我也投票给RazorSQL。它在许多方面都非常强大，实际上支持大多数数据库。我主要用于SQL Server, MySQL和PostgreSQL。

我使用Navicat客户端MySQL和PostgreSQL，我很满意他们。“好”显然是主观的……你如何评价你的DB客户?

这并没有明确地回答你的问题，因为我不确定Mac OS X中是否存在任何客户端，但我通常只是将远程桌面导入服务器并完成它。另一个选择是VMware Fusion(在我看来比Parallels好得多)+ Windows XP + SQL Server Management Studio。

出于这个目的，我使用Eclipse和Quantum-DB插件，因为我已经在使用Eclipse了。

When this question was asked there were very few tools out there were worth much. I also ended up using Fusion and a Windows client. I have tried just about everything for MAC and Linux and never found anything worthwhile. That included dbvisualizer, squirrel (particularly bad, even though the windows haters in my office swear by it), the oracle SQL developer and a bunch of others. Nothing compared to DBArtizan on Windows as far as I was concerned and I was prepared to use it with Fusion or VirtualBox. I don't use the MS product because it is only limited to MS SQL.

底线是没有免费的东西是值得的，大多数商业非视窗产品也是如此

However, now (March 2010) I believe there are two serious contenders and worthwhile versions for the MAC and Linux which have a low cost associated with them. The first one is Aqua Data Studio which costs about $450 per user, which is a barely acceptable, but cheap compared to DBArtizan and others with similar functionality (but MS only). The other is RazorSQL which only costs $69 per user. Aqua data studio is good, but a resource hog and basically pretty sluggish and has non essential features such as the ER diagram tool, which is pretty bad at that. The Razor is lightning fast and is only a 16meg download and has everything an SQL developer needs including a TSQL editor.

所以最大的赢家是RazorSQL，只要69美元，就物有所值。相信我，在等待了几年之后，我终于找到了一个便宜的非窗口DBartizan的替代品，我非常挑剔。

如果您还没有它，它可能不是最好的解决方案，但是FileMaker 11与实际的SQL Server ODBC驱动程序(http://www.actualtech.com/product_sqlserver.php)在我今天的一个客户端上运行得很好。ODBC驱动程序只要29美元，但FileMaker要299美元，这就是为什么只有在已经拥有它的情况下才考虑使用它的原因。