基于以上所有内容，我建议使用稍微修改过的版本(python3):

while循环调用readline (iter建议的解决方案似乎永远阻塞我- Python 3, Windows 7) 结构化的，因此在轮询返回not- none后不需要重复读取数据的处理 Stderr管道到stdout，因此两个输出输出都被读取 增加了获取cmd退出值的代码。

代码:

import subprocess
proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
                        stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, universal_newlines=True)
while True:
    rd = proc.stdout.readline()
    print(rd, end='')  # and whatever you want to do...
    if not rd:  # EOF
        returncode = proc.poll()
        if returncode is not None:
            break
        time.sleep(0.1)  # cmd closed stdout, but not exited yet

# You may want to check on ReturnCode here

在我看来，“来自subprocess命令的实时输出”意味着stdout和stderr都应该是实时的。stdin也应该被传递给子进程。

下面的片段在stdout和stderr上生成实时输出，并在outcome.{stdout,stderr}中将它们作为字节捕获。

窍门包括正确使用select和poll。

在Python 3.9上运行良好。

        if self.log == 1:
            print(f"** cmnd= {fullCmndStr}")

        self.outcome.stdcmnd = fullCmndStr
        try:
            process = subprocess.Popen(
                fullCmndStr,
                shell=True,
                encoding='utf8',
                executable="/bin/bash",
                stdin=subprocess.PIPE,
                stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
                stderr=subprocess.PIPE,
            )
        except OSError:
            self.outcome.error = OSError
        else:
            process.stdin.write(stdin)
            process.stdin.close() # type: ignore

        stdoutStrFile = io.StringIO("")
        stderrStrFile = io.StringIO("")

        pollStdout = select.poll()
        pollStderr = select.poll()

        pollStdout.register(process.stdout, select.POLLIN)
        pollStderr.register(process.stderr, select.POLLIN)

        stdoutEOF = False
        stderrEOF = False

        while True:
            stdoutActivity = pollStdout.poll(0)
            if stdoutActivity:
                c= process.stdout.read(1)
                if c:
                    stdoutStrFile.write(c)
                    if self.log == 1:
                        sys.stdout.write(c)
                else:
                   stdoutEOF = True

            stderrActivity = pollStderr.poll(0)
            if stderrActivity:
                c= process.stderr.read(1)
                if c:
                    stderrStrFile.write(c)
                    if self.log == 1:
                        sys.stderr.write(c)
                else:
                   stderrEOF = True
            if stdoutEOF and stderrEOF:
                break

        if self.log == 1:
            print(f"** cmnd={fullCmndStr}")

        process.wait() # type: ignore

        self.outcome.stdout = stdoutStrFile.getvalue()
        self.outcome.stderr = stderrStrFile.getvalue()
        self.outcome.error = process.returncode # type: ignore

Here is a class which I'm using in one of my projects. It redirects output of a subprocess to the log. At first I tried simply overwriting the write-method but that doesn't work as the subprocess will never call it (redirection happens on filedescriptor level). So I'm using my own pipe, similar to how it's done in the subprocess-module. This has the advantage of encapsulating all logging/printing logic in the adapter and you can simply pass instances of the logger to Popen: subprocess.Popen("/path/to/binary", stderr = LogAdapter("foo"))

class LogAdapter(threading.Thread):

    def __init__(self, logname, level = logging.INFO):
        super().__init__()
        self.log = logging.getLogger(logname)
        self.readpipe, self.writepipe = os.pipe()

        logFunctions = {
            logging.DEBUG: self.log.debug,
            logging.INFO: self.log.info,
            logging.WARN: self.log.warn,
            logging.ERROR: self.log.warn,
        }

        try:
            self.logFunction = logFunctions[level]
        except KeyError:
            self.logFunction = self.log.info

    def fileno(self):
        #when fileno is called this indicates the subprocess is about to fork => start thread
        self.start()
        return self.writepipe

    def finished(self):
       """If the write-filedescriptor is not closed this thread will
       prevent the whole program from exiting. You can use this method
       to clean up after the subprocess has terminated."""
       os.close(self.writepipe)

    def run(self):
        inputFile = os.fdopen(self.readpipe)

        while True:
            line = inputFile.readline()

            if len(line) == 0:
                #no new data was added
                break

            self.logFunction(line.strip())

如果您不需要日志记录，而只是想使用print()，显然可以删除大部分代码并使类更短。你也可以通过__enter__和__exit__方法来扩展它，并在__exit__中调用finished，这样你就可以很容易地将它用作上下文。

基于以上所有内容，我建议使用稍微修改过的版本(python3):

while循环调用readline (iter建议的解决方案似乎永远阻塞我- Python 3, Windows 7) 结构化的，因此在轮询返回not- none后不需要重复读取数据的处理 Stderr管道到stdout，因此两个输出输出都被读取 增加了获取cmd退出值的代码。

代码:

import subprocess
proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
                        stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, universal_newlines=True)
while True:
    rd = proc.stdout.readline()
    print(rd, end='')  # and whatever you want to do...
    if not rd:  # EOF
        returncode = proc.poll()
        if returncode is not None:
            break
        time.sleep(0.1)  # cmd closed stdout, but not exited yet

# You may want to check on ReturnCode here

import os

def execute(cmd, callback):
    for line in iter(os.popen(cmd).readline, ''): 
            callback(line[:-1])

execute('ls -a', print)

Python 3的TLDR:

import subprocess
import sys

with open("test.log", "wb") as f:
    process = subprocess.Popen(your_command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
    for c in iter(lambda: process.stdout.read(1), b""):
        sys.stdout.buffer.write(c)
        f.buffer.write(c)

你有两种方法来做到这一点，要么从read或readline函数创建一个迭代器，然后做:

import subprocess
import sys

# replace "w" with "wb" for Python 3
with open("test.log", "w") as f:
    process = subprocess.Popen(your_command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
    # replace "" with b'' for Python 3
    for c in iter(lambda: process.stdout.read(1), ""):
        sys.stdout.write(c)
        f.write(c)

or

import subprocess
import sys

# replace "w" with "wb" for Python 3
with open("test.log", "w") as f:
    process = subprocess.Popen(your_command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
    # replace "" with b"" for Python 3
    for line in iter(process.stdout.readline, ""):
        sys.stdout.write(line)
        f.write(line)

或者您可以创建一个读取器和一个写入器文件。将写入器传递给Popen并从读取器读取

import io
import time
import subprocess
import sys

filename = "test.log"
with io.open(filename, "wb") as writer, io.open(filename, "rb", 1) as reader:
    process = subprocess.Popen(command, stdout=writer)
    while process.poll() is None:
        sys.stdout.write(reader.read())
        time.sleep(0.5)
    # Read the remaining
    sys.stdout.write(reader.read())

通过这种方式，您可以将数据写入test.log和标准输出中。

文件方法的唯一优点是代码不会阻塞。因此，您可以在此期间做任何您想做的事情，并以无阻塞的方式随时从阅读器读取。当您使用PIPE时，read和readline函数将阻塞，直到分别将一个字符写入管道或将一行字符写入管道。