I'm trying to create a thumbnail image on the client side using javascript and a canvas element, but when I shrink the image down, it looks terrible. It looks as if it was downsized in photoshop with the resampling set to 'Nearest Neighbor' instead of Bicubic. I know its possible to get this to look right, because this site can do it just fine using a canvas as well. I've tried using the same code they do as shown in the "[Source]" link, but it still looks terrible. Is there something I'm missing, some setting that needs to be set or something?

编辑:

我正在调整一张jpg图片的大小。我试过在链接的网站和photoshop中调整相同的jpg图片的大小,缩小后看起来很好。

以下是相关代码:

reader.onloadend = function(e)
{
    var img = new Image();
    var ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
    var canvasCopy = document.createElement("canvas");
    var copyContext = canvasCopy.getContext("2d");

    img.onload = function()
    {
        var ratio = 1;

        if(img.width > maxWidth)
            ratio = maxWidth / img.width;
        else if(img.height > maxHeight)
            ratio = maxHeight / img.height;

        canvasCopy.width = img.width;
        canvasCopy.height = img.height;
        copyContext.drawImage(img, 0, 0);

        canvas.width = img.width * ratio;
        canvas.height = img.height * ratio;
        ctx.drawImage(canvasCopy, 0, 0, canvasCopy.width, canvasCopy.height, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
    };

    img.src = reader.result;
}

EDIT2:

看来我错了,链接网站并没有做任何更好的工作缩小图像。我尝试了其他建议的方法,没有一个看起来更好。这就是不同方法的结果:

ps:

帆布:

使用图像渲染:optimizeQuality设置并按宽度/高度缩放:

使用-moz-transform设置和缩放:

Canvas在pixastic上调整大小:

我猜这意味着firefox没有像它应该的那样使用双三次抽样。我只能等他们真的加进去了。

EDIT3:

原始图像


当前回答

这是一个javascript函数改编自@Telanor的代码。当将图像base64作为第一个参数传递给函数时,它将返回调整后图像的base64。maxWidth和maxHeight是可选的。

function thumbnail(base64, maxWidth, maxHeight) {

  // Max size for thumbnail
  if(typeof(maxWidth) === 'undefined') var maxWidth = 500;
  if(typeof(maxHeight) === 'undefined') var maxHeight = 500;

  // Create and initialize two canvas
  var canvas = document.createElement("canvas");
  var ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
  var canvasCopy = document.createElement("canvas");
  var copyContext = canvasCopy.getContext("2d");

  // Create original image
  var img = new Image();
  img.src = base64;

  // Determine new ratio based on max size
  var ratio = 1;
  if(img.width > maxWidth)
    ratio = maxWidth / img.width;
  else if(img.height > maxHeight)
    ratio = maxHeight / img.height;

  // Draw original image in second canvas
  canvasCopy.width = img.width;
  canvasCopy.height = img.height;
  copyContext.drawImage(img, 0, 0);

  // Copy and resize second canvas to first canvas
  canvas.width = img.width * ratio;
  canvas.height = img.height * ratio;
  ctx.drawImage(canvasCopy, 0, 0, canvasCopy.width, canvasCopy.height, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);

  return canvas.toDataURL();

}

其他回答

我把@syockit的答案和降阶方法转换成了一个可重用的Angular服务,有兴趣的朋友可以访问:https://gist.github.com/fisch0920/37bac5e741eaec60e983

我包括了这两种解决方案,因为它们都有各自的优点和缺点。lanczos卷积方法的质量更高,但代价是速度较慢,而逐步降尺度方法产生了合理的抗锯齿结果,而且速度明显更快。

使用示例:

angular.module('demo').controller('ExampleCtrl', function (imageService) {
  // EXAMPLE USAGE
  // NOTE: it's bad practice to access the DOM inside a controller, 
  // but this is just to show the example usage.

  // resize by lanczos-sinc filter
  imageService.resize($('#myimg')[0], 256, 256)
    .then(function (resizedImage) {
      // do something with resized image
    })

  // resize by stepping down image size in increments of 2x
  imageService.resizeStep($('#myimg')[0], 256, 256)
    .then(function (resizedImage) {
      // do something with resized image
    })
})

如果你只是想调整图像的大小,我建议用CSS设置图像的宽度和高度。这里有一个简单的例子:

.small-image {
    width: 100px;
    height: 100px;
}

注意,高度和宽度也可以使用JavaScript设置。下面是快速代码示例:

var img = document.getElement("my-image");
img.style.width = 100 + "px";  // Make sure you add the "px" to the end,
img.style.height = 100 + "px"; // otherwise you'll confuse IE

