就像@akonsu和Nigel Findlater建议的那样，你可以用$routeParams读取url, url是index.html#/user/:id。Id并在控制器中使用它。

你的应用程序:

var app = angular.module('myApp', [ 'ngResource' ]);

app.config(['$routeProvider', function($routeProvider) {
    $routeProvider.when('/:type/:id', {templateUrl: 'myView.html', controller: 'myCtrl'});
}]);

资源服务

app.factory('MyElements', ['$resource', function($resource) {
     return $resource('url/to/json/:type/:id', { type:'@type', id:'@id' });
}]);

控制器

app.controller('MyCtrl', ['$scope', '$routeParams', 'MyElements', function($scope, $routeParams, MyElements) {
    MyElements.get({'type': $routeParams.type, "id": $routeParams.id }, function(elm) {
        $scope.elm = elm;
    })
}]);

然后，根据id在视图中可以访问elm。

我对此很晚了，我不知道这是否是一个好主意，但你可以在控制器函数中包括$attrs注入，允许控制器使用元素上提供的“参数”进行初始化，例如。

app.controller('modelController', function($scope, $attrs) {
    if (!$attrs.model) throw new Error("No model for modelController");

    // Initialize $scope using the value of the model attribute, e.g.,
    $scope.url = "http://example.com/fetch?model="+$attrs.model;
})

<div ng-controller="modelController" model="foobar">
  <a href="{{url}}">Click here</a>
</div>

同样，不知道这是否是一个好主意，但它似乎有效，是另一种选择。

不，不可能。我认为你可以使用ng-init作为hack http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngInit。

我发现从$routeProvider传递变量很有用。

例如，你在多个屏幕上使用一个控制器MyController，在里面传递一些非常重要的变量“mySuperConstant”。

使用这个简单的结构:

Router:

$routeProvider
            .when('/this-page', {
                templateUrl: 'common.html',
                controller: MyController,
                mySuperConstant: "123"
            })
            .when('/that-page', {
                templateUrl: 'common.html',
                controller: MyController,
                mySuperConstant: "456"
            })
            .when('/another-page', {
                templateUrl: 'common.html',
                controller: MyController,
                mySuperConstant: "789"
            })

MyController:

    MyController: function ($scope, $route) {
        var mySuperConstant: $route.current.mySuperConstant;
        alert(mySuperConstant);

    }

对于我的特定用例，我真的不喜欢这里的任何解决方案，所以我想我应该发布我所做的，因为我在这里没有看到它。

我只是想在ng-repeat循环中使用一个更像指令的控制器:

<div ng-repeat="objParameter in [{id:'a'},{id:'b'},{id:'c'}]">
  <div ng-controller="DirectiveLikeController as ctrl"></div>
</div>

现在，为了在每个DirectiveLikeController中创建时访问objParameter(或在任何时候获得最新的objParameter)，我所需要做的就是注入$scope并调用$scope.$eval('objParameter'):

var app = angular.module('myapp', []);
app.controller('DirectiveLikeController',['$scope'], function($scope) {
   //print 'a' for the 1st instance, 'b' for the 2nd instance, and 'c' for the 3rd.
   console.log($scope.$eval('objParameter').id); 
});

我看到的唯一缺点是它要求父控制器知道参数名为objParameter。

视图不应该指定配置

In Angular, the template should never dictate configuration, which is inherently what people desire when they want to pass arguments to controllers from a template file. This becomes a slippery slope. If config settings are hard-coded in templates (such as by a directive or controller argument attribute), you can no longer re-use that template for anything but that single use. Soon you'll want to re-use that template, but with different config and now in order to do so you'll either be pre-processing the templates to inject variables before it gets passed to angular or using massive directives to spit out giant blocks of HTML so you re-use all of the controller HTML except for the wrapper div and it's arguments. For small projects it's no big deal. For something big (what angular excels at), it gets ugly quick.

替代方案:模块

This type of configuration is what modules were designed to handle. In many angular tutorials people have a single module for their entire application, but really the system is designed and fully supports many small modules each which wrap small pieces of the total application. Ideally, controllers, modules etc would be declared in separate files and stitched together in specific re-usable chunks. When your application is designed this way, you get a lot of re-use in addition to easy controller arguments.

The example below has 2 modules, re-using the same controller, but each with their own config settings. That config settings are passed in via dependency injection using module.value. This adheres to the angular way because we have the following: constructor dependency injection, reusable controller code, reusable controller templates (the controller div could easily be included with ng-include), easily unit-testable system without HTML, and lastly re-usable modules as the vehicle for stitching the pieces together.

这里有一个例子:

<!-- index.html -->
<div id="module1">
    <div ng-controller="MyCtrl">
        <div>{{foo}}</div>
    </div>
</div>
<div id="module2">
    <div ng-controller="MyCtrl">
        <div>{{foo}}</div>
    </div>
</div>
<script>
    // part of this template, or a JS file designed to be used with this template
    angular.element(document).ready(function() {
        angular.bootstrap(document.getElementById("module1"), ["module1"]);
        angular.bootstrap(document.getElementById("module2"), ["module2"]);
    });
</script>

<!-- scripts which will likely in be in their seperate files -->
<script>
    // MyCtrl.js
    var MyCtrl = function($scope, foo) {
    $scope.foo = foo;
    }

    MyCtrl.$inject = ["$scope", "foo"];

    // Module1.js
    var module1 = angular.module('module1', []);
    module1.value("foo", "fooValue1");
    module1.controller("MyCtrl", MyCtrl);

    // Module2.js file
    var module2 = angular.module('module2', []);
    module2.value("foo", "fooValue2");
    module2.controller("MyCtrl", MyCtrl);
</script>

查看它的实际运行情况:jsFiddle。