

  return serial.join('&');
}

不，我认为标准JavaScript没有内置这个功能，但Prototype JS有这个功能(当然大多数其他JS框架也有，但我不知道它们)，他们称之为序列化。

I can reccomend Prototype JS, it works quite okay. The only drawback I've really noticed it it's size (a few hundred kb) and scope (lots of code for ajax, dom, etc.). Thus if you only want a form serializer it's overkill, and strictly speaking if you only want it's Ajax functionality (wich is mainly what I used it for) it's overkill. Unless you're careful you may find that it does a little too much "magic" (like extending every dom element it touches with Prototype JS functions just to find elements) making it slow on extreme cases.

创建一个URL对象并将值附加到seachParameters

let stringUrl = "http://www.google.com/search";
let url = new URL(stringUrl);
let params = url.searchParams;
params.append("q", "This is seach query");

console.log(url.toString());

输出将是

http://www.google.com/search?q=This+is+seach+query

UrlSearchParams API是一个很好的建议，但我不敢相信没有人提到非常有用的.get和.set方法。它们可以用于操作查询字符串，不仅非常容易使用，还可以解决您可能遇到的许多问题。例如，在我的例子中，我想构建一个没有重复键的查询字符串。.set为您解决了这个问题。引用MDN文档:

URLSearchParams.set () 将与给定搜索参数关联的值设置为给定值。如果有多个值，则删除其他值。

示例(来自MDN):

let url = new URL('https://example.com?foo=1&bar=2');
let params = new URLSearchParams(url.search);

// Add a third parameter
params.set('baz', 3);

params.toString(); // "foo=1&bar=2&baz=3"

另一种更短的语法:

let url = new URL('https://example.com?foo=1&bar=2');

// Add a third parameter
url.searchParams.set('baz', 3);

url.searchParams.toString(); // "foo=1&bar=2&baz=3"

可能有点多余，但我找到的最干净的方法是建立在这里的一些答案上:

const params: {
   key1: 'value1',
   key2: 'value2',
   key3: 'value3',
}

const esc = encodeURIComponent;
const query = Object.keys(params)
  .map(k => esc(k) + '=' + esc(params[k]))
  .join('&');

return fetch('my-url', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: {'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'},
  body: query,
})

源