例子:
absolute="/foo/bar"
current="/foo/baz/foo"
# Magic
relative="../../bar"
我如何创造魔法(希望不是太复杂的代码…)?
当前回答
该脚本仅对绝对路径或没有绝对路径的相对路径的输入提供正确的结果。或者. .:
#!/bin/bash
# usage: relpath from to
if [[ "$1" == "$2" ]]
then
echo "."
exit
fi
IFS="/"
current=($1)
absolute=($2)
abssize=${#absolute[@]}
cursize=${#current[@]}
while [[ ${absolute[level]} == ${current[level]} ]]
do
(( level++ ))
if (( level > abssize || level > cursize ))
then
break
fi
done
for ((i = level; i < cursize; i++))
do
if ((i > level))
then
newpath=$newpath"/"
fi
newpath=$newpath".."
done
for ((i = level; i < abssize; i++))
do
if [[ -n $newpath ]]
then
newpath=$newpath"/"
fi
newpath=$newpath${absolute[i]}
done
echo "$newpath"
其他回答
另一个解决方案，纯bash + GNU readlink，在以下上下文中易于使用:
ln -s "$(relpath "$A" "$B")" "$B"
编辑:确保“$B”是不存在或没有软链接在这种情况下，否则relpath遵循这个链接，这不是你想要的!
这几乎适用于当前所有的Linux。如果readlink -m在您这边不起作用，请尝试readlink -f。请参见https://gist.github.com/hilbix/1ec361d00a8178ae8ea0查看可能的更新:
: relpath A B
# Calculate relative path from A to B, returns true on success
# Example: ln -s "$(relpath "$A" "$B")" "$B"
relpath()
{
local X Y A
# We can create dangling softlinks
X="$(readlink -m -- "$1")" || return
Y="$(readlink -m -- "$2")" || return
X="${X%/}/"
A=""
while Y="${Y%/*}"
[ ".${X#"$Y"/}" = ".$X" ]
do
A="../$A"
done
X="$A${X#"$Y"/}"
X="${X%/}"
echo "${X:-.}"
}
注:
Care was taken that it is safe against unwanted shell meta character expansion, in case filenames contain * or ?. The output is meant to be usable as the first argument to ln -s: relpath / / gives . and not the empty string relpath a a gives a, even if a happens to be a directory Most common cases were tested to give reasonable results, too. This solution uses string prefix matching, hence readlink is required to canonicalize paths. Thanks to readlink -m it works for not yet existing paths, too.
在旧系统上，readlink -m不可用，如果文件不存在，readlink -f将失败。所以你可能需要一些像这样的解决方法(未经测试!):
readlink_missing()
{
readlink -m -- "$1" && return
readlink -f -- "$1" && return
[ -e . ] && echo "$(readlink_missing "$(dirname "$1")")/$(basename "$1")"
}
这在$1包含的情况下是不正确的。或. .对于不存在的路径(如/doesnotexist/./a)，但它应该涵盖大多数情况。
(用readlink_missing替换上面的readlink -m——)
编辑，因为下面是反对票
下面是一个测试，这个函数确实是正确的:
check()
{
res="$(relpath "$2" "$1")"
[ ".$res" = ".$3" ] && return
printf ':WRONG: %-10q %-10q gives %q\nCORRECT %-10q %-10q gives %q\n' "$1" "$2" "$res" "$@"
}
# TARGET SOURCE RESULT
check "/A/B/C" "/A" ".."
check "/A/B/C" "/A.x" "../../A.x"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B" "."
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/C" "C"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/C/D" "C/D"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/C/D/E" "C/D/E"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/D" "D"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/D/E" "D/E"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/D" "../D"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/D/E" "../D/E"
check "/A/B/C" "/D/E/F" "../../D/E/F"
check "/foo/baz/moo" "/foo/bar" "../bar"
困惑吗?好吧，这是正确的结果!即使你认为它不符合问题，以下是正确的证明:
check "http://example.com/foo/baz/moo" "http://example.com/foo/bar" "../bar"
毫无疑问，……/bar是从页面moo中看到的页面栏的准确且唯一正确的相对路径。其他一切都是完全错误的。
采用问题的输出很简单，显然假设current是一个目录:
absolute="/foo/bar"
current="/foo/baz/foo"
relative="../$(relpath "$absolute" "$current")"
这将返回所请求的内容。
在你感到惊讶之前，这里有一个稍微复杂一点的relpath变体(注意细微的区别)，它也应该适用于url语法(因此，由于一些bash魔法，末尾/幸存下来):
