为了有效地创建一个将字符串的大小写转换为驼峰式大小写的函数，该函数还需要首先将每个字符串转换为小写，然后再将非第一个字符串的第一个字符转换为大写字母。

我的示例字符串是:

"text That I WaNt to make cAMEL case"

对于这个问题提供的许多其他解决方案返回这个:

"textThatIWaNtToMakeCAMELCase"

我认为应该是预期的，期望的输出将是这样的，其中所有的中间字符串大写字符首先转换为小写:

"textThatIWanrtToMakeCamelCase"

这可以在不使用任何replace()方法调用的情况下完成，通过使用String.prototype.split()， Array.prototype.map()和Array.prototype.join()方法:

≤ES5版本

function makeCamelCase(str) {
  return str
    .split(' ')
    .map((e,i) => i
      ? e.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + e.slice(1).toLowerCase()
      : e.toLowerCase()
    )
    .join('')
}

makeCamelCase("text That I WaNt to make cAMEL case")
// -> "textThatIWanrtToMakeCamelCase" ✅

我将分解每一行的功能，然后以其他两种格式提供相同的解决方案——ES6格式和字符串格式。prototype方法，不过我建议不要像这样直接扩展内置的JavaScript原型。

讲解员

function makeCamelCase(str) {
  return str
    // split string into array of different words by splitting at spaces
    .split(' ')
    // map array of words into two different cases, one for the first word (`i == false`) and one for all other words in the array (where `i == true`). `i` is a parameter that denotes the current index of the array item being evaluated. Because indexes start at `0` and `0` is a "falsy" value, we can use the false/else case of this ternary expression to match the first string where `i === 0`.
    .map((e,i) => i
      // for all non-first words, use a capitalized form of the first character + the lowercase version of the rest of the word (excluding the first character using the slice() method)
      ? e.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + e.slice(1).toLowerCase()
      // for the first word, we convert the entire word to lowercase
      : e.toLowerCase()
    )
    // finally, we join the different strings back together into a single string without spaces, our camel-cased string
    .join('')
}

makeCamelCase("text That I WaNt to make cAMEL case")
// -> "textThatIWanrtToMakeCamelCase" ✅

压缩ES6+(一行程序)版本

const makeCamelCase = str => str.split(' ').map((e,i) => i ? e.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + e.slice(1).toLowerCase() : e.toLowerCase()).join('')

makeCamelCase("text That I WaNt to make cAMEL case")
// -> "textThatIWanrtToMakeCamelCase" ✅

字符串。原型方法版本

String.prototype.toCamelCase = function() {
  return this
    .split(' ')
    .map((e,i) => i
      ? e.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + e.slice(1).toLowerCase()
      : e.toLowerCase()
    )
    .join('')
}

"text That I WaNt to make cAMEL case".toCamelCase()
// -> "textThatIWanrtToMakeCamelCase" ✅

return "hello world".toLowerCase().replace(/(?:(^.)|(\s+.))/g, function(match) {
    return match.charAt(match.length-1).toUpperCase();
}); // HelloWorld

从上驼峰格式("TestString")到下驼峰格式("TestString")，而不使用正则表达式(让我们面对现实吧，正则表达式是邪恶的):

'TestString'.split('').reduce((t, v, k) => t + (k === 0 ? v.toLowerCase() : v), '');

以下是我的建议:

function toCamelCase(string) {
  return `${string}`
    .replace(new RegExp(/[-_]+/, 'g'), ' ')
    .replace(new RegExp(/[^\w\s]/, 'g'), '')
    .replace(
      new RegExp(/\s+(.)(\w+)/, 'g'),
      ($1, $2, $3) => `${$2.toUpperCase() + $3.toLowerCase()}`
    )
    .replace(new RegExp(/\s/, 'g'), '')
    .replace(new RegExp(/\w/), s => s.toLowerCase());
}

or

String.prototype.toCamelCase = function() {
  return this
    .replace(new RegExp(/[-_]+/, 'g'), ' ')
    .replace(new RegExp(/[^\w\s]/, 'g'), '')
    .replace(
      new RegExp(/\s+(.)(\w+)/, 'g'),
      ($1, $2, $3) => `${$2.toUpperCase() + $3.toLowerCase()}`
    )
    .replace(new RegExp(/\s/, 'g'), '')
    .replace(new RegExp(/\w/), s => s.toLowerCase());
};

测试用例:

describe('String to camel case', function() {
  it('should return a camel cased string', function() {
    chai.assert.equal(toCamelCase('foo bar'), 'fooBar');
    chai.assert.equal(toCamelCase('Foo Bar'), 'fooBar');
    chai.assert.equal(toCamelCase('fooBar'), 'fooBar');
    chai.assert.equal(toCamelCase('FooBar'), 'fooBar');
    chai.assert.equal(toCamelCase('--foo-bar--'), 'fooBar');
    chai.assert.equal(toCamelCase('__FOO_BAR__'), 'fooBar');
    chai.assert.equal(toCamelCase('!--foo-¿?-bar--121-**%'), 'fooBar121');
  });
});

