使用ide的一个很好的理由是，它们是生产现代软件的公认方式。如果您不使用，那么您可能会使用“老式”的东西，如vi和emacs。这可能会导致人们得出结论——可能是错误的——你被困在自己的方式中，无法适应新的工作方式。在软件开发这样的行业——创意可能在短短几个月内就会过时——这是一种危险的状态。这可能会严重损害你未来的工作前景。

IDE可以让人更快更容易地工作……我注意到我花了很多时间在一个简单的文本编辑器中浏览代码……

在一个好的IDE中，如果IDE支持跳转到函数，跳转到之前的编辑位置，跳转到变量……此外，一个好的IDE可以减少试验不同语言特性和项目的时间，因为启动时间可以很短。

I'm not sure there's a clear dividing line between a text editor and an IDE. You have the likes of Notepad at one end of the scale, and the best modern IDEs at the other, but there are a lot of thing in between. Most text editors have syntax highlighting; editors aimed at programmers often have various other features such as easy code navigation and auto complete. Emacs even lets you integrate a debugger. The IDEs of even ten years ago had far less features to help programmers than you'd expect of a serious text editor these days.

我更喜欢IDE，因为它允许我集成编辑/编译/调试，只需单击一下从错误跳转到生成错误的行。此外，它允许使用操作系统标准接口显示多个信息窗格。简而言之，它为用户提供了一个基于鼠标的输入界面和一个现代的输出界面，而不是依靠上世纪70年代的技术和界面来帮助我。

IDE还有更复杂的用户和用途，我并没有说我使用过他们或了解他们所有人。当我需要的时候，我会学习它们。

It's really VERY simple. But this answer is a bit of a paradox in that I am discussing something only EMBEDDED level developers ever encounter. The reason this is an odd view is that frankly when I was doing embedded work (the brief time I was making any real money) an IDE would be down right STRANGE and most of your coworkers would wonder why you can't remember enough about SNMP/ASN.1 or whatever protocol you were dealing with to just /do your job/. BUT you can NOT, as far as I know, do a graphical simulation of what your microcontroller is doing in something like /real time/ without an "IDE".

拥有IDE有以下优势:

编译通常是“动态的”，这意味着不再切换到命令行进行编译 调试是集成的，在IDE中拥有调试意味着步进调试器实际上使用就地编辑器来直观地显示执行了哪些代码 IDE通常对您正在使用的语言具有更多的语义知识，并且可以在输入时向您显示可能出现的问题。重构比“搜索替换”强大得多。

还有很多，也许你应该试试。