# Calculate relative PATH to the given DEST from the given BASE
# In the URL case, both URLs must be absolute and have the same Scheme.
# The `SCHEME:` must not be present in the FS either.
# This way this routine works for file paths an
: relpathurl DEST BASE
relpathurl()
{
local X Y A
# We can create dangling softlinks
X="$(readlink -m -- "$1")" || return
Y="$(readlink -m -- "$2")" || return
X="${X%/}/${1#"${1%/}"}"
Y="${Y%/}${2#"${2%/}"}"
A=""
while Y="${Y%/*}"
[ ".${X#"$Y"/}" = ".$X" ]
do
A="../$A"
done
X="$A${X#"$Y"/}"
X="${X%/}"
echo "${X:-.}"
}
这里有一些检查，只是为了弄清楚:它确实像所说的那样工作。
check()
{
res="$(relpathurl "$2" "$1")"
[ ".$res" = ".$3" ] && return
printf ':WRONG: %-10q %-10q gives %q\nCORRECT %-10q %-10q gives %q\n' "$1" "$2" "$res" "$@"
}
# TARGET SOURCE RESULT
check "/A/B/C" "/A" ".."
check "/A/B/C" "/A.x" "../../A.x"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B" "."
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/C" "C"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/C/D" "C/D"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/C/D/E" "C/D/E"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/D" "D"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/B/D/E" "D/E"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/D" "../D"
check "/A/B/C" "/A/D/E" "../D/E"
check "/A/B/C" "/D/E/F" "../../D/E/F"
check "/foo/baz/moo" "/foo/bar" "../bar"
check "http://example.com/foo/baz/moo" "http://example.com/foo/bar" "../bar"
check "http://example.com/foo/baz/moo/" "http://example.com/foo/bar" "../../bar"
check "http://example.com/foo/baz/moo" "http://example.com/foo/bar/" "../bar/"
check "http://example.com/foo/baz/moo/" "http://example.com/foo/bar/" "../../bar/"
下面是如何用它从问题中得到想要的结果:
absolute="/foo/bar"
current="/foo/baz/foo"
relative="$(relpathurl "$absolute" "$current/")"
echo "$relative"
如果你发现什么东西不起作用，请在下面的评论中告诉我。谢谢。
PS:
为什么relpath的论点与这里的所有其他答案相反?
如果你改变
Y="$(readlink -m -- "$2")" || return
to
Y="$(readlink -m -- "${2:-"$PWD"}")" || return
然后你可以去掉第二个参数，这样BASE就是当前目录/URL/任何东西。这只是Unix的原则。
这个脚本只对路径名有效。它不需要任何文件存在。如果传递的路径不是绝对的，那么行为就有点不寻常，但是如果两条路径都是相对的，那么应该能正常工作。
我只在OS X上测试过，所以可能不太便携。
#!/bin/bash
set -e
declare SCRIPT_NAME="$(basename $0)"
function usage {
echo "Usage: $SCRIPT_NAME <base path> <target file>"
echo " Outputs <target file> relative to <base path>"
exit 1
}
if [ $# -lt 2 ]; then usage; fi
declare base=$1
declare target=$2
declare -a base_part=()
declare -a target_part=()
#Split path elements & canonicalize
OFS="$IFS"; IFS='/'
bpl=0;
for bp in $base; do
case "$bp" in
".");;
"..") let "bpl=$bpl-1" ;;
*) base_part[${bpl}]="$bp" ; let "bpl=$bpl+1";;
esac
done
tpl=0;
for tp in $target; do
case "$tp" in
".");;
"..") let "tpl=$tpl-1" ;;
*) target_part[${tpl}]="$tp" ; let "tpl=$tpl+1";;
esac
done
IFS="$OFS"
#Count common prefix
common=0
for (( i=0 ; i<$bpl ; i++ )); do
if [ "${base_part[$i]}" = "${target_part[$common]}" ] ; then
let "common=$common+1"
else
break
fi
done
#Compute number of directories up
let "updir=$bpl-$common" || updir=0 #if the expression is zero, 'let' fails
#trivial case (after canonical decomposition)
if [ $updir -eq 0 ]; then
echo .
exit
fi
#Print updirs
for (( i=0 ; i<$updir ; i++ )); do
echo -n ../
done
#Print remaining path
for (( i=$common ; i<$tpl ; i++ )); do
if [ $i -ne $common ]; then
echo -n "/"
fi
if [ "" != "${target_part[$i]}" ] ; then
echo -n "${target_part[$i]}"
fi
done
#One last newline
echo
该脚本仅对绝对路径或没有绝对路径的相对路径的输入提供正确的结果。或者. .:
#!/bin/bash
# usage: relpath from to
if [[ "$1" == "$2" ]]
then
echo "."
