我已经升级了我的系统，并为我正在开发的web应用程序安装了MySql 5.7.9和php。我有一个查询，是动态创建的，当运行在旧版本的MySQL它工作得很好。自从升级到5.7，我得到这个错误:
SELECT列表的表达式#1不在GROUP BY子句中，并且包含
未聚合列的support_desk.mod_users_groups。Group_id '就是
在功能上不依赖于GROUP BY子句中的列;这是
sql_mode=only_full_group_by不兼容
请注意Mysql 5.7的手册页中关于Server SQL Modes的主题。
这个问题让我很困扰:
SELECT mod_users_groups.group_id AS 'value',
group_name AS 'text'
FROM mod_users_groups
LEFT JOIN mod_users_data ON mod_users_groups.group_id = mod_users_data.group_id
WHERE mod_users_groups.active = 1
AND mod_users_groups.department_id = 1
AND mod_users_groups.manage_work_orders = 1
AND group_name != 'root'
AND group_name != 'superuser'
GROUP BY group_name
HAVING COUNT(`user_id`) > 0
ORDER BY group_name
我不理解only_full_group_by，不足以弄清楚我需要做什么来修复查询。我是否可以关闭only_full_group_by选项，或者还有其他需要做的事情?
使用ANY_VALUE()引用未聚合的列。
SELECT name, address , MAX(age) FROM t GROUP BY name; -- fails
SELECT name, ANY_VALUE(address), MAX(age) FROM t GROUP BY name; -- works
从MySQL 5.7文档:
You can achieve the same effect without disabling ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY
by using ANY_VALUE() to refer to the nonaggregated column.
...
This query might be invalid with ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY enabled because the nonaggregated address column in the select list is not named in the GROUP BY clause:
SELECT name, address, MAX(age) FROM t GROUP BY name;
...
If you know that, for a given data set, each name value in fact uniquely determines the address value, address is effectively functionally dependent on name. To tell MySQL to accept the query, you can use the ANY_VALUE() function:
SELECT name, ANY_VALUE(address), MAX(age) FROM t GROUP BY name;
使用ANY_VALUE()引用未聚合的列。
SELECT name, address , MAX(age) FROM t GROUP BY name; -- fails
SELECT name, ANY_VALUE(address), MAX(age) FROM t GROUP BY name; -- works
从MySQL 5.7文档:
You can achieve the same effect without disabling ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY
by using ANY_VALUE() to refer to the nonaggregated column.
...
This query might be invalid with ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY enabled because the nonaggregated address column in the select list is not named in the GROUP BY clause:
SELECT name, address, MAX(age) FROM t GROUP BY name;
...
If you know that, for a given data set, each name value in fact uniquely determines the address value, address is effectively functionally dependent on name. To tell MySQL to accept the query, you can use the ANY_VALUE() function:
SELECT name, ANY_VALUE(address), MAX(age) FROM t GROUP BY name;
我使用Laravel 5.3, mysql 5.7.12，在Laravel homestead(0.5.0，我相信)
即使在显式地设置编辑/etc/mysql/my.cnf以反映:
[mysqld]
sql_mode = STRICT_TRANS_TABLES,NO_ZERO_IN_DATE,NO_ZERO_DATE,ERROR_FOR_DIVISION_BY_ZERO,NO_AUTO_CREATE_USER,NO_ENGINE_SUBSTITUTION
我仍然在接收错误。
我不得不改变config/database.php从true到false:
'mysql' => [
'strict' => false, //behave like 5.6
//'strict' => true //behave like 5.7
],
进一步阅读:
https://laracasts.com/discuss/channels/servers/set-set-sql-mode-on-homestead
https://mattstauffer.co/blog/strict-mode-and-other-mysql-customizations-in-laravel-5-2
我不得不在我的Ubuntu 18.04上编辑下面的文件:
/ etc / mysql / mysql上。d / mysqld cnf。
with
sql_mode=STRICT_TRANS_TABLES,NO_ZERO_IN_DATE,NO_ZERO_DATE,ERROR_FOR_DIVISION_BY_ZERO,NO_AUTO_CREATE_USER,NO_ENGINE_SUBSTITUTION
and
Sudo服务mysql重启
我只需将group_id添加到GROUP BY。
When SELECTing a column that is not part of the GROUP BY there could be multiple values for that column within the groups, but there will only be space for a single value in the results. So, the database usually needs to be told exactly how to make those multiple values into one value. Commonly, this is done with an aggregate function like COUNT(), SUM(), MAX() etc... I say usually because most other popular database systems insist on this. However, in MySQL prior to version 5.7 the default behaviour has been more forgiving because it will not complain and then arbitrarily choose any value! It also has an ANY_VALUE() function that could be used as another solution to this question if you really needed the same behaviour as before. This flexibility comes at a cost because it is non-deterministic, so I would not recommend it unless you have a very good reason for needing it. MySQL are now turning on the only_full_group_by setting by default for good reasons, so it's best to get used to it and make your queries comply with it.
那么为什么我的答案如此简单呢?我做了几个假设:
1) group_id是唯一的。看起来很合理，毕竟这是一个“ID”。
2) group_name也是唯一的。这可能不是一个合理的假设。如果不是这种情况，您有一些重复的group_name，然后按照我的建议将group_id添加到GROUP BY，您可能会发现现在得到的结果比以前更多，因为具有相同名称的组现在将在结果中有单独的行。对我来说，这比隐藏这些重复的组要好，因为数据库已经悄悄地任意选择了一个值!
当涉及多个表时，使用表名或别名限定所有列也是一种很好的实践……
SELECT
g.group_id AS 'value',
g.group_name AS 'text'
FROM mod_users_groups g
LEFT JOIN mod_users_data d ON g.group_id = d.group_id
WHERE g.active = 1
AND g.department_id = 1
AND g.manage_work_orders = 1
AND g.group_name != 'root'
AND g.group_name != 'superuser'
GROUP BY
g.group_name,
g.group_id
HAVING COUNT(d.user_id) > 0
ORDER BY g.group_name
