You could conceivably set up a git hook that when say a commit is made to say the "stable" branch it will pull the changes and apply them to the PHP site. The big downside is you won't have much control if something goes wrong and it will add time to your testing - but you can get an idea of how much work will be involved when you merge say your trunk branch into the stable branch to know how many conflicts you may run into. It will be important to keep an eye on any files that are site specific (eg. configuration files) unless you solely intend to only run the one site.

或者，你有没有考虑过把改变推到网站上?

有关git钩子的信息，请参阅githooks文档。

我对基督徒解决方案的看法。

git archive --prefix=deploy/  master | tar -x -C $TMPDIR | rsync $TMPDIR/deploy/ --copy-links -av username@server.com:/home/user/my_app && rm -rf $TMPDIR/deploy

存档主分支到tar 解压tar档案到系统临时文件夹的部署目录。 Rsync更改到服务器 从临时文件夹中删除部署目录。

更新:我现在使用Lloyd Moore解决方案与密钥代理ssh -A ....推入一个主回购，然后从所有机器上并行地从主回购中提取，这稍微快一些，在这些机器上需要的设置也更少。

这里没有解。如果服务器上安装了git，只需通过SSH推送即可。

在本地的.git/配置中需要以下条目

[remote "amazon"]
    url = amazon:/path/to/project.git
    fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/amazon/*

但是嘿，亚马逊是怎么回事?在你的本地~/。Ssh /config你需要添加以下条目:

Host amazon
    Hostname <YOUR_IP>
    User <USER>
    IdentityFile ~/.ssh/amazon-private-key

现在你可以打电话

git push amazon master
ssh <USER>@<YOUR_IP> 'cd /path/to/project && git pull'

(顺便说一句:/ /项目/路径。Git与实际的工作目录/路径/到/项目不同)

听起来你应该在你的服务器上有两个副本。一个裸拷贝，你可以推/拉，当你完成时，你会推你的改变，然后你会把这个克隆到你的web目录，并设置一个cronjob来每天从你的web目录更新git pull。

我的方法是在我的部署服务器上有一个裸露的Git存储库，我在那里推送更改。然后我登录到部署服务器，更改到实际的web服务器文档目录，并执行git拉取。我没有使用任何钩子来自动地做这个，这似乎比它的价值更麻烦。

git配置——local receive.denyCurrentBranch updateInstead

在Git 2.3中添加了一个很好的可能性:https://github.com/git/git/blob/v2.3.0/Documentation/config.txt#L2155

您在服务器存储库上设置它，如果工作树是干净的，它也会更新工作树。

在2.4中有进一步的改进，包括push-to-checkout钩子和未出生分支的处理。

示例用法:

git init server
cd server
touch a
git add .
git commit -m 0
git config --local receive.denyCurrentBranch updateInstead

cd ..
git clone server local
cd local
touch b
git add .
git commit -m 1
git push origin master:master

cd ../server
ls

输出:

a
b

这确实有以下GitHub公告中提到的缺点:

Your server will contain a .git directory containing the entire history of your project. You probably want to make extra sure that it cannot be served to users! During deploys, it will be possible for users momentarily to encounter the site in an inconsistent state, with some files at the old version and others at the new version, or even half-written files. If this is a problem for your project, push-to-deploy is probably not for you. If your project needs a "build" step, then you will have to set that up explicitly, perhaps via githooks.

但是所有这些点都超出了Git的范围，必须由外部代码来处理。因此，从这个意义上说，这和Git钩子一起是最终的解决方案。