exit
fi
IFS="/"
current=($1)
absolute=($2)
abssize=${#absolute[@]}
cursize=${#current[@]}
while [[ ${absolute[level]} == ${current[level]} ]]
do
(( level++ ))
if (( level > abssize || level > cursize ))
then
break
fi
done
for ((i = level; i < cursize; i++))
do
if ((i > level))
then
newpath=$newpath"/"
fi
newpath=$newpath".."
done
for ((i = level; i < abssize; i++))
do
if [[ -n $newpath ]]
then
newpath=$newpath"/"
fi
newpath=$newpath${absolute[i]}
done
echo "$newpath"
我把你的问题作为一个挑战，用“可移植的”shell代码来编写它，即。
考虑到POSIX外壳 没有数组之类的bashisms 避免像打瘟疫一样打外部电话。脚本中没有一个分叉!这使得它非常快，特别是在有显著分叉开销的系统上，比如cygwin。 必须处理路径名中的glob字符(*，?，[，])
它运行在任何POSIX兼容shell (zsh, bash, ksh, ash, busybox，…)上。它甚至包含一个测试套件来验证其操作。路径名的规范化留作练习。: -)
#!/bin/sh
# Find common parent directory path for a pair of paths.
# Call with two pathnames as args, e.g.
# commondirpart foo/bar foo/baz/bat -> result="foo/"
# The result is either empty or ends with "/".
commondirpart () {
result=""
while test ${#1} -gt 0 -a ${#2} -gt 0; do
if test "${1%${1#?}}" != "${2%${2#?}}"; then # First characters the same?
break # No, we're done comparing.
fi
result="$result${1%${1#?}}" # Yes, append to result.
set -- "${1#?}" "${2#?}" # Chop first char off both strings.
done
case "$result" in
(""|*/) ;;
(*) result="${result%/*}/";;
esac
}
# Turn foo/bar/baz into ../../..
#
dir2dotdot () {
OLDIFS="$IFS" IFS="/" result=""
for dir in $1; do
result="$result../"
done
result="${result%/}"
IFS="$OLDIFS"
}
# Call with FROM TO args.
relativepath () {
case "$1" in
(*//*|*/./*|*/../*|*?/|*/.|*/..)
printf '%s\n' "'$1' not canonical"; exit 1;;
(/*)
from="${1#?}";;
(*)
printf '%s\n' "'$1' not absolute"; exit 1;;
esac
case "$2" in
(*//*|*/./*|*/../*|*?/|*/.|*/..)
printf '%s\n' "'$2' not canonical"; exit 1;;
(/*)
to="${2#?}";;
(*)
printf '%s\n' "'$2' not absolute"; exit 1;;
esac
case "$to" in
("$from") # Identical directories.
result=".";;
("$from"/*) # From /x to /x/foo/bar -> foo/bar
result="${to##$from/}";;
("") # From /foo/bar to / -> ../..
dir2dotdot "$from";;
(*)
case "$from" in
("$to"/*) # From /x/foo/bar to /x -> ../..
dir2dotdot "${from##$to/}";;
(*) # Everything else.
commondirpart "$from" "$to"
common="$result"
dir2dotdot "${from#$common}"
result="$result/${to#$common}"
esac
;;
esac
}
set -f # noglob
set -x
cat <<EOF |
/ / .
/- /- .
/? /? .
/?? /?? .
/??? /??? .
/?* /?* .
/* /* .
/* /** ../**
/* /*** ../***
/*.* /*.** ../*.**
/*.??? /*.?? ../*.??
/[] /[] .
/[a-z]* /[0-9]* ../[0-9]*
/foo /foo .
/foo / ..
/foo/bar / ../..
/foo/bar /foo ..
/foo/bar /foo/baz ../baz
/foo/bar /bar/foo ../../bar/foo
/foo/bar/baz /gnarf/blurfl/blubb ../../../gnarf/blurfl/blubb
/foo/bar/baz /gnarf ../../../gnarf
/foo/bar/baz /foo/baz ../../baz
/foo. /bar. ../bar.
EOF
while read FROM TO VIA; do
relativepath "$FROM" "$TO"
printf '%s\n' "FROM: $FROM" "TO: $TO" "VIA: $result"
if test "$result" != "$VIA"; then
printf '%s\n' "OOOPS! Expected '$VIA' but got '$result'"
fi
done
# vi: set tabstop=3 shiftwidth=3 expandtab fileformat=unix :
kasku和Pini的答案略有改进，空格更好，允许传递相对路径:
#!/bin/bash
# both $1 and $2 are paths
# returns $2 relative to $1
absolute=`readlink -f "$2"`
current=`readlink -f "$1"`
# Perl is magic
# Quoting horror.... spaces cause problems, that's why we need the extra " in here:
relative=$(perl -MFile::Spec -e "print File::Spec->abs2rel(q($absolute),q($current))")
echo $relative
