这里的解决方案仅用于访问深度嵌套的键。我需要一个来访问、添加、修改和删除密钥。这是我想到的:

var deepAccessObject = function(object, path_to_key, type_of_function, value){
    switch(type_of_function){
        //Add key/modify key
        case 0: 
            if(path_to_key.length === 1){
                if(value)
                    object[path_to_key[0]] = value;
                return object[path_to_key[0]];
            }else{
                if(object[path_to_key[0]])
                    return deepAccessObject(object[path_to_key[0]], path_to_key.slice(1), type_of_function, value);
                else
                    object[path_to_key[0]] = {};
            }
            break;
        //delete key
        case 1:
            if(path_to_key.length === 1){
                delete object[path_to_key[0]];
                return true;
            }else{
                if(object[path_to_key[0]])
                    return deepAccessObject(object[path_to_key[0]], path_to_key.slice(1), type_of_function, value);
                else
                    return false;
            }
            break;
        default:
            console.log("Wrong type of function");
    }
};

Path_to_key:数组中的路径。你可以用你的string_path.split(".")替换它。 Type_of_function: 0用于访问(不传递任何值给值)，0用于添加和修改。1表示删除。

在这里我提供了更多的方法，这些方法在很多方面看起来都更快:

选项1:Split string on。Or [Or] Or ' Or "，颠倒过来，跳过空项。

function getValue(path, origin) {
    if (origin === void 0 || origin === null) origin = self ? self : this;
    if (typeof path !== 'string') path = '' + path;
    var parts = path.split(/\[|\]|\.|'|"/g).reverse(), name; // (why reverse? because it's usually faster to pop off the end of an array)
    while (parts.length) { name=parts.pop(); if (name) origin=origin[name]; }
    return origin;
}

选项2(最快的，除了eval):低级字符扫描(没有regex/split/等等，只是一个快速字符扫描)。 注意:该命令不支持索引引用。

function getValue(path, origin) {
    if (origin === void 0 || origin === null) origin = self ? self : this;
    if (typeof path !== 'string') path = '' + path;
    var c = '', pc, i = 0, n = path.length, name = '';
    if (n) while (i<=n) ((c = path[i++]) == '.' || c == '[' || c == ']' || c == void 0) ? (name?(origin = origin[name], name = ''):(pc=='.'||pc=='['||pc==']'&&c==']'?i=n+2:void 0),pc=c) : name += c;
    if (i==n+2) throw "Invalid path: "+path;
    return origin;
} // (around 1,000,000+/- ops/sec)

选项3:(新:选项2扩展到支持引号-有点慢，但仍然很快)

function getValue(path, origin) {
    if (origin === void 0 || origin === null) origin = self ? self : this;
    if (typeof path !== 'string') path = '' + path;
    var c, pc, i = 0, n = path.length, name = '', q;
    while (i<=n)
        ((c = path[i++]) == '.' || c == '[' || c == ']' || c == "'" || c == '"' || c == void 0) ? (c==q&&path[i]==']'?q='':q?name+=c:name?(origin?origin=origin[name]:i=n+2,name='') : (pc=='['&&(c=='"'||c=="'")?q=c:pc=='.'||pc=='['||pc==']'&&c==']'||pc=='"'||pc=="'"?i=n+2:void 0), pc=c) : name += c;
    if (i==n+2 || name) throw "Invalid path: "+path;
    return origin;
}

JSPerf： http://jsperf.com/ways-to-dereference-a-delimited-property-string/3

"eval(...)" is still king though (performance wise that is). If you have property paths directly under your control, there shouldn't be any issues with using 'eval' (especially if speed is desired). If pulling property paths "over the wire" (on the line!? lol :P), then yes, use something else to be safe. Only an idiot would say to never use "eval" at all, as there ARE good reasons when to use it. Also, "It is used in Doug Crockford's JSON parser." If the input is safe, then no problems at all. Use the right tool for the right job, that's it.

如果您想要一个能够正确检测和报告路径解析的任何问题的详细信息的解决方案，我为此编写了自己的解决方案——库路径-值。

const {resolveValue} = require('path-value');

resolveValue(someObject, 'part1.name'); //=> Part 1
resolveValue(someObject, 'part2.qty'); //=> 50
resolveValue(someObject, 'part3.0.name'); //=> Part 3A

请注意，对于索引，我们使用.0，而不是[0]，因为解析后者会增加性能损失，而.0直接在JavaScript中工作，因此非常快。

然而，完整的ES5 JavaScript语法也被支持，它只需要首先被标记化:

const {resolveValue, tokenizePath} = require('path-value');

const path = tokenizePath('part3[0].name'); //=> ['part3', '0', 'name']

resolveValue(someObject, path); //=> Part 3A

虽然reduce很好，但我很惊讶没有人使用forEach:

function valueForKeyPath(obj, path){
        const keys = path.split('.');
        keys.forEach((key)=> obj = obj[key]);
        return obj;
    };

Test

我认为你的要求是:

var part1name = someObject.part1.name;
var part2quantity = someObject.part2.qty;
var part3name1 =  someObject.part3[0].name;

你可以这样问:

var part1name = someObject["part1"]["name"];
var part2quantity = someObject["part2"]["qty"];
var part3name1 =  someObject["part3"][0]["name"];

这两种方法都可行

也许这是你自找的

var partName = "part1";
var nameStr = "name";

var part1name = someObject[partName][nameStr];

终于轮到你自找麻烦了

var partName = "part1.name";

var partBits = partName.split(".");

var part1name = someObject[partBits[0]][partBits[1]];

简单的函数，允许字符串或数组路径。

function get(obj, path) {
  if(typeof path === 'string') path = path.split('.');

  if(path.length === 0) return obj;
  return get(obj[path[0]], path.slice(1));
}

const obj = {a: {b: {c: 'foo'}}};

console.log(get(obj, 'a.b.c')); //foo

OR

console.log(get(obj, ['a', 'b', 'c'])); //foo