我需要一次执行一定数量的任务4，就像这样:
ExecutorService taskExecutor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4);
while(...) {
taskExecutor.execute(new MyTask());
}
//...wait for completion somehow
当所有这些都完成后，我如何得到通知?现在我想不出比设置一些全局任务计数器更好的方法，并在每个任务结束时减少它，然后在无限循环中监视这个计数器变成0;或获取一个期货列表，并在无限循环监视器isDone为所有它们。不涉及无限循环的更好的解决方案是什么?
谢谢。
当前回答
你可以使用下面的代码:
public class MyTask implements Runnable {
private CountDownLatch countDownLatch;
public MyTask(CountDownLatch countDownLatch {
this.countDownLatch = countDownLatch;
}
@Override
public void run() {
try {
//Do somethings
//
this.countDownLatch.countDown();//important
} catch (InterruptedException ex) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
}
}
}
CountDownLatch countDownLatch = new CountDownLatch(NUMBER_OF_TASKS);
ExecutorService taskExecutor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4);
for (int i = 0; i < NUMBER_OF_TASKS; i++){
taskExecutor.execute(new MyTask(countDownLatch));
}
countDownLatch.await();
System.out.println("Finish tasks");
其他回答
我们可以使用流API来处理流。请参阅下面的片段
final List<Runnable> tasks = ...; //or any other functional interface
tasks.stream().parallel().forEach(Runnable::run) // Uses default pool
//alternatively to specify parallelism
new ForkJoinPool(15).submit(
() -> tasks.stream().parallel().forEach(Runnable::run)
).get();
这可能会有所帮助
Log.i(LOG_TAG, "shutting down executor...");
executor.shutdown();
while (true) {
try {
Log.i(LOG_TAG, "Waiting for executor to terminate...");
if (executor.isTerminated())
break;
if (executor.awaitTermination(5000, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)) {
break;
}
} catch (InterruptedException ignored) {}
}
只是在这里提供更多不同于使用闩锁/屏障的选择。 你也可以在它们全部使用完CompletionService之前得到部分结果。
来自Java并发实践: “如果您有一批计算要提交给Executor，并且您希望检索它们的结果 可用时，您可以保留与每个任务关联的Future，并通过调用get来重复轮询完成 超时为0。这是可能的，但很乏味。幸运的是，还有更好的方法:完井服务。”
这里是实现
public class TaskSubmiter {
private final ExecutorService executor;
TaskSubmiter(ExecutorService executor) { this.executor = executor; }
void doSomethingLarge(AnySourceClass source) {
final List<InterestedResult> info = doPartialAsyncProcess(source);
CompletionService<PartialResult> completionService = new ExecutorCompletionService<PartialResult>(executor);
for (final InterestedResult interestedResultItem : info)
completionService.submit(new Callable<PartialResult>() {
public PartialResult call() {
return InterestedResult.doAnOperationToGetPartialResult();
}
});
try {
for (int t = 0, n = info.size(); t < n; t++) {
Future<PartialResult> f = completionService.take();
PartialResult PartialResult = f.get();
processThisSegment(PartialResult);
}
}
catch (InterruptedException e) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
}
catch (ExecutionException e) {
throw somethinghrowable(e.getCause());
}
}
}
你也可以使用期货列表:
List<Future> futures = new ArrayList<Future>();
// now add to it:
futures.add(executorInstance.submit(new Callable<Void>() {
public Void call() throws IOException {
// do something
return null;
}
}));
然后当你想要连接所有线程时，它本质上等同于连接每个线程，(额外的好处是它会从子线程重新引发异常到主线程):
for(Future f: this.futures) { f.get(); }
Basically the trick is to call .get() on each Future one at a time, instead of infinite looping calling isDone() on (all or each). So you're guaranteed to "move on" through and past this block as soon as the last thread finishes. The caveat is that since the .get() call re-raises exceptions, if one of the threads dies, you would raise from this possibly before the other threads have finished to completion [to avoid this, you could add a catch ExecutionException around the get call]. The other caveat is it keeps a reference to all threads so if they have thread local variables they won't get collected till after you get past this block (though you might be able to get around this, if it became a problem, by removing Future's off the ArrayList). If you wanted to know which Future "finishes first" you could use some something like https://stackoverflow.com/a/31885029/32453
ExecutorService.invokeAll()为您完成。
ExecutorService taskExecutor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4);
List<Callable<?>> tasks; // your tasks
// invokeAll() returns when all tasks are complete
List<Future<?>> futures = taskExecutor.invokeAll(tasks);