此外,为了确保调整大小的图像看起来不错,在图像选择器中添加以下css规则:

-ms-interpolation-mode: bicubic:在IE7中引入 图像渲染:optimizeQuality:在FireFox 3.6中引入

据我所知,除了IE之外,所有浏览器都默认使用双三次算法来调整图像大小,所以你调整后的图像在Firefox和Chrome中应该看起来不错。

如果设置css的宽度和高度不工作,你可能想玩一个css转换:

-moz-transform: scale(sx[, sy]) -webkit-transform:规模(sx (sy))

如果出于任何原因你需要使用画布,请注意有两种方法可以调整图像的大小:通过css调整画布的大小或以较小的尺寸绘制图像。

请参阅这个问题了解更多细节。

其中一些解决方案的问题是,它们直接访问像素数据并通过它进行循环以执行下采样。根据图像的大小,这可能会非常消耗资源,最好使用浏览器的内部算法。

drawImage()函数使用线性插值、最近邻重采样方法。当您没有将大小调整到原来大小的一半以上时,这种方法效果很好。

如果循环一次只调整最大大小的一半,结果会非常好,而且比访问像素数据快得多。

这个函数每次采样到一半,直到达到所需的大小:

  function resize_image( src, dst, type, quality ) {
     var tmp = new Image(),
         canvas, context, cW, cH;

     type = type || 'image/jpeg';
     quality = quality || 0.92;

     cW = src.naturalWidth;
     cH = src.naturalHeight;

     tmp.src = src.src;
     tmp.onload = function() {

        canvas = document.createElement( 'canvas' );

        cW /= 2;
        cH /= 2;

        if ( cW < src.width ) cW = src.width;
        if ( cH < src.height ) cH = src.height;

        canvas.width = cW;
        canvas.height = cH;
        context = canvas.getContext( '2d' );
        context.drawImage( tmp, 0, 0, cW, cH );

        dst.src = canvas.toDataURL( type, quality );

        if ( cW <= src.width || cH <= src.height )
           return;

        tmp.src = dst.src;
     }

  }
  // The images sent as parameters can be in the DOM or be image objects
  resize_image( $( '#original' )[0], $( '#smaller' )[0] );

本文致谢

我有一种感觉,我写的模块将产生类似于photoshop的结果,因为它通过平均颜色数据来保存它们,而不是应用算法。它有点慢,但对我来说是最好的,因为它保留了所有的颜色数据。

https://github.com/danschumann/limby-resize/blob/master/lib/canvas_resize.js

它不会选取最近的邻居并删除其他像素,也不会对一组进行抽样并随机取平均值。它取每个源像素输出到目标像素的精确比例。源点的平均像素颜色就是目标点的平均像素颜色,我认为其他公式不是这样的。

如何使用的例子是在底部 https://github.com/danschumann/limby-resize

2018年10月更新:这些天我的例子比其他任何东西都更学术。Webgl几乎是100%,所以你最好用它来调整大小,以产生类似的结果,但更快。我相信PICA.js就是这么做的。- - - - - -

我通过右键单击firefox中的canvas元素并另存为来获得这张图像。

var img = new Image();
img.onload = function () {
    console.debug(this.width,this.height);
    var canvas = document.createElement('canvas'), ctx;
    canvas.width = 188;
    canvas.height = 150;
    document.body.appendChild(canvas);
    ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
    ctx.drawImage(img,0,0,188,150);
};
img.src = 'original.jpg';

不管怎样,这是你的例子的“固定”版本:

var img = new Image();
// added cause it wasnt defined
var canvas = document.createElement("canvas");
document.body.appendChild(canvas);

var ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
var canvasCopy = document.createElement("canvas");
// adding it to the body

document.body.appendChild(canvasCopy);

var copyContext = canvasCopy.getContext("2d");

img.onload = function()
{
        var ratio = 1;

        // defining cause it wasnt
        var maxWidth = 188,
            maxHeight = 150;

        if(img.width > maxWidth)
                ratio = maxWidth / img.width;
        else if(img.height > maxHeight)
                ratio = maxHeight / img.height;

        canvasCopy.width = img.width;
        canvasCopy.height = img.height;
        copyContext.drawImage(img, 0, 0);

        canvas.width = img.width * ratio;
        canvas.height = img.height * ratio;
        // the line to change
        // ctx.drawImage(canvasCopy, 0, 0, canvasCopy.width, canvasCopy.height, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
        // the method signature you are using is for slicing
        ctx.drawImage(canvasCopy, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
};

// changed for example
img.src = 'original.jpg';