对于post-receive hook，我使用了两种解决方案:

部署方案1

#!/bin/bash 
#  /git-repo/hooks/post-receive - file content on server (chmod as 755 to be executed)
# DEPLOY SOLUTION 1 

    export GIT_DIR=/git/repo-bare.git
    export GIT_BRANCH1=master
    export GIT_TARGET1=/var/www/html
    export GIT_BRANCH2=dev
    export GIT_TARGET2=/var/www/dev
    echo "GIT DIR:  $GIT_DIR/"
    echo "GIT TARGET1:  $GIT_TARGET1/"
    echo "GIT BRANCH1:  $GIT_BRANCH1/"
    echo "GIT TARGET2:  $GIT_TARGET2/"
    echo "GIT BRANCH2:  $GIT_BRANCH2/"
    echo ""

    cd $GIT_DIR/

while read oldrev newrev refname
do
    branch=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref $refname)
    BRANCH_REGEX='^${GIT_BRANCH1}.*$'
    if [[ $branch =~ $BRANCH_REGEX ]] ; then
        export GIT_WORK_TREE=$GIT_TARGET1/.
        echo "Checking out branch: $branch";
        echo "Checking out to workdir: $GIT_WORK_TREE"; 

        git checkout -f $branch
    fi

    BRANCH_REGEX='^${GIT_BRANCH2}.*$'
    if [[ $branch =~ $BRANCH_REGEX ]] ; then
        export GIT_WORK_TREE=$GIT_TARGET2/.
        echo "Checking out branch: $branch";
        echo "Checking out to workdir: $GIT_WORK_TREE"; 

        git checkout -f $branch
    fi
done

部署方案2

#!/bin/bash 
#  /git-repo/hooks/post-receive - file content on server (chmod as 755 to be executed)
# DEPLOY SOLUTION 2

    export GIT_DIR=/git/repo-bare.git
    export GIT_BRANCH1=master
    export GIT_TARGET1=/var/www/html
    export GIT_BRANCH2=dev
    export GIT_TARGET2=/var/www/dev
    export GIT_TEMP_DIR1=/tmp/deploy1
    export GIT_TEMP_DIR2=/tmp/deploy2
    echo "GIT DIR:  $GIT_DIR/"
    echo "GIT TARGET1:  $GIT_TARGET1/"
    echo "GIT BRANCH1:  $GIT_BRANCH1/"
    echo "GIT TARGET2:  $GIT_TARGET2/"
    echo "GIT BRANCH2:  $GIT_BRANCH2/"
    echo "GIT TEMP DIR1:  $GIT_TEMP_DIR1/"
    echo "GIT TEMP DIR2:  $GIT_TEMP_DIR2/"
    echo ""

    cd $GIT_DIR/

while read oldrev newrev refname
do
    branch=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref $refname)
    BRANCH_REGEX='^${GIT_BRANCH1}.*$'
    if [[ $branch =~ $BRANCH_REGEX ]] ; then
        export GIT_WORK_TREE=$GIT_TARGET1/.
        echo "Checking out branch: $branch";
        echo "Checking out to workdir: $GIT_WORK_TREE"; 

        # DEPLOY SOLUTION 2: 
        cd $GIT_DIR/; mkdir -p $GIT_TEMP_DIR1; 
        export GIT_WORK_TREE=$GIT_TEMP_DIR1/.
        git checkout -f $branch
        export GIT_WORK_TREE=$GIT_TARGET1/.
        rsync $GIT_TEMP_DIR1/. -v -q --delete --delete-after -av $GIT_TARGET1/.
        rm -rf $GIT_TEMP_DIR1
    fi

    BRANCH_REGEX='^${GIT_BRANCH2}.*$'
    if [[ $branch =~ $BRANCH_REGEX ]] ; then
        export GIT_WORK_TREE=$GIT_TARGET2/.
        echo "Checking out branch: $branch";
        echo "Checking out to workdir: $GIT_WORK_TREE"; 

        # DEPLOY SOLUTION 2: 
        cd $GIT_DIR/; mkdir -p $GIT_TEMP_DIR2; 
        export GIT_WORK_TREE=$GIT_TEMP_DIR2/.
        git checkout -f $branch
        export GIT_WORK_TREE=$GIT_TARGET2/.
        rsync $GIT_TEMP_DIR2/. -v -q --delete --delete-after -av $GIT_TARGET2/.
        rm -rf $GIT_TEMP_DIR2
    fi
done

