意想不到的“=”

这可能是由于在变量名中使用无效字符造成的。变量名称必须遵循以下规则:

变量名与PHP中的其他标签遵循相同的规则。有效变量名以字母或下划线开头，后面跟着任意数量的字母、数字或下划线。作为正则表达式，它可以这样表示:'[a- za - z_ \x7f-\xff][a- za - z0 -9_\x7f-\xff]*'

对于VS Code的新手，如果你看到语法错误，检查你是否保存了文件。如果你有一个错误的语法，保存文件，然后在不保存的情况下修复语法，VS Code会继续显示错误。只有保存文件后，错误信息才会消失。

意外的T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING意外的t_encapsed_and_空白

T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING和T_ENCAPSED_AND_WHITESPACE是指带引号的“字符串”字面量。

它们在不同的上下文中使用，但语法问题非常相似。t_encaged…警告出现在双引号的字符串上下文中，而T_CONSTANT…字符串经常在普通PHP表达式或语句中出错。

Incorrect variable interpolation And it comes up most frequently for incorrect PHP variable interpolation: ⇓ ⇓ echo "Here comes a $wrong['array'] access"; Quoting arrays keys is a must in PHP context. But in double quoted strings (or HEREDOCs) this is a mistake. The parser complains about the contained single quoted 'string', because it usually expects a literal identifier / key there. More precisely it's valid to use PHP2-style simple syntax within double quotes for array references: echo "This is only $valid[here] ..."; Nested arrays or deeper object references however require the complex curly string expression syntax: echo "Use {$array['as_usual']} with curly syntax."; If unsure, this is commonly safer to use. It's often even considered more readable. And better IDEs actually use distinct syntax colorization for that. Missing concatenation If a string follows an expression, but lacks a concatenation or other operator, then you'll see PHP complain about the string literal: ⇓ print "Hello " . WORLD " !"; While it's obvious to you and me, PHP just can't guess that the string was meant to be appended there. Confusing string quote enclosures The same syntax error occurs when confounding string delimiters. A string started by a single ' or double " quote also ends with the same. ⇓ print "<a href="' . $link . '">click here</a>"; ⌞⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⌟⌞⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⌟⌞⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⎽⌟ That example started with double quotes. But double quotes were also destined for the HTML attributes. The intended concatenation operator within however became interpreted as part of a second string in single quotes. Tip: Set your editor/IDE to use slightly distinct colorization for single and double quoted strings. (It also helps with application logic to prefer e.g. double quoted strings for textual output, and single quoted strings only for constant-like values.) This is a good example where you shouldn't break out of double quotes in the first place. Instead just use proper \" escapes for the HTML attributes´ quotes: print "<a href=\"{$link}\">click here</a>"; While this can also lead to syntax confusion, all better IDEs/editors again help by colorizing the escaped quotes differently. Missing opening quote Equivalently are forgotten opening "/' quotes a recipe for parser errors: ⇓ make_url(login', 'open'); Here the ', ' would become a string literal after a bareword, when obviously login was meant to be a string parameter. Array lists If you miss a , comma in an array creation block, the parser will see two consecutive strings: array( ⇓ "key" => "value" "next" => "....", ); Note that the last line may always contain an extra comma, but overlooking one in between is unforgivable. Which is hard to discover without syntax highlighting. Function parameter lists The same thing for function calls: ⇓ myfunc(123, "text", "and" "more") Runaway strings A common variation are quite simply forgotten string terminators: ⇓ mysql_evil("SELECT * FROM stuffs); print "'ok'"; ⇑ Here PHP complains about two string literals directly following each other. But the real cause is the unclosed previous string of course. HEREDOC indentation Prior PHP 7.3, the heredoc string end delimiter can't be prefixed with spaces: print <<< HTML <link..> HTML; ⇑ Solution: upgrade PHP or find a better hoster.

另请参阅

PHP中关联数组的插值(双引号字符串) 语法错误，意外的T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING 语法错误，PHP中意外的T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING SQL查询中出现意外的T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING错误

意想不到的美元结束

当PHP谈到“意外的$end”时，这意味着您的代码在解析器期望更多代码时结束了。(如果从字面上理解，这个信息有点误导。它不是关于一个名为“$end”的变量，就像新来者有时认为的那样。它指的是“文件的结束”，EOF。)

原因:代码块/和函数或类声明的{和}不平衡。

它几乎总是缺少一个}花括号来关闭前面的代码块。它的意思是，解析器希望找到一个结束}，但实际上到达了文件的末尾。

同样，使用适当的缩进来避免此类问题。 使用带有括号匹配的IDE，找出}错误的地方。 在大多数ide和文本编辑器中都有快捷键: NetBeans, PhpStorm, Komodo: Ctrl[和Ctrl] Eclipse, Aptana: CtrlShiftP Atom, Sublime: Ctrlm - Zend Studio Ctrlm Geany, notepad++: CtrlB - Joe: CtrlG - Emacs: C-M-n - Vim: %

大多数ide还突出显示匹配的大括号、方括号和圆括号。 这使得检查它们的相关性变得非常容易:

