I'm using a python script as a driver for a hydrodynamics code. When it comes time to run the simulation, I use subprocess.Popen to run the code, collect the output from stdout and stderr into a subprocess.PIPE --- then I can print (and save to a log-file) the output information, and check for any errors. The problem is, I have no idea how the code is progressing. If I run it directly from the command line, it gives me output about what iteration its at, what time, what the next time-step is, etc.
是否有一种方法既存储输出(用于日志记录和错误检查)，又产生实时流输出?
我的代码的相关部分:
ret_val = subprocess.Popen( run_command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE, shell=True )
output, errors = ret_val.communicate()
log_file.write(output)
print output
if( ret_val.returncode ):
print "RUN failed\n\n%s\n\n" % (errors)
success = False
if( errors ): log_file.write("\n\n%s\n\n" % errors)
最初，我将run_command通过tee输送，以便将副本直接发送到日志文件，流仍然直接输出到终端——但这样我就不能存储任何错误(据我所知)。
目前我的临时解决方案是:
ret_val = subprocess.Popen( run_command, stdout=log_file, stderr=subprocess.PIPE, shell=True )
while not ret_val.poll():
log_file.flush()
然后，在另一个终端上运行tail -f log.txt (s.t. log_file = 'log.txt')。
基于以上所有内容，我建议使用稍微修改过的版本(python3):
while循环调用readline (iter建议的解决方案似乎永远阻塞我- Python 3, Windows 7)
结构化的，因此在轮询返回not- none后不需要重复读取数据的处理
Stderr管道到stdout，因此两个输出输出都被读取
增加了获取cmd退出值的代码。
代码:
import subprocess
proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, universal_newlines=True)
while True:
rd = proc.stdout.readline()
print(rd, end='') # and whatever you want to do...
if not rd: # EOF
returncode = proc.poll()
if returncode is not None:
break
time.sleep(0.1) # cmd closed stdout, but not exited yet
# You may want to check on ReturnCode here
我发现如何以流的方式读取子进程的输出(同时也在一个变量中捕获它)在Python中(对于多个输出流，即stdout和stderr)是通过传递子进程一个命名的临时文件来写入，然后在单独的读取句柄中打开相同的临时文件。
注意:这是针对Python 3的
stdout_write = tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile()
stdout_read = io.open(stdout_write.name, "r")
stderr_write = tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile()
stderr_read = io.open(stderr_write.name, "r")
stdout_captured = ""
stderr_captured = ""
proc = subprocess.Popen(["command"], stdout=stdout_write, stderr=stderr_write)
while True:
proc_done: bool = cli_process.poll() is not None
while True:
content = stdout_read.read(1024)
sys.stdout.write(content)
stdout_captured += content
if len(content) < 1024:
break
while True:
content = stderr_read.read(1024)
sys.stderr.write(content)
stdout_captured += content
if len(content) < 1024:
break
if proc_done:
break
time.sleep(0.1)
stdout_write.close()
stdout_read.close()
stderr_write.close()
stderr_read.close()
但是，如果您不需要捕获输出，那么您可以简单地传递sys。Stdout和sys。stderr流从你的Python脚本到被调用的子进程，正如xaav在他的回答中建议的那样:
subprocess.Popen(["command"], stdout=sys.stdout, stderr=sys.stderr)
我尝试过的所有上述解决方案都无法分离stderr和stdout输出(多个管道)，或者当操作系统管道缓冲区已满时永远阻塞，这发生在你运行输出太快的命令时(在python poll() subprocess手册上对此有警告)。我发现唯一可靠的方法是通过选择，但这是一个posix-only解决方案:
import subprocess
import sys
import os
import select
# returns command exit status, stdout text, stderr text
# rtoutput: show realtime output while running
def run_script(cmd,rtoutput=0):
p = subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
poller = select.poll()
poller.register(p.stdout, select.POLLIN)
poller.register(p.stderr, select.POLLIN)
coutput=''
cerror=''
fdhup={}
fdhup[p.stdout.fileno()]=0
fdhup[p.stderr.fileno()]=0
while sum(fdhup.values()) < len(fdhup):
try:
r = poller.poll(1)
except select.error, err:
if err.args[0] != EINTR:
raise
r=[]
for fd, flags in r:
if flags & (select.POLLIN | select.POLLPRI):
c = os.read(fd, 1024)
if rtoutput:
sys.stdout.write(c)
sys.stdout.flush()
if fd == p.stderr.fileno():
cerror+=c
else:
coutput+=c
else:
fdhup[fd]=1
return p.poll(), coutput.strip(), cerror.strip()