这两种解决方案都基于本文中提供的早期解决方案。

请注意, 美元BRANCH_REGEX = ' ^ $ {GIT_BRANCH1}。” 过滤匹配“master”或“dev*”字符串的分支名称，如果推送的分支匹配，则部署工作树。 这使得将开发版本和主版本部署到不同的位置成为可能。

DEPLOY SOLUTION 1仅删除文件，这些文件是repo的一部分，并由提交删除。比部署方案2快。

DEPLOY SOLUTION 2的优势在于，它将从生产目录中删除添加到服务器端的任何新文件，无论这些文件是否添加到repo。它将永远是回购的干净的欺骗。比部署方案1慢。

我们使用capistrano来管理部署。 我们构建capistrano以部署在登台服务器上，然后与我们所有的服务器运行rsync。

cap deploy
cap deploy:start_rsync (when the staging is ok)

使用capistrano，我们可以在出现bug时轻松回滚

cap deploy:rollback
cap deploy:start_rsync

不要在服务器上安装git或复制。git文件夹。要从git克隆版本更新服务器，您可以使用以下命令:

git ls-files -z | rsync --files-from - --copy-links -av0 . user@server.com:/var/www/project

您可能必须删除从项目中删除的文件。

这将复制所有签入文件。Rsync使用的是安装在服务器上的SSH。

你在服务器上安装的软件越少，他就越安全，管理它的配置和记录它就越容易。也不需要在服务器上保留一个完整的git克隆。这只会使正确地保护所有内容变得更加复杂。

git配置——local receive.denyCurrentBranch updateInstead

在Git 2.3中添加了一个很好的可能性:https://github.com/git/git/blob/v2.3.0/Documentation/config.txt#L2155

您在服务器存储库上设置它，如果工作树是干净的，它也会更新工作树。

在2.4中有进一步的改进，包括push-to-checkout钩子和未出生分支的处理。

示例用法:

git init server
cd server
touch a
git add .
git commit -m 0
git config --local receive.denyCurrentBranch updateInstead

cd ..
git clone server local
cd local
touch b
git add .
git commit -m 1
git push origin master:master

cd ../server
ls

输出:

a
b

这确实有以下GitHub公告中提到的缺点:

Your server will contain a .git directory containing the entire history of your project. You probably want to make extra sure that it cannot be served to users! During deploys, it will be possible for users momentarily to encounter the site in an inconsistent state, with some files at the old version and others at the new version, or even half-written files. If this is a problem for your project, push-to-deploy is probably not for you. If your project needs a "build" step, then you will have to set that up explicitly, perhaps via githooks.

但是所有这些点都超出了Git的范围，必须由外部代码来处理。因此，从这个意义上说，这和Git钩子一起是最终的解决方案。

部署场景

在我们的场景中，我们将代码存储在github/bitbucket上，并希望将其部署到活动服务器上。 在这种情况下，以下组合对我们来说是有效的(这是这里高度好评的答案的混合):

复制你的。git目录到你的web服务器 在本地复制git远程添加live ssh://user@host:port/文件夹 在远程:git配置receive.denyCurrentBranch忽略 在远程:nano .git/hooks/post-receive并添加以下内容: #！/bin/sh GIT_WORK_TREE=/var/www/vhosts/example.org 远程:chmod +x .git/hooks/post-receive 现在你可以用git push live来推送

笔记

此解决方案适用于较旧的git版本(使用1.7和1.9进行测试) 你需要确保先推送到github/bitbucket，这样你就会有一个一致的实时回购 如果你的。git文件夹在根目录中，请确保通过添加.htaccess (source)来隐藏它: RedirectMatch 404 /\..*$

You could conceivably set up a git hook that when say a commit is made to say the "stable" branch it will pull the changes and apply them to the PHP site. The big downside is you won't have much control if something goes wrong and it will add time to your testing - but you can get an idea of how much work will be involved when you merge say your trunk branch into the stable branch to know how many conflicts you may run into. It will be important to keep an eye on any files that are site specific (eg. configuration files) unless you solely intend to only run the one site.

或者，你有没有考虑过把改变推到网站上?

有关git钩子的信息，请参阅githooks文档。