无端接的表达式

对于未结束的表达式或语句，也会出现意外的$end语法/解析器错误:

$var = func（1， ？>EOF

因此，首先查看脚本的末尾。拖尾;在任何PHP脚本中，最后一条语句通常是多余的。但你应该有一个。正是因为它缩小了这些语法问题的范围。特别是在您发现自己在脚本末尾添加了更多语句之后。

缩进的HEREDOC标记

另一种常见情况出现在HEREDOC或NOWDOC字符串中。如果前面有空格、制表符等，终止标记将被忽略:

print <<< END
    Content...
    Content....
  END;
# ↑ terminator isn't exactly at the line start

因此，解析器假定HEREDOC字符串将一直持续到文件的末尾(因此是“意外的$end”)。几乎所有的ide和语法高亮编辑器都会明确显示或发出警告。

转义的引号

如果你在字符串中使用\，它有一个特殊的含义。这称为“转义字符”，通常告诉解析器按字面意思取下一个字符。

示例:echo 'Jim said \'Hello\ ";将打印Jim说'hello'

如果转义字符串的结束引号，结束引号将被字面上理解，而不是像预期的那样，即作为字符串的一部分而不是结束字符串的可打印引号。这通常会在打开下一个字符串后或脚本结束时显示为解析错误。

在Windows中指定路径时非常常见的错误:“C:\xampp\htdocs\”是错误的。你需要“C:\\xampp\\htdocs\\ \”。另外，PHP通常会转换unix风格的路径(例如。“C:/xampp/htdocs/”)到Windows的正确路径。

替代语法

在模板中使用语句/代码块的替代语法时，很少会看到这种语法错误。使用if:和else:和一个缺失的endif;为例。

参见:

PHP语法错误“意外$end” 解析错误:语法错误，在我的PHP代码文件意外结束 解析错误语法错误文件意外结束，使用PHP PHP解析错误:语法错误，CodeIgniter视图中的文件意外结束 解析错误:语法错误，文件意外结束(注册脚本) “解析错误:语法错误，意外$end”为我的uni注册分配 修复PHP错误:PHP错误#3:文件意外结束

意想不到的T_IF 意想不到的T_FOREACH 意想不到的T_FOR 意想不到的T_WHILE 意想不到的T_DO 意想不到的T_ECHO

控制结构，如if、foreach、for、while、list、global、return、do、print、echo只能作为语句使用。它们通常单独驻留在一行上。

Semicolon; where you at? Pretty universally have you missed a semicolon in the previous line if the parser complains about a control statement: ⇓ $x = myfunc() if (true) { Solution: look into the previous line; add semicolon. Class declarations Another location where this occurs is in class declarations. In the class section you can only list property initializations and method sections. No code may reside there. class xyz { if (true) {} foreach ($var) {} Such syntax errors commonly materialize for incorrectly nested { and }. In particular when function code blocks got closed too early. Statements in expression context Most language constructs can only be used as statements. They aren't meant to be placed inside other expressions: ⇓ $var = array(1, 2, foreach($else as $_), 5, 6); Likewise can't you use an if in strings, math expressions or elsewhere: ⇓ print "Oh, " . if (true) { "you!" } . " won't work"; // Use a ternary condition here instead, when versed enough. For embedding if-like conditions in an expression specifically, you often want to use a ?: ternary evaluation. The same applies to for, while, global, echo and a lesser extend list. ⇓ echo 123, echo 567, "huh?"; Whereas print() is a language built-in that may be used in expression context. (But rarely makes sense.) Reserved keywords as identifiers You also can't use do or if and other language constructs for user-defined functions or class names. (Perhaps in PHP 7. But even then it wouldn't be advisable.) Your have a semi-colon instead of a colon (:) or curly bracket ({) after your control block Control structures are typically wrapped in curly braces (but colons can be used in an alternative syntax) to represent their scope. If you accidentally use a semi-colon you prematurely close that block resulting in your closing statement throwing an error.

