看起来对你来说最好的解决方案实际上是一个指令。这允许你仍然拥有你的控制器，但是为它定义自定义属性。

如果你需要访问包装范围内的变量，使用这个:

angular.module('myModule').directive('user', function ($filter) {
  return {
    link: function (scope, element, attrs) {
      $scope.connection = $resource('api.com/user/' + attrs.userId);
    }
  };
});

<user user-id="{% id %}"></user>

如果你不需要访问包装范围内的变量，可以使用这个:

angular.module('myModule').directive('user', function ($filter) {
  return {
    scope: {
      userId: '@'
    },
    link: function (scope, element, attrs) {
      $scope.connection = $resource('api.com/user/' + scope.userId);
    }
  };
});

<user user-id="{% id %}"></user>

不，不可能。我认为你可以使用ng-init作为hack http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngInit。

视图不应该指定配置

In Angular, the template should never dictate configuration, which is inherently what people desire when they want to pass arguments to controllers from a template file. This becomes a slippery slope. If config settings are hard-coded in templates (such as by a directive or controller argument attribute), you can no longer re-use that template for anything but that single use. Soon you'll want to re-use that template, but with different config and now in order to do so you'll either be pre-processing the templates to inject variables before it gets passed to angular or using massive directives to spit out giant blocks of HTML so you re-use all of the controller HTML except for the wrapper div and it's arguments. For small projects it's no big deal. For something big (what angular excels at), it gets ugly quick.

替代方案:模块

This type of configuration is what modules were designed to handle. In many angular tutorials people have a single module for their entire application, but really the system is designed and fully supports many small modules each which wrap small pieces of the total application. Ideally, controllers, modules etc would be declared in separate files and stitched together in specific re-usable chunks. When your application is designed this way, you get a lot of re-use in addition to easy controller arguments.

The example below has 2 modules, re-using the same controller, but each with their own config settings. That config settings are passed in via dependency injection using module.value. This adheres to the angular way because we have the following: constructor dependency injection, reusable controller code, reusable controller templates (the controller div could easily be included with ng-include), easily unit-testable system without HTML, and lastly re-usable modules as the vehicle for stitching the pieces together.

这里有一个例子:

<!-- index.html -->
<div id="module1">
    <div ng-controller="MyCtrl">
        <div>{{foo}}</div>
    </div>
</div>
<div id="module2">
    <div ng-controller="MyCtrl">
        <div>{{foo}}</div>
    </div>
</div>
<script>
    // part of this template, or a JS file designed to be used with this template
    angular.element(document).ready(function() {
        angular.bootstrap(document.getElementById("module1"), ["module1"]);
        angular.bootstrap(document.getElementById("module2"), ["module2"]);
    });
</script>

<!-- scripts which will likely in be in their seperate files -->
<script>
    // MyCtrl.js
    var MyCtrl = function($scope, foo) {
    $scope.foo = foo;
    }

    MyCtrl.$inject = ["$scope", "foo"];

    // Module1.js
    var module1 = angular.module('module1', []);
    module1.value("foo", "fooValue1");
    module1.controller("MyCtrl", MyCtrl);

    // Module2.js file
    var module2 = angular.module('module2', []);
    module2.value("foo", "fooValue2");
    module2.controller("MyCtrl", MyCtrl);
</script>

查看它的实际运行情况:jsFiddle。

你可以在设置路由时这样做。

 .when('/newitem/:itemType', {
            templateUrl: 'scripts/components/items/newEditItem.html',
            controller: 'NewEditItemController as vm',
            resolve: {
              isEditMode: function () {
                return true;
              }
            },
        })

以后用它作为

(function () {
  'use strict';

  angular
    .module('myApp')
    .controller('NewEditItemController', NewEditItemController);

  NewEditItemController.$inject = ['$http','isEditMode',$routeParams,];

  function NewEditItemController($http, isEditMode, $routeParams) {
    /* jshint validthis:true */

    var vm = this;
    vm.isEditMode = isEditMode;
    vm.itemType = $routeParams.itemType;
  }
})();

所以在这里，当我们设置路由时，我们发送:itemType并稍后从$routeParams中检索它。

我对此很晚了，我不知道这是否是一个好主意，但你可以在控制器函数中包括$attrs注入，允许控制器使用元素上提供的“参数”进行初始化，例如。

app.controller('modelController', function($scope, $attrs) {
    if (!$attrs.model) throw new Error("No model for modelController");

    // Initialize $scope using the value of the model attribute, e.g.,
    $scope.url = "http://example.com/fetch?model="+$attrs.model;
})

<div ng-controller="modelController" model="foobar">
  <a href="{{url}}">Click here</a>
</div>

同样，不知道这是否是一个好主意，但它似乎有效，是另一种选择。

注:

这个答案已经过时了。这只是一个关于如何实现预期结果的概念证明。然而，根据下面的一些评论，这可能不是最好的解决方案。我没有任何文档来支持或拒绝以下方法。请参考下面的一些评论，以进一步讨论这个主题。

最初的回答:

我回答了这个问题 是的，你完全可以使用ng-init和一个简单的init函数来做到这一点。

这是它在plunker的例子

超文本标记语言

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html ng-app="angularjs-starter">
  <head lang="en">
    <script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.0.3/angular.min.js"></script>
    <script src="app.js"></script>
  </head>  
  <body ng-controller="MainCtrl" ng-init="init('James Bond','007')">
    <h1>I am  {{name}} {{id}}</h1>
  </body>
</html>

JavaScript

var app = angular.module('angularjs-starter', []);

app.controller('MainCtrl', function($scope) {

  $scope.init = function(name, id)
  {
    //This function is sort of private constructor for controller
    $scope.id = id;
    $scope.name = name; 
    //Based on passed argument you can make a call to resource
    //and initialize more objects
    //$resource.getMeBond(007)
  };


});