因为这个问题还需要另一个答案……

我尝试了之前的几种解决方案，它们都有这样或那样的缺陷。有些没有删除标点符号;有些人不处理有数字的案件;有些人不能处理连续多个标点符号。

它们都没有处理a12b这样的字符串。对于这种情况，没有明确定义的约定，但其他一些stackoverflow问题建议用下划线分隔数字。

我怀疑这是性能最好的答案(三个regex通过字符串，而不是一个或两个)，但它通过了我能想到的所有测试。不过，老实说，我真的无法想象有一种情况，您执行了如此多的驼峰式转换，以至于性能会变得很重要。

(我添加了一个npm包。它还包括一个可选的布尔参数，以返回Pascal Case而不是Camel Case。)

const underscoreRegex = /(?:[^\w\s]|_)+/g,
    sandwichNumberRegex = /(\d)\s+(?=\d)/g,
    camelCaseRegex = /(?:^\s*\w|\b\w|\W+)/g;

String.prototype.toCamelCase = function() {
    if (/^\s*_[\s_]*$/g.test(this)) {
        return '_';
    }

    return this.replace(underscoreRegex, ' ')
        .replace(sandwichNumberRegex, '$1_')
        .replace(camelCaseRegex, function(match, index) {
            if (/^\W+$/.test(match)) {
                return '';
            }

            return index == 0 ? match.trimLeft().toLowerCase() : match.toUpperCase();
        });
}

测试用例(开玩笑)

test('Basic strings', () => {
    expect(''.toCamelCase()).toBe('');
    expect('A B C'.toCamelCase()).toBe('aBC');
    expect('aB c'.toCamelCase()).toBe('aBC');
    expect('abc      def'.toCamelCase()).toBe('abcDef');
    expect('abc__ _ _def'.toCamelCase()).toBe('abcDef');
    expect('abc__ _ d_ e _ _fg'.toCamelCase()).toBe('abcDEFg');
});

test('Basic strings with punctuation', () => {
    expect(`a'b--d -- f.h`.toCamelCase()).toBe('aBDFH');
    expect(`...a...def`.toCamelCase()).toBe('aDef');
});

test('Strings with numbers', () => {
    expect('12 3 4 5'.toCamelCase()).toBe('12_3_4_5');
    expect('12 3 abc'.toCamelCase()).toBe('12_3Abc');
    expect('ab2c'.toCamelCase()).toBe('ab2c');
    expect('1abc'.toCamelCase()).toBe('1abc');
    expect('1Abc'.toCamelCase()).toBe('1Abc');
    expect('abc 2def'.toCamelCase()).toBe('abc2def');
    expect('abc-2def'.toCamelCase()).toBe('abc2def');
    expect('abc_2def'.toCamelCase()).toBe('abc2def');
    expect('abc1_2def'.toCamelCase()).toBe('abc1_2def');
    expect('abc1 2def'.toCamelCase()).toBe('abc1_2def');
    expect('abc1 2   3def'.toCamelCase()).toBe('abc1_2_3def');
});

test('Oddball cases', () => {
    expect('_'.toCamelCase()).toBe('_');
    expect('__'.toCamelCase()).toBe('_');
    expect('_ _'.toCamelCase()).toBe('_');
    expect('\t_ _\n'.toCamelCase()).toBe('_');
    expect('_a_'.toCamelCase()).toBe('a');
    expect('\''.toCamelCase()).toBe('');
    expect(`\tab\tcd`.toCamelCase()).toBe('abCd');
    expect(`
ab\tcd\r

-_

|'ef`.toCamelCase()).toBe(`abCdEf`);
});

看看你的代码，你可以实现它只有两个替换调用:

function camelize(str) {
  return str.replace(/(?:^\w|[A-Z]|\b\w)/g, function(word, index) {
    return index === 0 ? word.toLowerCase() : word.toUpperCase();
  }).replace(/\s+/g, '');
}

camelize("EquipmentClass name");
camelize("Equipment className");
camelize("equipment class name");
camelize("Equipment Class Name");
// all output "equipmentClassName"

编辑:或者使用一个替换调用，捕获RegExp中的空白。

function camelize(str) {
  return str.replace(/(?:^\w|[A-Z]|\b\w|\s+)/g, function(match, index) {
    if (+match === 0) return ""; // or if (/\s+/.test(match)) for white spaces
    return index === 0 ? match.toLowerCase() : match.toUpperCase();
  });
}