我有一个控制器负责与API通信，以更新用户的属性，名称，电子邮件等。每个用户都有一个“id”，当查看配置文件页面时，这个“id”从服务器传递过来。
我想把这个值传递给AngularJS控制器，这样它就知道当前用户的API入口点是什么。我试着在ng-controller中传递这个值。例如:
function UserCtrl(id, $scope, $filter) {
$scope.connection = $resource('api.com/user/' + id)
在HTML中
<body ng-controller="UserCtrl({% id %})">
其中{% id %}打印从服务器发送的id。但是会有错误。
在创建控制器时将值传递给控制器的正确方法是什么?
当前回答
你可以在设置路由时这样做。
.when('/newitem/:itemType', {
templateUrl: 'scripts/components/items/newEditItem.html',
controller: 'NewEditItemController as vm',
resolve: {
isEditMode: function () {
return true;
}
},
})
以后用它作为
(function () {
'use strict';
angular
.module('myApp')
.controller('NewEditItemController', NewEditItemController);
NewEditItemController.$inject = ['$http','isEditMode',$routeParams,];
function NewEditItemController($http, isEditMode, $routeParams) {
/* jshint validthis:true */
var vm = this;
vm.isEditMode = isEditMode;
vm.itemType = $routeParams.itemType;
}
})();
所以在这里，当我们设置路由时，我们发送:itemType并稍后从$routeParams中检索它。
其他回答
如果使用angular-ui-router，那么这是正确的解决方案:https://github.com/angular-ui/ui-router/wiki#resolve
基本上，在控制器实例化之前声明一组要“解析”的依赖项。你可以为你的每个“状态”声明依赖关系。然后将这些依赖项传递到控制器的“构造函数”中。
不，不可能。我认为你可以使用ng-init作为hack http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngInit。
这里有一个解决方案(基于Marcin Wyszynski的建议)，当你想要传递一个值到你的控制器，但你没有显式地在你的html中声明控制器(ng-init似乎需要)-例如，如果你用ng-view渲染你的模板，并通过routeProvider为相应的路由声明每个控制器。
JS
messageboard.directive('currentuser', ['CurrentUser', function(CurrentUser) {
return function(scope, element, attrs) {
CurrentUser.name = attrs.name;
};
}]);
html
<div ng-app="app">
<div class="view-container">
<div ng-view currentuser name="testusername" class="view-frame animate-view"></div>
</div>
</div>
在这个解决方案中，CurrentUser是一个服务，它可以被注入到任何控制器中，此时.name属性可用。
两个笔记:
a problem I've encountered is that .name gets set after the controller loads, so as a workaround I have a short timeout before rendering username on the controller's scope. Is there a neat way of waiting until .name has been set on the service? this feels like a very easy way to get a current user into your Angular App with all the authentication kept outside Angular. You could have a before_filter to prevent non-logged in users getting to the html where your Angular app is bootstrapped in, and within that html you could just interpolate the logged in user's name and even their ID if you wanted to interact with the user's details via http requests from your Angular app. You could allow non-logged in users to use the Angular App with a default 'guest user'. Any advice on why this approach would be bad would be welcome - it feels too easy to be sensible!)
注:
这个答案已经过时了。这只是一个关于如何实现预期结果的概念证明。然而，根据下面的一些评论，这可能不是最好的解决方案。我没有任何文档来支持或拒绝以下方法。请参考下面的一些评论，以进一步讨论这个主题。
最初的回答:
我回答了这个问题 是的，你完全可以使用ng-init和一个简单的init函数来做到这一点。
这是它在plunker的例子
超文本标记语言
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html ng-app="angularjs-starter">
<head lang="en">
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.0.3/angular.min.js"></script>
<script src="app.js"></script>
</head>
<body ng-controller="MainCtrl" ng-init="init('James Bond','007')">
<h1>I am {{name}} {{id}}</h1>
</body>
</html>
JavaScript
var app = angular.module('angularjs-starter', []);
app.controller('MainCtrl', function($scope) {
$scope.init = function(name, id)
{
//This function is sort of private constructor for controller
$scope.id = id;
$scope.name = name;
//Based on passed argument you can make a call to resource
//and initialize more objects
//$resource.getMeBond(007)
};
});
视图不应该指定配置
In Angular, the template should never dictate configuration, which is inherently what people desire when they want to pass arguments to controllers from a template file. This becomes a slippery slope. If config settings are hard-coded in templates (such as by a directive or controller argument attribute), you can no longer re-use that template for anything but that single use. Soon you'll want to re-use that template, but with different config and now in order to do so you'll either be pre-processing the templates to inject variables before it gets passed to angular or using massive directives to spit out giant blocks of HTML so you re-use all of the controller HTML except for the wrapper div and it's arguments. For small projects it's no big deal. For something big (what angular excels at), it gets ugly quick.
替代方案:模块
This type of configuration is what modules were designed to handle. In many angular tutorials people have a single module for their entire application, but really the system is designed and fully supports many small modules each which wrap small pieces of the total application. Ideally, controllers, modules etc would be declared in separate files and stitched together in specific re-usable chunks. When your application is designed this way, you get a lot of re-use in addition to easy controller arguments.
The example below has 2 modules, re-using the same controller, but each with their own config settings. That config settings are passed in via dependency injection using module.value. This adheres to the angular way because we have the following: constructor dependency injection, reusable controller code, reusable controller templates (the controller div could easily be included with ng-include), easily unit-testable system without HTML, and lastly re-usable modules as the vehicle for stitching the pieces together.
这里有一个例子:
<!-- index.html -->
<div id="module1">
<div ng-controller="MyCtrl">
<div>{{foo}}</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="module2">
<div ng-controller="MyCtrl">
<div>{{foo}}</div>
</div>
</div>
<script>
// part of this template, or a JS file designed to be used with this template
angular.element(document).ready(function() {
angular.bootstrap(document.getElementById("module1"), ["module1"]);
angular.bootstrap(document.getElementById("module2"), ["module2"]);
});
</script>
<!-- scripts which will likely in be in their seperate files -->
<script>
// MyCtrl.js
var MyCtrl = function($scope, foo) {
$scope.foo = foo;
}
MyCtrl.$inject = ["$scope", "foo"];
// Module1.js
var module1 = angular.module('module1', []);
module1.value("foo", "fooValue1");
module1.controller("MyCtrl", MyCtrl);
// Module2.js file
var module2 = angular.module('module2', []);
module2.value("foo", "fooValue2");
module2.controller("MyCtrl", MyCtrl);
</script>
查看它的实际运行情况:jsFiddle。