    foreach ($errors as $error); <-- should be : or {

意想不到的T_IF 意想不到的T_ELSEIF 意想不到的T_ELSE 意想不到的T_ENDIF

条件控件块if、elseif和else遵循一个简单的结构。当你遇到语法错误时，很可能只是无效的块嵌套→缺少{花括号}——或者多了一个。

Missing { or } due to incorrect indentation Mismatched code braces are common to less well-formatted code such as: if((!($opt["uniQartz5.8"]!=$this->check58)) or (empty($_POST['poree']))) {if ($true) {echo"halp";} elseif((!$z)or%b){excSmthng(False,5.8)}elseif (False){ If your code looks like this, start afresh! Otherwise it's unfixable to you or anyone else. There's no point in showcasing this on the internet to inquire for help. You will only be able to fix it, if you can visually follow the nested structure and relation of if/else conditionals and their { code blocks }. Use your IDE to see if they're all paired. if (true) { if (false) { … } elseif ($whatever) { if ($something2) { … } else { … } } else { … } if (false) { // a second `if` tree … } else { … } } elseif (false) { … } Any double } } will not just close a branch, but a previous condition structure. Therefore stick with one coding style; don't mix and match in nested if/else trees. Apart from consistency here, it turns out helpful to avoid lengthy conditions too. Use temporary variables or functions to avoid unreadable if-expressions. IF cannot be used in expressions A surprisingly frequent newcomer mistake is trying to use an if statement in an expression, such as a print statement: ⇓ echo "<a href='" . if ($link == "example.org") { echo … Which is invalid of course. You can use a ternary conditional, but beware of readability impacts. echo "<a href='" . ($link ? "http://yes" : "http://no") . "</a>"; Otherwise break such output constructs up: use multiple ifs and echos. Better yet, use temporary variables, and place your conditionals before: if ($link) { $href = "yes"; } else { $href = "no"; } echo "<a href='$href'>Link</a>"; Defining functions or methods for such cases often makes sense too. Control blocks don't return "results" Now this is less common, but a few coders even try to treat if as if it could return a result: $var = if ($x == $y) { "true" }; Which is structurally identical to using if within a string concatenation / expression. But control structures (if / foreach / while) don't have a "result". The literal string "true" would also just be a void statement. You'll have to use an assignment in the code block: if ($x == $y) { $var = "true"; } Alternatively, resort to a ?: ternary comparison. If in If You cannot nest an if within a condition either: ⇓ if ($x == true and (if $y != false)) { ... } Which is obviously redundant, because the and (or or) already allows chaining comparisons. Forgotten ; semicolons Once more: Each control block needs to be a statement. If the previous code piece isn't terminated by a semicolon, then that's a guaranteed syntax error: ⇓ $var = 1 + 2 + 3 if (true) { … } Btw, the last line in a {…} code block needs a semicolon too. Semicolon too early Now it's probably wrong to blame a particular coding style, as this pitfall is too easy to overlook: ⇓ if ($x == 5); { $y = 7; } else ← { $x = -1; } Which happens more often than you might imagine. When you terminate the if () expression with ; it will execute a void statement. The ; becomes a an empty {} of its own! The {…} block thus is detached from the if, and would always run. So the else no longer had a relation to an open if construct, which is why this would lead to an Unexpected T_ELSE syntax error. Which also explains a likewise subtle variation of this syntax error: if ($x) { x_is_true(); }; else { something_else(); }; Where the ; after the code block {…} terminates the whole if construct, severing the else branch syntactically. Not using code blocks It's syntactically allowed to omit curly braces {…} for code blocks in if/elseif/else branches. Which sadly is a syntax style very common to unversed coders. (Under the false assumption this was quicker to type or read). However that's highly likely to trip up the syntax. Sooner or later additional statements will find their way into the if/else branches: if (true) $x = 5; elseif (false) $x = 6; $y = 7; ← else $z = 0; But to actually use code blocks, you do have to write {…} them as such! Even seasoned programmers avoid this braceless syntax, or at least understand it as an exceptional exception to the rule. Else / Elseif in wrong order One thing to remind yourself is the conditional order, of course. if ($a) { … } else { … } elseif ($b) { … } ↑ You can have as many elseifs as you want, but else has to go last. That's just how it is. Class declarations As mentioned above, you can't have control statements in a class declaration: class xyz { if (true) { function ($var) {} } You either forgot a function definition, or closed one } too early in such cases. Unexpected T_ELSEIF / T_ELSE When mixing PHP and HTML, the closing } for an if/elseif must be in the same PHP block <?php ?> as the next elseif/else. This will generate an error as the closing } for the if needs to be part of the elseif: <?php if ($x) { ?> html <?php } ?> <?php elseif ($y) { ?> html <?php } ?> The correct form <?php } elseif: <?php if ($x) { ?> html <?php } elseif ($y) { ?> html <?php } ?> This is more or less a variation of incorrect indentation - presumably often based on wrong coding intentions. You cannot mash other statements inbetween if and elseif/else structural tokens: if (true) { } echo "in between"; ← elseif (false) { } ?> text <?php ← else { } Either can only occur in {…} code blocks, not in between control structure tokens. This wouldn't make sense anyway. It's not like that there was some "undefined" state when PHP jumps between if and else branches. You'll have to make up your mind where print statements belong to / or if they need to be repeated in both branches. Nor can you part an if/else between different control structures: foreach ($array as $i) { if ($i) { … } } else { … } There is no syntactic relation between the if and else. The foreach lexical scope ends at }, so there's no point for the if structure to continue. T_ENDIF If an unexpected T_ENDIF is complained about, you're using the alternative syntax style if: ⋯ elseif: ⋯ else: ⋯ endif;. Which you should really think twice about. A common pitfall is confusing the eerily similar : colon for a ; semicolon. (Covered in "Semicolon too early") As indentation is harder to track in template files, the more when using the alternative syntax - it's plausible your endif; does not match any if:. Using } endif; is a doubled if-terminator. While an "unexpected $end" is usually the price for a forgotten closing } curly brace. Assignment vs. comparison So, this is not a syntax error, but worth mentioning in this context: ⇓ if ($x = true) { } else { do_false(); } That's not a ==/=== comparison, but an = assignment. This is rather subtle, and will easily lead some users to helplessly edit whole condition blocks. Watch out for unintended assignments first - whenver you experience a logic fault / misbeheviour.